Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rm flaky test #9628

Merged

Conversation

benmoriceau
Copy link
Contributor

What

The test will be re-enable with #9627

@benmoriceau benmoriceau merged commit 16133cf into master Jan 20, 2022
@benmoriceau benmoriceau deleted the bmoric/remove-acceptance-test-based-on-new-scheduler branch January 20, 2022 02:56
benmoriceau added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2022
pmossman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2022
pmossman added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
* Revert "Rm flaky test (#9628)"

This reverts commit 16133cf.

* Restore the acceptance test running with the new scheduler

* Add timeout

* Isolate the new acceptance test

* Update github action name

* Attemptp to fix checkpointing

* Check the state retrieval instead of the existance of the workflow

* fix build

* Add concurrent list for test

* Do not wait for the workflow to be potentially destroy

* Silencely ignore the cancel exception

* Format

* Trigger build

* format

* Remove unrelated changes

* Update acceptance

* Try to fix race condition

* Try to slow down the connection

* Disable test

* Move the sleep

* Rm useless sleep

* Fix missing return

* add repeated

* try using infinite feed source for cancellation test

* set limits on infinite feed source

* misunderstood waitForJob, now correctly waiting for job to be in RUNNING

* clean up PR, DRY create definition methods, clearer method name for waiting on job

* fix acceptance tests action name

* fix imports

* more cleanup

* revert temporalClient do-while change

* fix workflow step names

Co-authored-by: Benoit Moriceau <benoit@airbyte.io>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant