-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] GraalVM JDK 21 #669
Open
geofjamg
wants to merge
52
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
graalvm_jdk21
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
[WIP] GraalVM JDK 21 #669
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@gmail.com>
EtienneLt
reviewed
Nov 2, 2023
@@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ | |||
<version>1.1.0-SNAPSHOT</version> | |||
|
|||
<properties> | |||
<java.version>17</java.version> | |||
<java.version>21</java.version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no problem with maven version ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We will revert this to 17 in this pr to keep java 17 source compatibility, even using jdk 21
# Conflicts: # README.md
# Conflicts: # cpp/CMakeLists.txt
* add parameter : edge_info_displayed --------- Signed-off-by: Tiphaine Mouminous <tiphaine.mouminous_externe@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Coline PILOQUET <coline.piloquet@rte-france.com>
* add Sld parameters in doc --------- Signed-off-by: Tiphaine Mouminous <tiphaine.mouminous_externe@rte-france.com>
* Upgrade to PowSyBl 2024.1.2 --------- Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Damien Jeandemange <damien.jeandemange@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: Damien Jeandemange <damien.jeandemange@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: Damien Jeandemange <damien.jeandemange@artelys.com>
--------- Signed-off-by: Etienne LESOT <etienne.lesot@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiphaine Mouminous <tiphaine.mouminous_externe@rte-france.com> Co-authored-by: Sophie Frasnedo <93923177+So-Fras@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Hugo KULESZA <hugo.kulesza@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Hugo KULESZA <hugo.kulesza@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiphaine Mouminous <tiphaine.mouminous_externe@rte-france.com> Co-authored-by: Sophie Frasnedo <93923177+So-Fras@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Hugo KULESZA <hugo.kulesza@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Hugo KULESZA <hugo.kulesza@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Bertrand Rix <bertrand.rix@artelys.com>
…parameters list, is evaluated at declaration and can trigger a call before proper pypowsybl init. (#804) Signed-off-by: Bertrand Rix <bertrand.rix@artelys.com> Co-authored-by: HugoKulesza <94374655+HugoKulesza@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Biasuzzi <christian.biasuzzi@soft.it> Co-authored-by: Sophie Frasnedo <93923177+So-Fras@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: HugoKulesza <94374655+HugoKulesza@users.noreply.github.com>
--------- Signed-off-by: Etienne LESOT <etienne.lesot@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Bertrand Rix <bertrand.rix@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: Coline PILOQUET <coline.piloquet@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiphaine Mouminous <tiphaine.mouminous_externe@rte-france.com>
…rameter (#806) Signed-off-by: Christian Biasuzzi <christian.biasuzzi@soft.it>
Signed-off-by: Etienne LESOT <etienne.lesot@rte-france.com> Signed-off-by: Coline PILOQUET <coline.piloquet@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Etienne LESOT <etienne.lesot@rte-france.com>
# Conflicts: # cpp/powsybl-cpp/CMakeLists.txt
# Conflicts: # cpp/powsybl-cpp/CMakeLists.txt # java/src/main/java/com/powsybl/python/network/NetworkCFunctions.java
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
No
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
JDK version update
What is the current behavior?
In order to use '--pgo-instrument -H:+ProfilingEnableProfileDumpHooks' to instrument for PGO a shared library we need to upgrade to JDK 21. This is not supported with JDK 17.
But there is an issue in JDK 21 that does not allow to use native image with the class path oracle/graal#7712. So we need to wait for a fix or a workaround.
Another issue that have to be solved for upgrading to JDK21: oracle/graal#7759
24/08/04 Still same error with JDK22
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?
Other information: