-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Awaiting Payment April 30th] [$250] [Guided Setup] Update custom messages in the onboarding flow #40261
Comments
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.Update the customer messages for the onboarding flow What is the root cause of that problem?Feature request What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?We need to remove the following welcome messages from all the const: Lines 3552 to 3560 in 5f04270
So for example the above onboardingChoices.EMPLOYER will now be
This way we'll update all the messages from Line 3537 in 5f04270
These messages will be updated as per the description stated above in the issue What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional) |
@danielrvidal , I guess you forgot to put the |
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0119f0ea9acc1824fb |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @jayeshmangwani ( |
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.We want to update custom messages in the onboarding flow What is the root cause of that problem?This is a new feature request. What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?The list of Concierge welcome messages are here.
We need to update the custom message to remove So for
Similar for other types listed above.
We should remove the key and its usage completely since it's not needed. So for What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)NA |
That is implementation detail @tienifr , for proposals we look at the basis idea of how the changes are going to be, thanks Please refer the proposal completely, My proposal also stated the below:
c.c. @jayeshmangwani |
@GandalfGwaihir Isn't it the default thing that any proposal will have to do? 😄 So I'd think it doesn't add any extra value to your proposal. Let's wait for the review from @jayeshmangwani 👍 |
@GandalfGwaihir @tienifr Hey, I am carefully reviewing proposals, line by line. Please wait for a few minutes 🙏 |
@GandalfGwaihir Question for you from your proposal,
You mentioned that onboardingChoices.EMPLOYER will now be like above, but this is missing the header part. It should be below, right?
|
Yes it should be and hence i mentioned at the end
The proposal just contained an example edit of where the changes are going to be and not pin point texts :) I mean those are done during the PR stage right? |
Fair enough |
@jayeshmangwani @GandalfGwaihir The example should be correct and reflects the intention of the proposer, especially for straight-forward issues like this one. The proposal here clearly says
So that's the intention, which is incorrect and doesn't solve the problem. Also, in case of |
@GandalfGwaihir This is a pretty straightforward issue. There is a small missing detail in your proposal, though, that can be done on the PR process; for transparency, I find that @tienifr has a more accurate and detailed Proposal; we can go with them. 🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed It's kind of a little hard for me to decide, but let's see what internal engineer think of: |
Triggered auto assignment to @MariaHCD, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details. |
Thanks for the discussion here, everyone! In my opinion, if it's a straightforward issue, I'd be more likely to go with the more accurate and detailed proposal which, in this case, is @tienifr's proposal. |
📣 @jayeshmangwani 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Reviewer role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app! |
📣 @tienifr 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Contributor role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app! Offer link |
@tienifr given this is pretty straight forward, do you think your PR could be done today? This is just a high-priority issue, so I want to make sure to get a timeline with urgency. Thank you! |
If they aren't available to work on this urgently, then I am available to work on this now ;) thanks |
Thank you @GandalfGwaihir, @tienifr if you can get the PR up by tomorrow, that would be great. |
Yes, PR will be up in 2 hours (it's pretty early in my timezone). Thanks for all the patience. |
PR ready for review #40328. |
Thanks for the PR, starting PR review |
Triggered auto assignment to @trjExpensify ( |
PR hit production a couple of days ago. Updating the title to reflect the payment hold and adding the bug label to assign a BZ... that happens to be me. :) |
Not overdue; on payment hold. |
@MariaHCD @trjExpensify @jayeshmangwani @tienifr this issue was created 2 weeks ago. Are we close to approving a proposal? If not, what's blocking us from getting this issue assigned? Don't hesitate to create a thread in #expensify-open-source to align faster in real time. Thanks! |
Alright.. payment summary as follows:
Settled up with you both, closing! |
Coming from this design doc, in testing we found we were finding two welcome emails. One introing Concierge, and then one giving more info on the use case (details here).
As such, we'd like to update the message being triggered (the second message above) from the onboarding selection to remove the welcome portion of the subject line AND the concierge introduction currently in the message. As such, the messages that are based on use case selection are as follows:
If the user never makes a use case selection
We do not need to send anything, as we've already sent the intro.
If the user selects “I am just looking around”
We do not need to send anything, as we've already sent the intro and don't need more.
If the user selects “Chat and split expenses with friends”
If the user selects “Submit expenses to my employer to get paid back”
If the user selects “Track my business expenses to file taxes”
If the user selects “Manage my team’s expenses”
If the user selects “Track and budget personal spend”
Notes for completion:
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: