refactor: small test infrastructure #672
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ematipico
approved these changes
Nov 4, 2023
| let mut content = String::new(); | ||
| file.read_to_string(&mut content) | ||
| .expect("failed to read file from memory FS"); | ||
| assert_file_contents(&fs, file_path, expect); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Here you went beyond the task; fantastic work! Not sure why the old code is like this... we completely forgot to do the content assertion!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
small refactor for #669
I divided it into two commits. The first one is a more confident replacement, and the second one I found that some tests were not written in full compliance with the rules, so I need help to check🧐