Add EIP: SSZ transactions root #6404
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
All reviewers have approved. Auto merging... |
etan-status
force-pushed
the
el-ssz
branch
5 times, most recently
from
591feb4 to
980e81e
Compare
|
The commit 980e81e (as a parent of abb8848) contains errors. |
Pandapip1
reviewed
Feb 1, 2023
etan-status
force-pushed
the
el-ssz
branch
2 times, most recently
from
e26e2d1 to
165b685
Compare
lightclient
reviewed
Feb 2, 2023
axic
reviewed
Feb 2, 2023
axic
reviewed
Feb 2, 2023
axic
reviewed
Feb 2, 2023
|
Not-so-subtle reminder to keep technical topics on the |
dapplion
reviewed
Feb 8, 2023
dapplion
reviewed
Feb 8, 2023
etan-status
changed the title
etan-status
changed the title
SamWilsn
approved these changes
Feb 8, 2023
eth-bot
approved these changes
Feb 8, 2023
iseriohn
pushed a commit
to iseriohn/EIP-NFT-Rights-Management
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2023
* Add EIP: Transition to SSZ * Avoid CL/EL abbrev * Cleanups from review * remove block header conversion from scope * remove security discussion from scope * Update discussion link for new title * Clarifying comment about why receipts don't have LC issue * Update description * Remove blob wrapper; Sync EIP-2718 nums; Helpers for non-tx; data-gas * Fix section header * Add `transaction_hashes_root`. * rm fixed container capacity discussion from this EIP * Convert to `BlobTransaction` for sighash/hash computation * Further cleanup * Align `SignedTransaction` field order with serialization * Write permissions for Vitalik * Update constants for `Receipt` * Update `MAX_LOGS_PER_RECEIPT` * Add rationale about `ReceiptLog` data. * Remove merkle proof length from rationale * rm `TxHashVersion`, rm EIP-155 type, rm extra tree * rm `tx_hash` from `Receipt` for concurrent receipt/tx backfill (Geth) * typo (ty @dapplion) * Split away withdrawals (ethereum#6465) * Split away receipts (ethereum#6466)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When opening a pull request to submit a new EIP, please use the suggested template: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/eip-template.md
We have a GitHub bot that automatically merges some PRs. It will merge yours immediately if certain criteria are met: