[pull] main from MaxMood96:main #8
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![pull[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/12910?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51414. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108021
…nsor_expand_shape. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108565
This change adds the option --resultdb-output=path allow llvm-lit generating LuCI ResultDB JSON output for the test results, which can be better integrated with certain CI/CQ framework. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108238
This is pretty similar to the ST2 selection code in `AArch64InstructionSelector::selectIntrinsicWithSideEffects`. This is a GISel equivalent of the ld2 case in `AArch64DAGToDAGISel::Select`. There's some weirdness there that appears here too (e.g. using ld1 for scalar cases, which are 1-element vectors in SDAG.) It's a little gross that we have to create the copy and then select it right after, but I think we'd need to refactor the existing copy selection code quite a bit to do better. This was falling back while building llvm-project with GISel for AArch64. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108590
Enable FP16 FMA instructions. Ref.: https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/download/intel-avx512-fp16-architecture-specification.html Reviewed By: LuoYuanke Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105268
This patch adds many new keys to the text field and implements new behaviors as follows: ``` case KEY_HOME: case KEY_CTRL_A: MoveCursorToStart(); case KEY_END: case KEY_CTRL_E: MoveCursorToEnd(); case KEY_RIGHT: case KEY_SF: MoveCursorRight(); case KEY_LEFT: case KEY_SR: MoveCursorLeft(); case KEY_BACKSPACE: case KEY_DELETE: RemovePreviousChar(); case KEY_DC: RemoveNextChar(); case KEY_EOL: case KEY_CTRL_K: ClearToEnd(); case KEY_DL: case KEY_CLEAR: Clear(); ``` This patch also refactors scrolling to be dynamic at draw time for easier handing. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108385
In the raw profile, binary ids immediately follow the header so when computing counters offset we need to account for the new section. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108608
This patch adds a new key ALt+Enter key combination to form windows. Once invoked, the first action is executed without having to navigate to its button. Field exit callbacks are now also invoked on validation to support this aforementioned key combination. One concern for this key combination is its potential use by the window manager of the host. I am not sure if this will be a problem, but it is worth putting in consideration. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108410
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2021
This reverts commit a2768b4. Breaks sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast buildbot: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/11334 Log snippet: Testing: 0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80 FAIL: LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll (65549 of 78729) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll' FAILED ******************** Script: -- : 'RUN: at line 1'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll -instcombine -sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/einline.prof -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll -- Exit Code: 2 Command Output (stderr): -- /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'llvm::sampleprof::FunctionSamples' #0 0x5a730f8 in shouldInlineCandidate /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53 #1 0x5a730f8 in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::tryInlineCandidate((anonymous namespace)::InlineCandidate&, llvm::SmallVector<llvm::CallBase*, 8u>*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1178:21 #2 0x5a6cda6 in inlineHotFunctions /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1105:13 #3 0x5a6cda6 in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::emitAnnotations(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1633:16 #4 0x5a5fcbe in runOnFunction /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:2008:12 #5 0x5a5fcbe in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::runOnModule(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>*, llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo*, llvm::CallGraph*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1922:15 #6 0x5a5de55 in llvm::SampleProfileLoaderPass::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:2038:21 #7 0x6552a01 in llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::SampleProfileLoaderPass, llvm::PreservedAnalyses, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module> >::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:88:17 #8 0x57f807c in llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module> >::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:526:21 #9 0x37c8522 in llvm::runPassPipeline(llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module&, llvm::TargetMachine*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfoImpl*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::StringRef, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::StringRef>, llvm::opt_tool::OutputKind, llvm::opt_tool::VerifierKind, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/NewPMDriver.cpp:489:7 #10 0x37e7c11 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp:830:12 #11 0x7fbf4de4009a in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2409a) #12 0x379e519 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt+0x379e519) SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53 in FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty. FileCheck command line: /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll -- ******************** Testing: 0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80 FAIL: LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll (65643 of 78729) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll' FAILED ******************** Script: -- : 'RUN: at line 4'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/inline-cold.prof -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=NOTINLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll : 'RUN: at line 5'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -passes=sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/inline-cold.prof -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=NOTINLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll : 'RUN: at line 8'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/inline-cold.prof -sample-profile-inline-size -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=INLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll : 'RUN: at line 11'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -passes=sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/inline-cold.prof -sample-profile-inline-size -sample-profile-cold-inline-threshold=9999999 -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=INLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll : 'RUN: at line 14'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -passes=sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/inline-cold.prof -sample-profile-inline-size -sample-profile-cold-inline-threshold=-500 -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=NOTINLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -- Exit Code: 2 Command Output (stderr): -- /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'llvm::sampleprof::FunctionSamples' #0 0x5a730f8 in shouldInlineCandidate /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53 #1 0x5a730f8 in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::tryInlineCandidate((anonymous namespace)::InlineCandidate&, llvm::SmallVector<llvm::CallBase*, 8u>*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1178:21 #2 0x5a6cda6 in inlineHotFunctions /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1105:13 #3 0x5a6cda6 in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::emitAnnotations(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1633:16 #4 0x5a5fcbe in runOnFunction /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:2008:12 #5 0x5a5fcbe in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::runOnModule(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>*, llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo*, llvm::CallGraph*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1922:15 #6 0x5a5de55 in llvm::SampleProfileLoaderPass::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:2038:21 #7 0x6552a01 in llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::SampleProfileLoaderPass, llvm::PreservedAnalyses, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module> >::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:88:17 #8 0x57f807c in llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module> >::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:526:21 #9 0x37c8522 in llvm::runPassPipeline(llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module&, llvm::TargetMachine*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfoImpl*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::StringRef, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::StringRef>, llvm::opt_tool::OutputKind, llvm::opt_tool::VerifierKind, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/NewPMDriver.cpp:489:7 #10 0x37e7c11 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp:830:12 #11 0x7fcd534a209a in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2409a) #12 0x379e519 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt+0x379e519) SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53 in FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty. FileCheck command line: /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=INLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -- ******************** Testing: 0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90.. ******************** Failed Tests (2): LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2021
This allows selection like: eor w0, w1, w2, ror #8 Saves 500 bytes on ClamAV -Os, which is 0.1%. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109206
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2021
Recently a vulnerability issue is found in the implementation of VLLDM instruction in the Arm Cortex-M33, Cortex-M35P and Cortex-M55. If the VLLDM instruction is abandoned due to an exception when it is partially completed, it is possible for subsequent non-secure handler to access and modify the partial restored register values. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2021-35465. The mitigation sequence varies between v8-m and v8.1-m as follows: v8-m.main --------- mrs r5, control tst r5, #8 /* CONTROL_S.SFPA */ it ne .inst.w 0xeeb00a40 /* vmovne s0, s0 */ 1: vlldm sp /* Lazy restore of d0-d16 and FPSCR. */ v8.1-m.main ----------- vscclrm {vpr} /* Clear VPR. */ vlldm sp /* Lazy restore of d0-d16 and FPSCR. */ More details on developer.arm.com/support/arm-security-updates/vlldm-instruction-security-vulnerability Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109157
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2021
This patch re-introduces the fix in the commit llvm@66b0cebf7f736 by @yrnkrn > In DwarfEHPrepare, after all passes are run, RewindFunction may be a dangling > > pointer to a dead function. To make sure it's valid, doFinalization nullptrs > RewindFunction just like the constructor and so it will be found on next run. > > llvm-svn: 217737 It seems that the fix was not migrated to `DwarfEHPrepareLegacyPass`. This patch also updates `llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll` to include `-run-twice` to exercise the cleanup. Without this patch `llvm-lit -v llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll` fails with ``` -- Testing: 1 tests, 1 workers -- FAIL: LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll (1 of 1) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll' FAILED ******************** Script: -- : 'RUN: at line 1'; /home/arakaki/build/llvm-project/main/bin/opt -mtriple=x86_64-linux-gnu -dwarfehprepare -simplifycfg-require-and-preserve-domtree=1 -run-twice < /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll -S | /home/arakaki/build/llvm-project/main/bin/FileCheck /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll -- Exit Code: 2 Command Output (stderr): -- Referencing function in another module! call void @_Unwind_Resume(i8* %ehptr) #1 ; ModuleID = '<stdin>' void (i8*)* @_Unwind_Resume ; ModuleID = '<stdin>' in function simple_cleanup_catch LLVM ERROR: Broken function found, compilation aborted! PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.llvm.org/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: /home/arakaki/build/llvm-project/main/bin/opt -mtriple=x86_64-linux-gnu -dwarfehprepare -simplifycfg-require-and-preserve-domtree=1 -run-twice -S 1. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module '<stdin>'. 2. Running pass 'Module Verifier' on function '@simple_cleanup_catch' #0 0x000056121b570a2c llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:569:0 #1 0x000056121b56eb64 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:97:0 #2 0x000056121b56f28e SignalHandler(int) /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:397:0 #3 0x00007fc7e9b22980 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x12980) #4 0x00007fc7e87d3fb7 raise /build/glibc-S7xCS9/glibc-2.27/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51:0 #5 0x00007fc7e87d5921 abort /build/glibc-S7xCS9/glibc-2.27/stdlib/abort.c:81:0 #6 0x000056121b4e1386 llvm::raw_svector_ostream::raw_svector_ostream(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char>&) /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h:674:0 #7 0x000056121b4e1386 llvm::report_fatal_error(llvm::Twine const&, bool) /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/ErrorHandling.cpp:114:0 #8 0x000056121b4e1528 (/home/arakaki/build/llvm-project/main/bin/opt+0x29e3528) #9 0x000056121adfd03f llvm::raw_ostream::operator<<(llvm::StringRef) /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h:218:0 FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty. FileCheck command line: /home/arakaki/build/llvm-project/main/bin/FileCheck /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll -- ******************** ******************** Failed Tests (1): LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll Testing Time: 0.22s Failed: 1 ``` Reviewed By: loladiro Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110979
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2021
Although THREADLOCAL variables are supported on Darwin they cannot be used very early on during process init (before dyld has set it up). Unfortunately the checked lock is used before dyld has setup TLS leading to an abort call (`_tlv_boostrap()` is never supposed to be called at runtime). To avoid this problem `SANITIZER_CHECK_DEADLOCKS` is now disabled on Darwin platforms. This fixes running TSan tests (an possibly other Sanitizers) when `COMPILER_RT_DEBUG=ON`. For reference the crashing backtrace looks like this: ``` * thread #1, stop reason = signal SIGABRT * frame #0: 0x00000002044da0ae dyld`__abort_with_payload + 10 frame #1: 0x00000002044f01af dyld`abort_with_payload_wrapper_internal + 80 frame #2: 0x00000002044f01e1 dyld`abort_with_payload + 9 frame #3: 0x000000010c989060 dyld_sim`abort_with_payload + 26 frame #4: 0x000000010c94908b dyld_sim`dyld4::halt(char const*) + 375 frame #5: 0x000000010c988f5c dyld_sim`abort + 16 frame #6: 0x000000010c96104f dyld_sim`dyld4::APIs::_tlv_bootstrap() + 9 frame #7: 0x000000010cd8d6d2 libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::CheckedMutex::LockImpl(this=<unavailable>, pc=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_mutex.cpp:218:58 [opt] frame #8: 0x000000010cd8a0f7 libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Mutex::Lock() [inlined] __sanitizer::CheckedMutex::Lock(this=0x000000010d733c90) at sanitizer_mutex.h:124:5 [opt] frame #9: 0x000000010cd8a0ee libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Mutex::Lock(this=0x000000010d733c90) at sanitizer_mutex.h:162:19 [opt] frame #10: 0x000000010cd8a0bf libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock(this=0x000000030c7479a8, mu=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_mutex.h:364:10 [opt] frame #11: 0x000000010cd89819 libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock(this=0x000000030c7479a8, mu=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_mutex.h:363:67 [opt] frame #12: 0x000000010cd8985b libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::LibIgnore::OnLibraryLoaded(this=0x000000010d72f480, name=0x0000000000000000) at sanitizer_libignore.cpp:39:8 [opt] frame #13: 0x000000010cda7aaa libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::InitializeLibIgnore() at tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:219:16 [opt] frame #14: 0x000000010cdce0bb libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::Initialize(thr=0x0000000110141400) at tsan_rtl.cpp:403:3 [opt] frame #15: 0x000000010cda7b8e libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::ScopedInterceptor(__tsan::ThreadState*, char const*, unsigned long) [inlined] __tsan::LazyInitialize(thr=0x0000000110141400) at tsan_rtl.h:665:5 [opt] frame #16: 0x000000010cda7b86 libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::ScopedInterceptor(this=0x000000030c747af8, thr=0x0000000110141400, fname=<unavailable>, pc=4568918787) at tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:247:3 [opt] frame #17: 0x000000010cda7bb9 libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::ScopedInterceptor(this=0x000000030c747af8, thr=<unavailable>, fname=<unavailable>, pc=<unavailable>) at tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:246:59 [opt] frame #18: 0x000000010cdb72b7 libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`::wrap_strlcpy(dst="\xd2", src="0xd1d398d1bb0a007b", size=20) at sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:7386:3 [opt] frame #19: 0x0000000110542b03 libsystem_c.dylib`__guard_setup + 140 frame #20: 0x00000001104f8ab4 libsystem_c.dylib`_libc_initializer + 65 ... ``` rdar://83723445 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111243
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2021
…he parser" This reverts commit b0e8667. ASAN/UBSAN bot is broken with this trace: [ RUN ] FlatAffineConstraintsTest.FindSampleTest llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/Support/MathExtras.h:27:15: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 1229996100002 * 809999700000 cannot be represented in type 'long' #0 0x7f63ace960e4 in mlir::ceilDiv(long, long) llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/Support/MathExtras.h:27:15 #1 0x7f63ace8587e in ceil llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/Analysis/Presburger/Fraction.h:57:42 #2 0x7f63ace8587e in operator* llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:347:42 #3 0x7f63ace8587e in uninitialized_copy<llvm::mapped_iterator<mlir::Fraction *, long (*)(mlir::Fraction), long>, long *> include/c++/v1/__memory/uninitialized_algorithms.h:36:62 #4 0x7f63ace8587e in uninitialized_copy<llvm::mapped_iterator<mlir::Fraction *, long (*)(mlir::Fraction), long>, long *> llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:490:5 #5 0x7f63ace8587e in append<llvm::mapped_iterator<mlir::Fraction *, long (*)(mlir::Fraction), long>, void> llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:662:5 #6 0x7f63ace8587e in SmallVector<llvm::mapped_iterator<mlir::Fraction *, long (*)(mlir::Fraction), long> > llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:1204:11 #7 0x7f63ace8587e in mlir::FlatAffineConstraints::findIntegerSample() const llvm-project/mlir/lib/Analysis/AffineStructures.cpp:1171:27 #8 0x7f63ae95a84d in mlir::checkSample(bool, mlir::FlatAffineConstraints const&, mlir::TestFunction) llvm-project/mlir/unittests/Analysis/AffineStructuresTest.cpp:37:23 #9 0x7f63ae957545 in mlir::FlatAffineConstraintsTest_FindSampleTest_Test::TestBody() llvm-project/mlir/unittests/Analysis/AffineStructuresTest.cpp:222:3
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2022
Segmentation fault in ompt_tsan_dependences function due to an unchecked NULL pointer dereference is as follows: ``` ThreadSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ==140865==ERROR: ThreadSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000050 (pc 0x7f217c2d3652 bp 0x7ffe8cfc7e00 sp 0x7ffe8cfc7d90 T140865) ==140865==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. ==140865==Hint: address points to the zero page. /usr/bin/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 1012a /usr/bin/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 133b5 /usr/bin/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 1371a /usr/bin/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 13a58 #0 ompt_tsan_dependences(ompt_data_t*, ompt_dependence_t const*, int) /ptmp/bhararit/llvm-project/openmp/tools/archer/ompt-tsan.cpp:1004 (libarcher.so+0x15652) #1 __kmpc_doacross_post /ptmp/bhararit/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/kmp_csupport.cpp:4280 (libomp.so+0x74d98) #2 .omp_outlined. for_ordered_01.c:? (for_ordered_01.exe+0x5186cb) #3 __kmp_invoke_microtask /ptmp/bhararit/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/z_Linux_asm.S:1166 (libomp.so+0x14e592) #4 __kmp_invoke_task_func /ptmp/bhararit/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/kmp_runtime.cpp:7556 (libomp.so+0x909ad) #5 __kmp_fork_call /ptmp/bhararit/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/kmp_runtime.cpp:2284 (libomp.so+0x8461a) #6 __kmpc_fork_call /ptmp/bhararit/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/kmp_csupport.cpp:308 (libomp.so+0x6db55) #7 main ??:? (for_ordered_01.exe+0x51828f) #8 __libc_start_main ??:? (libc.so.6+0x24349) #9 _start /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.26/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120 (for_ordered_01.exe+0x4214e9) ThreadSanitizer can not provide additional info. SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: SEGV /ptmp/bhararit/llvm-project/openmp/tools/archer/ompt-tsan.cpp:1004 in ompt_tsan_dependences(ompt_data_t*, ompt_dependence_t const*, int) ==140865==ABORTING ``` To reproduce the error, use the following openmp code snippet: ``` /* initialise testMatrixInt Matrix, cols, r and c */ #pragma omp parallel private(r,c) shared(testMatrixInt) { #pragma omp for ordered(2) for (r=1; r < rows; r++) { for (c=1; c < cols; c++) { #pragma omp ordered depend(sink:r-1, c+1) depend(sink:r-1,c-1) testMatrixInt[r][c] = (testMatrixInt[r-1][c] + testMatrixInt[r-1][c-1]) % cols ; #pragma omp ordered depend (source) } } } ``` Compilation: ``` clang -g -stdlib=libc++ -fsanitize=thread -fopenmp -larcher test_case.c ``` It seems like the changes introduced by the commit https://reviews.llvm.org/D114005 causes this particular SEGV while using Archer. Reviewed By: protze.joachim Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115328
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2022
We experienced some deadlocks when we used multiple threads for logging using `scan-builds` intercept-build tool when we used multiple threads by e.g. logging `make -j16` ``` (gdb) bt #0 0x00007f2bb3aff110 in __lll_lock_wait () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x00007f2bb3af70a3 in pthread_mutex_lock () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 #2 0x00007f2bb3d152e4 in ?? () #3 0x00007ffcc5f0cc80 in ?? () #4 0x00007f2bb3d2bf5b in ?? () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #5 0x00007f2bb3b5da27 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #6 0x00007f2bb3b5dbe0 in exit () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #7 0x00007f2bb3d144ee in ?? () #8 0x746e692f706d742f in ?? () #9 0x692d747065637265 in ?? () #10 0x2f653631326b3034 in ?? () #11 0x646d632e35353532 in ?? () #12 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () ``` I think the gcc's exit call caused the injected `libear.so` to be unloaded by the `ld`, which in turn called the `void on_unload() __attribute__((destructor))`. That tried to acquire an already locked mutex which was left locked in the `bear_report_call()` call, that probably encountered some error and returned early when it forgot to unlock the mutex. All of these are speculation since from the backtrace I could not verify if frames 2 and 3 are in fact corresponding to the `libear.so` module. But I think it's a fairly safe bet. So, hereby I'm releasing the held mutex on *all paths*, even if some failure happens. PS: I would use lock_guards, but it's C. Reviewed-by: NoQ Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118439
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2022
This patch fixes a data race in IOHandlerProcessSTDIO. The race is
happens between the main thread and the event handling thread. The main
thread is running the IOHandler (IOHandlerProcessSTDIO::Run()) when an
event comes in that makes us pop the process IO handler which involves
cancelling the IOHandler (IOHandlerProcessSTDIO::Cancel). The latter
calls SetIsDone(true) which modifies m_is_done. At the same time, we
have the main thread reading the variable through GetIsDone().
This patch avoids the race by using a mutex to synchronize the two
threads. On the event thread, in IOHandlerProcessSTDIO ::Cancel method,
we obtain the lock before changing the value of m_is_done. On the main
thread, in IOHandlerProcessSTDIO::Run(), we obtain the lock before
reading the value of m_is_done. Additionally, we delay calling SetIsDone
until after the loop exists, to avoid a potential race between the two
writes.
Write of size 1 at 0x00010b66bb68 by thread T7 (mutexes: write M2862, write M718324145051843688):
#0 lldb_private::IOHandler::SetIsDone(bool) IOHandler.h:90 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x971d84)
#1 IOHandlerProcessSTDIO::Cancel() Process.cpp:4382 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x5ddfec)
#2 lldb_private::Debugger::PopIOHandler(std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::IOHandler> const&) Debugger.cpp:1156 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x3cb2a8)
#3 lldb_private::Debugger::RemoveIOHandler(std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::IOHandler> const&) Debugger.cpp:1063 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x3cbd2c)
#4 lldb_private::Process::PopProcessIOHandler() Process.cpp:4487 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x5c583c)
#5 lldb_private::Debugger::HandleProcessEvent(std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Event> const&) Debugger.cpp:1549 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x3ceabc)
#6 lldb_private::Debugger::DefaultEventHandler() Debugger.cpp:1622 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x3cf2c0)
#7 std::__1::__function::__func<lldb_private::Debugger::StartEventHandlerThread()::$_2, std::__1::allocator<lldb_private::Debugger::StartEventHandlerThread()::$_2>, void* ()>::operator()() function.h:352 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x3d1bd8)
#8 lldb_private::HostNativeThreadBase::ThreadCreateTrampoline(void*) HostNativeThreadBase.cpp:62 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x4c71ac)
#9 lldb_private::HostThreadMacOSX::ThreadCreateTrampoline(void*) HostThreadMacOSX.mm:18 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x29ef544)
Previous read of size 1 at 0x00010b66bb68 by main thread:
#0 lldb_private::IOHandler::GetIsDone() IOHandler.h:92 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x971db8)
#1 IOHandlerProcessSTDIO::Run() Process.cpp:4339 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x5ddc7c)
#2 lldb_private::Debugger::RunIOHandlers() Debugger.cpp:982 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x3cb48c)
#3 lldb_private::CommandInterpreter::RunCommandInterpreter(lldb_private::CommandInterpreterRunOptions&) CommandInterpreter.cpp:3298 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x506478)
#4 lldb::SBDebugger::RunCommandInterpreter(bool, bool) SBDebugger.cpp:1166 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x53604)
#5 Driver::MainLoop() Driver.cpp:634 (lldb:arm64+0x100006294)
#6 main Driver.cpp:853 (lldb:arm64+0x100007344)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120762
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2022
For functions that require restoring SP from FP (e.g. that need to
align the stack, or that have variable sized allocations), the prologue
and epilogue previously used to look like this:
push {r4-r5, r11, lr}
add r11, sp, #8
...
sub r4, r11, #8
mov sp, r4
pop {r4-r5, r11, pc}
This is problematic, because this unwinding operation (restoring sp
from r11 - offset) can't be expressed with the SEH unwind opcodes
(probably because this unwind procedure doesn't map exactly to
individual instructions; note the detour via r4 in the epilogue too).
To make unwinding work, the GPR push is split into two; the first one
pushing all other registers, and the second one pushing r11+lr, so that
r11 can be set pointing at this spot on the stack:
push {r4-r5}
push {r11, lr}
mov r11, sp
...
mov sp, r11
pop {r11, lr}
pop {r4-r5}
bx lr
For the same setup, MSVC generates code that uses two registers;
r11 still pointing at the {r11,lr} pair, but a separate register
used for restoring the stack at the end:
push {r4-r5, r7, r11, lr}
add r11, sp, #12
mov r7, sp
...
mov sp, r7
pop {r4-r5, r7, r11, pc}
For cases with clobbered float/vector registers, they are pushed
after the GPRs, before the {r11,lr} pair.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125649
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2022
…mic types We observed a failed assert in overloaded compound-assignment operator resolution: ``` Assertion failed: (Result.isInvalid() && "C++ binary operator overloading is missing candidates!"), function CreateOverloadedBinOp, file SemaOverload.cpp, line 13944. ... frame #4: clang` clang::Sema::CreateOverloadedBinOp(..., Opc=BO_OrAssign, ..., PerformADL=true, AllowRewrittenCandidates=false, ...) at SemaOverload.cpp:13943 frame #5: clang` BuildOverloadedBinOp(..., Opc=BO_OrAssign, ...) at SemaExpr.cpp:15228 frame #6: clang` clang::Sema::BuildBinOp(..., Opc=BO_OrAssign, ...) at SemaExpr.cpp:15330 frame #7: clang` clang::Sema::ActOnBinOp(..., Kind=pipeequal, ...) at SemaExpr.cpp:15187 frame #8: clang` clang::Parser::ParseRHSOfBinaryExpression(..., MinPrec=Assignment) at ParseExpr.cpp:629 frame #9: clang` clang::Parser::ParseAssignmentExpression(..., isTypeCast=NotTypeCast) at ParseExpr.cpp:176 frame #10: clang` clang::Parser::ParseExpression(... isTypeCast=NotTypeCast) at ParseExpr.cpp:124 frame #11: clang` clang::Parser::ParseExprStatement(...) at ParseStmt.cpp:464 ``` A simple reproducer is: ``` _Atomic unsigned an_atomic_uint; enum { an_enum_value = 1 }; void enum1() { an_atomic_uint += an_enum_value; } ``` This patch fixes the issue by generating builtin operator overloads for (volatile) _Atomic types. Reviewed By: aaron.ballman Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125349
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 9, 2022
…ned form
The DWARF spec says:
Any debugging information entry representing the declaration of an object,
module, subprogram or type may have DW_AT_decl_file, DW_AT_decl_line and
DW_AT_decl_column attributes, each of whose value is an unsigned integer
^^^^^^^^
constant.
If however, a producer happens to emit DW_AT_decl_file /
DW_AT_decl_line using a signed integer form, llvm-dwarfdump crashes,
like so:
(... snip ...)
0x000000b4: DW_TAG_structure_type
DW_AT_name ("test_struct")
DW_AT_byte_size (136)
DW_AT_decl_file (llvm-dwarfdump: (... snip ...)/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h:197: T& llvm::optional_detail::OptionalStorage<T, true>::getValue() &
[with T = long unsigned int]: Assertion `hasVal' failed.
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace.
Stack dump:
0. Program arguments: /opt/rocm/llvm/bin/llvm-dwarfdump ./testsuite/outputs/gdb.rocm/lane-pc-vega20/lane-pc-vega20-kernel.so
#0 0x000055cc8e78315f PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) Signals.cpp:0:0
#1 0x000055cc8e780d3d SignalHandler(int) Signals.cpp:0:0
#2 0x00007f8f2cae8420 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x14420)
#3 0x00007f8f2c58d00b raise /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51:1
#4 0x00007f8f2c56c859 abort /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/stdlib/abort.c:81:7
#5 0x00007f8f2c56c729 get_sysdep_segment_value /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/intl/loadmsgcat.c:509:8
#6 0x00007f8f2c56c729 _nl_load_domain /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/intl/loadmsgcat.c:970:34
#7 0x00007f8f2c57dfd6 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x33fd6)
#8 0x000055cc8e58ceb9 llvm::DWARFDie::dump(llvm::raw_ostream&, unsigned int, llvm::DIDumpOptions) const (/opt/rocm/llvm/bin/llvm-dwarfdump+0x2e0eb9)
#9 0x000055cc8e58bec3 llvm::DWARFDie::dump(llvm::raw_ostream&, unsigned int, llvm::DIDumpOptions) const (/opt/rocm/llvm/bin/llvm-dwarfdump+0x2dfec3)
#10 0x000055cc8e5b28a3 llvm::DWARFCompileUnit::dump(llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::DIDumpOptions) (.part.21) DWARFCompileUnit.cpp:0:0
Likewise with DW_AT_call_file / DW_AT_call_line.
The problem is that the code in llvm/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFDie.cpp
dumping these attributes assumes that
FormValue.getAsUnsignedConstant() returns an armed optional. If in
debug mode, we get an assertion line the above. If in release mode,
and asserts are compiled out, then we proceed as if the optional had a
value, running into undefined behavior, printing whatever random
value.
Fix this by checking whether the optional returned by
FormValue.getAsUnsignedConstant() has a value, like done in other
places.
In addition, DWARFVerifier.cpp is validating DW_AT_call_file /
DW_AT_decl_file, but not AT_call_line / DW_AT_decl_line. This commit
fixes that too.
The llvm-dwarfdump/X86/verify_file_encoding.yaml testcase is extended
to cover these cases. Current llvm-dwarfdump crashes running the
newly-extended test.
"make check-llvm-tools-llvm-dwarfdump" shows no regressions, on x86-64
GNU/Linux.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129392
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2022
Commit de3445e (https://reviews.llvm.org/D132096) made changes to isVectorPromotionViable basically doing // Create Vector with size of V, and each element of type Ty ... uint64_t ElementSize = DL.getTypeStoreSizeInBits(Ty).getFixedSize(); uint64_t VectorSize = DL.getTypeSizeInBits(V).getFixedSize(); ... VectorType *VTy = VectorType::get(Ty, VectorSize / ElementSize, false); Not quite sure why it uses the TypeStoreSize for the ElementSize, but the new vector would only match in size with the old vector in situations when the TypeStoreSize equals the TypeSize for Ty. Therefore this patch adds a typeSizeEqualsStoreSize check as yet another condition for allowing the the new type as a promotion candidate. Without this fix the new @test15 test would fail with an assert like this: opt: ../lib/Transforms/Scalar/SROA.cpp:1966: auto isVectorPromotionViable(llvm::sroa::Partition &, const llvm::DataLayout &) ::(anonymous class)::operator()(llvm::VectorType *, llvm::VectorType *) const: Assertion `DL.getTypeSizeInBits(RHSTy).getFixedSize() == DL.getTypeSizeInBits(LHSTy).getFixedSize() && "Cannot have vector types of different sizes!"' failed. ... #8 isVectorPromotionViable(...)::$_10::operator()... #9 llvm::SROAPass::rewritePartition(...) #10 llvm::SROAPass::splitAlloca(...) #11 llvm::SROAPass::runOnAlloca(...) #12 llvm::SROAPass::runImpl(...) #13 llvm::SROAPass::run(...) Reviewed By: MatzeB Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134032
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2022
Found by msan -fsanitize-memory-use-after-dtor.
==8259==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0x55dbec54d2b8 in dtorRecord(clang::interp::Block*, char*, clang::interp::Descriptor*) clang/lib/AST/Interp/Descriptor.cpp:150:22
#1 0x55dbec54bfcf in dtorArrayDesc(clang::interp::Block*, char*, clang::interp::Descriptor*) clang/lib/AST/Interp/Descriptor.cpp:97:7
#2 0x55dbec508578 in invokeDtor clang/lib/AST/Interp/InterpBlock.h:79:7
#3 0x55dbec508578 in clang::interp::Program::~Program() clang/lib/AST/Interp/Program.h:55:19
#4 0x55dbec50657a in operator() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:55:5
#5 0x55dbec50657a in std::__msan::unique_ptr<clang::interp::Program, std::__msan::default_delete<clang::interp::Program>>::~unique_ptr() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:261:7
#6 0x55dbec5035a1 in clang::interp::Context::~Context() clang/lib/AST/Interp/Context.cpp:27:22
#7 0x55dbebec1daa in operator() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:55:5
#8 0x55dbebec1daa in std::__msan::unique_ptr<clang::interp::Context, std::__msan::default_delete<clang::interp::Context>>::~unique_ptr() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:261:7
#9 0x55dbebe285f9 in clang::ASTContext::~ASTContext() clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:1038:40
#10 0x55dbe941ff13 in llvm::RefCountedBase<clang::ASTContext>::Release() const llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:101:7
#11 0x55dbe94353ef in release llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:159:38
#12 0x55dbe94353ef in release llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:224:7
#13 0x55dbe94353ef in ~IntrusiveRefCntPtr llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:191:27
#14 0x55dbe94353ef in clang::CompilerInstance::setASTContext(clang::ASTContext*) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:178:3
#15 0x55dbe95ad0ad in clang::FrontendAction::EndSourceFile() clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:1100:8
#16 0x55dbe9445fcf in clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:1047:11
#17 0x55dbe6b3afef in clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:266:25
#18 0x55dbe6b13288 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:250:15
#19 0x55dbe6b0095f in ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&) clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:319:12
#20 0x55dbe6aff41c in clang_main(int, char**) clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:395:12
#21 0x7f9be07fa632 in __libc_start_main
#22 0x55dbe6a702e9 in _start
Member fields were destroyed
#0 0x55dbe6a7da5d in __sanitizer_dtor_callback_fields compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:949:5
#1 0x55dbec5094ac in ~SmallVectorImpl llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:479:7
#2 0x55dbec5094ac in ~SmallVectorImpl llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:612:3
#3 0x55dbec5094ac in llvm::SmallVector<clang::interp::Record::Base, 8u>::~SmallVector() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:1207:3
#4 0x55dbec508e79 in clang::interp::Record::~Record() clang/lib/AST/Interp/Record.h:24:7
#5 0x55dbec508612 in clang::interp::Program::~Program() clang/lib/AST/Interp/Program.h:49:26
#6 0x55dbec50657a in operator() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:55:5
#7 0x55dbec50657a in std::__msan::unique_ptr<clang::interp::Program, std::__msan::default_delete<clang::interp::Program>>::~unique_ptr() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:261:7
#8 0x55dbec5035a1 in clang::interp::Context::~Context() clang/lib/AST/Interp/Context.cpp:27:22
#9 0x55dbebec1daa in operator() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:55:5
#10 0x55dbebec1daa in std::__msan::unique_ptr<clang::interp::Context, std::__msan::default_delete<clang::interp::Context>>::~unique_ptr() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:261:7
#11 0x55dbebe285f9 in clang::ASTContext::~ASTContext() clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:1038:40
#12 0x55dbe941ff13 in llvm::RefCountedBase<clang::ASTContext>::Release() const llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:101:7
#13 0x55dbe94353ef in release llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:159:38
#14 0x55dbe94353ef in release llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:224:7
#15 0x55dbe94353ef in ~IntrusiveRefCntPtr llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:191:27
#16 0x55dbe94353ef in clang::CompilerInstance::setASTContext(clang::ASTContext*) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:178:3
#17 0x55dbe95ad0ad in clang::FrontendAction::EndSourceFile() clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:1100:8
#18 0x55dbe9445fcf in clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:1047:11
#19 0x55dbe6b3afef in clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:266:25
#20 0x55dbe6b13288 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:250:15
#21 0x55dbe6b0095f in ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&) clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:319:12
#22 0x55dbe6aff41c in clang_main(int, char**) clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:395:12
#23 0x7f9be07fa632 in __libc_start_main
#24 0x55dbe6a702e9 in _start
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2022
For the following program,
$ cat t.c
struct t {
int (__attribute__((btf_type_tag("rcu"))) *f)();
int a;
};
int foo(struct t *arg) {
return arg->a;
}
Compiling with 'clang -g -O2 -S t.c' will cause a failure like below:
clang: /home/yhs/work/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp:6391: void {anonymous}::DeclaratorLocFiller::VisitParenTypeLoc(clang::ParenTypeLoc):
Assertion `Chunk.Kind == DeclaratorChunk::Paren' failed.
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script.
Stack dump:
......
#5 0x00007f89e4280ea5 abort (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x21ea5)
#6 0x00007f89e4280d79 _nl_load_domain.cold.0 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x21d79)
#7 0x00007f89e42a6456 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x47456)
#8 0x00000000045c2596 GetTypeSourceInfoForDeclarator((anonymous namespace)::TypeProcessingState&, clang::QualType, clang::TypeSourceInfo*) SemaType.cpp:0:0
#9 0x00000000045ccfa5 GetFullTypeForDeclarator((anonymous namespace)::TypeProcessingState&, clang::QualType, clang::TypeSourceInfo*) SemaType.cpp:0:0
......
The reason of the failure is due to the mismatch of TypeLoc and D.getTypeObject().Kind. For example,
the TypeLoc is
BTFTagAttributedType 0x88614e0 'int btf_type_tag(rcu)()' sugar
|-ParenType 0x8861480 'int ()' sugar
| `-FunctionNoProtoType 0x8861450 'int ()' cdecl
| `-BuiltinType 0x87fd500 'int'
while corresponding D.getTypeObject().Kind points to DeclaratorChunk::Paren, and
this will cause later assertion.
To fix the issue, similar to AttributedTypeLoc, let us skip BTFTagAttributedTypeLoc in
GetTypeSourceInfoForDeclarator().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136807
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2022
…ction selection. Before this patch: - For `r = or op0, op1`, `tryBitfieldInsertOpFromOr` combines it to BFI when 1) one of the two operands is bit-field-positioning or bit-field-extraction op; and 2) bits from the two operands don't overlap After this patch: - Right before OR is combined to BFI, evaluates if ORR with left-shifted operand is better. A motivating example (https://godbolt.org/z/rnMrzs5vn, which is added as a test case in `test_orr_not_bfi` in `CodeGen/AArch64/bitfield-insert.ll`) For IR: ``` define i64 @test_orr_not_bfxil(i64 %0) { %2 = and i64 %0, 127 %3 = lshr i64 %0, 1 %4 = and i64 %3, 16256 %5 = or i64 %4, %2 ret i64 %5 } ``` Before: ``` lsr x8, x0, #1 and x8, x8, #0x3f80 bfxil x8, x0, #0, #7 ``` After: ``` ubfx x8, x0, #8, #7 and x9, x0, #0x7f orr x0, x9, x8, lsl #7 ``` Reviewed By: dmgreen Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135102
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2022
…i variadic functions." This reverts commit 56fd846. This commit regressed handling of functions with floats as arguments, reproducible e.g. like this: $ cat test.c double func(double f) { return f; } $ clang -target aarch64-windows -S -o - test.c -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables func: sub sp, sp, #16 str x0, [sp, #8] ldr d0, [sp, #8] add sp, sp, #16 ret
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2022
…D112621 It seems like `LHS` and `RHS` could be empty range sets. This caused an assertion failure inside RangeConstraintManager. I'm hoisting out the check from the function into the call-site. This way we could assert that we only want to deal with non-empty range sets. The relevant part of the trace: ``` #6 0x00007fe6ff5f81a6 __assert_fail_base (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2f1a6) #7 0x00007fe6ff5f8252 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2f252) #8 0x00000000049caed2 (anonymous namespace)::SymbolicRangeInferrer::VisitBinaryOperator(clang::ento::RangeSet, clang::BinaryOperatorKind, clang::ento::RangeSet, clang::QualType) RangeConstraintManager.cpp:0:0 #9 0x00000000049c9867 (anonymous namespace)::SymbolicRangeInferrer::infer(clang::ento::SymExpr const*) RangeConstraintManager.cpp:0:0 #10 0x00000000049bebf5 (anonymous namespace)::RangeConstraintManager::assumeSymNE(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::SymExpr const*, llvm::APSInt const&, llvm::APSInt const&) RangeConstraintManager.cpp:0:0 #11 0x00000000049d368c clang::ento::RangedConstraintManager::assumeSymUnsupported(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::SymExpr const*, bool) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x49d368c) #12 0x00000000049f0b09 clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager::assumeAux(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::NonLoc, bool) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x49f0b09) #13 0x00000000049f096a clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager::assume(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::NonLoc, bool) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x49f096a) #14 0x00000000049f086d clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager::assumeInternal(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::DefinedSVal, bool) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x49f086d) #15 0x000000000492d3e3 clang::ento::ConstraintManager::assumeDual(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::DefinedSVal) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x492d3e3) #16 0x0000000004955b6d clang::ento::ExprEngine::evalEagerlyAssumeBinOpBifurcation(clang::ento::ExplodedNodeSet&, clang::ento::ExplodedNodeSet&, clang::Expr const*) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x4955b6d) #17 0x00000000049514b6 clang::ento::ExprEngine::Visit(clang::Stmt const*, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*, clang::ento::ExplodedNodeSet&) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x49514b6) #18 0x000000000494c73e clang::ento::ExprEngine::ProcessStmt(clang::Stmt const*, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x494c73e) #19 0x000000000494c459 clang::ento::ExprEngine::processCFGElement(clang::CFGElement, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*, unsigned int, clang::ento::NodeBuilderContext*) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x494c459) #20 0x000000000492f3d0 clang::ento::CoreEngine::HandlePostStmt(clang::CFGBlock const*, unsigned int, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x492f3d0) #21 0x000000000492e1f6 clang::ento::CoreEngine::ExecuteWorkList(clang::LocationContext const*, unsigned int, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>) (../../main-github/llvm/build-all/bin/clang+0x492e1f6) ``` Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112621
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 21, 2023
