This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 14, 2022. It is now read-only.
Testing codecov from a fork #168
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
emersonknapp
force-pushed
the
emersonknapp/colcon-defaults
branch
from
93a340b to
536103d
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #168 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 93.85% 93.69% -0.17%
==========================================
Files 7 7
Lines 228 222 -6
==========================================
- Hits 214 208 -6
Misses 14 14
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Signed-off-by: Emerson Knapp <emerson.b.knapp@gmail.com>
|
🎉 |
emersonknapp
force-pushed
the
emersonknapp/colcon-defaults
branch
from
536103d to
d77f8b1
Compare
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm opening this PR to see if I get codecov results from a fork
Closes #132 if codecov posts a coverage comment on this review