-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ISO: ISO-690 issues #172
Comments
Please use ISO 8601-1 which we have samples for ISO XML, MN XML and actual published document for proofing of style. Thanks! |
@ronaldtse Between original ISO 8601-1 PDF and produced PDF there are a few differences in styles:
In a few month ago there were a few issues to align ISO xslt to original ISO Rice documents:
It seems this ISO 8601-1 looks differently. Do I need to remade all ISO xslt styles again to align ISO 8601-1? And I found that in iso-tc154-8601-1-en.xml there a few questions for me in markup:
instead of claims/term In produced PDF it shows as ('date' on the same line with '3.1.1.1'): but in source XML it marks as 'note':
which we display as 'NOTE'. In xslt we have processing for 'termnote' and it shows as 'Note x to entry' properly. Should I remade xslt to show 'Note x to entry' (instead of 'NOTE') for 'note' tag also? Or source xml contain mistakes? |
Is correct. Tables, Figures should also be hyperlinks.
What are the style differences between ISO Rice and ISO 8601-1?
"Clause X" is used for depth level 1, if it is a subclause with depth > 1 level, it is referred as "X.Y.Z".
This is an error in the source XML (https://github.com/metanorma/iso-8601-1) However, I don't see this problem in the source XML?
This is strange -- I don't see this problem in the source XML? Let me send you the source XML again. |
In source xml - In source PDF there a few notes which show as 'NOTE' (not 'Note 1 to entry') and it markup in XML as |
@Intelligent2013 you're right -- this is a regression! |
@ronaldtse ok, let's wait... |
@ronaldtse looks like there is an issue in |
Thanks @Intelligent2013 |
@ronaldtse Issue fixed: ... In XML there are a few issues:
XSL-FO 'don't know' how to display tabs, because there isn't such thing as 'tab stop' feature, therefore it display as: |
Questions:
Pinging @opoudjis for answer
In the DIS stage cover there is no place for the revision-date. Do we need it?
I wonder if we can handle tab characters using a table... |
I've recompiled, and am not finding "internet hyperlinks are just a text": cases like
Do not. There is no expectation that you render XML tab as anything but space. The tabs were in the asciidoc source, because of the original Word source use of them; but Metanorma does not give tabs a special value, and the PDF and Word rendering does not identify them as such. |
@ronaldtse In my two-days ago version I have text only (see
But in any case, xslt should process links as need. |
ISO-690, right?
shrug |
Hmmm.... In ISO-690 looks ok, but I talked about ISO 8601-1. Sorry for any inconveniences.
|
Right. They are text, because they have not been marked up in the source as links (unlike in ISO-690). Updated source in that instance. |
Seems that everything is addressed here. Thanks @Intelligent2013 @opoudjis ! |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: