Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FV3_HRRR_gf (RRFS physics) support mostly works #292

Conversation

SamuelTrahanNOAA
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes

Adds support for FV3_HRRR_gf suite. It nearly always works now.

The one time it doesn't work is the 2020082518 cycle of 13L. If you set the forecast length to 24 hours, it'll run to 24 hours, and abort during model finalization with a NaN. Instead, if you set the forecast length above 24 hours, or below 23 hours, and it'll run just fine.

This PR is mostly to let @mrinalbiswas start testing the configuration.

Also, there are some bug fixes to the ww3 initialization. Some regular expressions used a syntax that isn't supported in Python 3.11 and newer.

Issues addressed (optional)

N/A

Dependencies (optional)

If submodule PRs are required, please link them below. For example:

Contributors (optional)

Development thus far has mostly been me, but I do have some bug fixes from @mrinalbiswas.

Tests conducted

Only tested on Hercules, since that's where our resources are.

Ran 2020 13L cycles 2020082506 through 2020082618 with mom6 and ww3 coupling. All cycles worked except the one mentioned earlier. The rocoto/HRRRGF-mom6-ww3.sh will reproduce this bug.

Also ran 2023 10L, cycles 2023082618-2023082700 with no error. Succeeded uncoupled, and also coupled with mom6+ww3.

Application-level regression test status

None yet; @mrinalbiswas is working on this.

@mrinalbiswas mrinalbiswas merged commit 212f9c9 into hafs-community:feature/rrfs-physics Oct 18, 2024
@SamuelTrahanNOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mrinalbiswas - We can't merge this yet. We must merge the prerequisites first, and one of them has conflicts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants