add lfp, vanadium, lair, pair battery technologies as storage units

[virio-andreyana]

<style> </style>

Technology	Parameter	Unit		PyPSA technology name	PyPSA technology name	PyPSA technology name	Proposed PyPSA name
Li-ion	Duration	h	1				lfp
	CAPEX_Storage	EUR/kW	81553.4846	Lithium-Ion-LFP-bicharger			lfp
	OPEX_Storage	EUR/kWh	236482.8109	Lithium-Ion-LFP-store			lfp
	FOM	%/yr	2.1645	Lithium-Ion-LFP-store	Lithium-Ion-LFP-bicharger		lfp
	Efficiency_Charge	per unit	0.9193	Lithium-Ion-LFP-bicharger			lfp
	Efficiency_Discharge	per unit	0.9193	Lithium-Ion-LFP-bicharger			lfp
Vanadium Redox Flow	Duration	h	10				vanadium
	CAPEX_Storage	EUR/kW	129023.0526	Vanadium-Redox-Flow-bicharger			vanadium
	OPEX_Storage	EUR/kWh	258072.8586	Vanadium-Redox-Flow-store			vanadium
	FOM	%/yr	2.674	Vanadium-Redox-Flow-store	Vanadium-Redox-Flow-bicharger		vanadium
	Efficiency_Charge	per unit	0.806	Vanadium-Redox-Flow-bicharger			vanadium
	Efficiency_Discharge	per unit	0.806	Vanadium-Redox-Flow-bicharger			vanadium
Liquid Air	Duration	h	12				lair
	CAPEX_Storage	EUR/kW	159004.771	Liquid-Air-charger	Liquid-Air-discharger		lair
	OPEX_Storage	EUR/kWh	809738.2619	Liquid-Air-store			lair
	FOM	%/yr	1.208	Liquid-Air-charger	Liquid-Air-discharger	Liquid-Air-store	lair
	Efficiency_Charge	per unit	0.99	Liquid-Air-charger			lair
	Efficiency_Discharge	per unit	0.55	Liquid-Air-discharger			lair
Adiabatic CAES	Duration	h	24				pair
	CAPEX_Storage	EUR/kW	946180.9426	Compressed-Air-Adiabatic-bicharger			pair
	OPEX_Storage	EUR/kWh	5448.7894	Compressed-Air-Adiabatic-store			pair
	FOM	%/yr	1.3565	Compressed-Air-Adiabatic-store	Compressed-Air-Adiabatic-bicharger		pair
	Efficiency_Charge	per unit	0.7211	Compressed-Air-Adiabatic-bicharger			pair
	Efficiency_Discharge	per unit	0.7211	Compressed-Air-Adiabatic-bicharger			pair

TODO list:

• Test config.form.yaml
• Include those battery technologies as store and link as well?
• add colouring scheme

[daniel-rdt]

Looking nice. Good and efficient job @virio-andreyana!! I tested it locally and it ran through all the way with solving.
Only left a few minor comments/suggestions that you can go over. One general thing that I would add is updating the doc/configtables descriptions for the changes that were made regarding the config file. Otherwise, can be merged then in my opinion

[daniel-rdt]

We will need to make sure that the adjusted efficiency for Adiabatic CAES at 77,45% (?) makes it into our model @virio-andreyana

[daniel-rdt]

@virio-andreyana Lily just answered this morning that they want to stick to the default battery storage and inverter values for Li-Ion. I think, we should still keep the lfp functionality but need to adjust it in the config.form.yaml which one we are using.

[virio-andreyana]

We will need to make sure that the adjusted efficiency for Adiabatic CAES at 77,45% (?) makes it into our model @virio-andreyana

I forgot, is that round trip or the efficiency for each charge and discharge? To prevent changing the cost table, we can put this in the config based on https://pypsa-eur.readthedocs.io/en/latest/configuration.html#adjustments. I need to test it first but what do you think?

adjustments:
  sector:
    absolute:
      StorageUnit:
        pair:
          efficiency_store: 0.7745
          efficiency_dispatch: 0.7745

[daniel-rdt]

We will need to make sure that the adjusted efficiency for Adiabatic CAES at 77,45% (?) makes it into our model @virio-andreyana

I forgot, is that round trip or the efficiency for each charge and discharge? To prevent changing the cost table, we can put this in the config based on https://pypsa-eur.readthedocs.io/en/latest/configuration.html#adjustments. I need to test it first but what do you think?

adjustments:
  sector:
    absolute:
      StorageUnit:
        pair:
          efficiency_store: 0.7745
          efficiency_dispatch: 0.7745

Nice, good idea. I am not quite sure though if that works with sector-coupled models, i.e. elements added in prepare_sector_network. We can indeed even use the overwrite functionality that I am implementing in this PR based on the PyPSA-Earth implementation and the EEE project: #23
This would also allow to specify in the costs tab of the config:

costs:
   efficiency:
       Compressed-Air-Adiabatic-bicharger: 0.7745

@virio-andreyana Maybe you can add this to the config within this PR, it won't work yet as it needs the changes from the PR above. But it will be functional once merged? What do you think?

[virio-andreyana]

@daniel-rdt Well the function that enables that adjustment is maybe_adjust_costs_and_potentials() which is already used in prepare_sector_network.py.

I find your idea more elegant, but it depends on how soon will #23 be merged. When do we want to start an initial scenario run?

[daniel-rdt]

@daniel-rdt Well the function that enables that adjustment is maybe_adjust_costs_and_potentials() which is already used in prepare_sector_network.py.

I find your idea more elegant, but it depends on how soon will #23 be merged. When do we want to start an initial scenario run?

Cool, the let's go the overwrites way. I want to get #23 merged today. I still need to make some minor adjustments though. My plan for the initial main scenario runs is to start this tomorrow before the weekend. Then we can have a look Monday, make some adjustments if necessary and have another run on Tuesday if necessary