When building/testing ASan inside the GCC tree on Solaris while using GNU `ld` instead of Solaris `ld`, a large number of tests SEGVs on both sparc and x86 like this: Thread 2 received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 1 (LWP 1)] 0xfe014cfc in __sanitizer::atomic_load<__sanitizer::atomic_uintptr_t> (a=0xfc602a58, mo=__sanitizer::memory_order_acquire) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_atomic_clang_x86.h:46 46 v = a->val_dont_use; 1: x/i $pc => 0xfe014cfc <_ZN11__sanitizer11atomic_loadINS_16atomic_uintptr_tEEENT_4TypeEPVKS2_NS_12memory_orderE+62>: mov (%eax),%eax (gdb) bt #0 0xfe014cfc in __sanitizer::atomic_load<__sanitizer::atomic_uintptr_t> (a=0xfc602a58, mo=__sanitizer::memory_order_acquire) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_atomic_clang_x86.h:46 #1 0xfe0bd1d7 in __sanitizer::DTLS_NextBlock (cur=0xfc602a58) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_tls_get_addr.cpp:53 #2 0xfe0bd319 in __sanitizer::DTLS_Find (id=1) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_tls_get_addr.cpp:77 #3 0xfe0bd466 in __sanitizer::DTLS_on_tls_get_addr (arg_void=0xfeffd068, res=0xfe602a18, static_tls_begin=0, static_tls_end=0) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_tls_get_addr.cpp:116 #4 0xfe063f81 in __interceptor___tls_get_addr (arg=0xfeffd068) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:5501 #5 0xfe0a3054 in __sanitizer::CollectStaticTlsBlocks (info=0xfeffd108, size=40, data=0xfeffd16c) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:366 #6 0xfe6ba9fa in dl_iterate_phdr () from /usr/lib/ld.so.1 #7 0xfe0a3132 in __sanitizer::GetStaticTlsBoundary (addr=0xfe608020, size=0xfeffd244, align=0xfeffd1b0) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:382 #8 0xfe0a33f7 in __sanitizer::GetTls (addr=0xfe608020, size=0xfeffd244) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:482 #9 0xfe0a34b1 in __sanitizer::GetThreadStackAndTls (main=true, stk_addr=0xfe608010, stk_size=0xfeffd240, tls_addr=0xfe608020, tls_size=0xfeffd244) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:565 The address being accessed is unmapped. However, even when the tests `PASS` with Solaris `ld`, `ASAN_OPTIONS=verbosity=2` shows ==6582==__tls_get_addr: Can't guess glibc version Given that that the code is stricly `glibc`-specific according to `sanitizer_tls_get_addr.h`, there seems little point in using the interceptor on non-`glibc` targets. That's what this patch does. Tested on `i386-pc-solaris2.11` and `sparc-sun-solaris2.11` inside the GCC tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141385
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2023
…ak ordering
`std::sort` requires a comparison operator that obides by strict weak
ordering. `operator<=` on pointer does not and leads to undefined
behaviour. Specifically, when we grow the `scratch_type_systems` vector
slightly larger (and thus take `std::sort` down a slightly different
codepath), we segfault. This happened while working on a patch that
would in fact grow this vector. In such a case ASAN reports:
```
$ ./bin/lldb ./lldb-test-build.noindex/lang/cpp/complete-type-check/TestCppIsTypeComplete.test_builtin_types/a.out -o "script -- lldb.target.FindFirstType(\"void\")"
(lldb) script -- lldb.target.FindFirstType("void")
=================================================================
==59975==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: container-overflow on address 0x000108f6b510 at pc 0x000280177b4c bp 0x00016b7d7430 sp 0x00016b7d7428
READ of size 8 at 0x000108f6b510 thread T0
#0 0x280177b48 in std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>::shared_ptr[abi:v15006](std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&)+0xb4 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x177b48)
(BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#1 0x280dcc008 in void std::__1::__introsort<std::__1::_ClassicAlgPolicy, lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)::$_3&, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*>(std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*, std::__1::shared_
ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*, lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)::$_3&, std::__1::iterator_traits<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*>::difference_type)+0x1050 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblld
b.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xdcc008) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#2 0x280d88788 in lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)+0x5a4 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xd88788) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#3 0x28021f0b4 in lldb::SBTarget::FindFirstType(char const*)+0x624 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x21f0b4) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#4 0x2804e9590 in _wrap_SBTarget_FindFirstType(_object*, _object*)+0x26c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x4e9590) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#5 0x1062d3ad4 in cfunction_call+0x5c (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.11/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0xcfad4) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00)
<--- snipped --->
0x000108f6b510 is located 400 bytes inside of 512-byte region [0x000108f6b380,0x000108f6b580)
allocated by thread T0 here:
#0 0x105209414 in wrap__Znwm+0x74 (/Applications/Xcode2.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/lib/clang/14.0.3/lib/darwin/libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:arm64e+0x51414) (BuildId: 0a44828ceb64337bbfff60b22cd838f0320000
00200000000100000000000b00)
#1 0x280dca3b4 in std::__1::__split_buffer<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>&>::__split_buffer(unsigned long, unsigned long, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_pt
r<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>&)+0x11c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xdca3b4) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#2 0x280dc978c in void std::__1::vector<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>>::__push_back_slow_path<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&>(std::__1::s
hared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&)+0x13c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xdc978c) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#3 0x280d88dec in std::__1::vector<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>>::push_back[abi:v15006](std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&)+0x80 (/Users/mic
haelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xd88dec) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#4 0x280d8857c in lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)+0x398 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xd8857c) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#5 0x28021f0b4 in lldb::SBTarget::FindFirstType(char const*)+0x624 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x21f0b4) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#6 0x2804e9590 in _wrap_SBTarget_FindFirstType(_object*, _object*)+0x26c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x4e9590) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#7 0x1062d3ad4 in cfunction_call+0x5c (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.11/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0xcfad4) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00)
#8 0x10627fff0 in _PyObject_MakeTpCall+0x7c (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.11/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0x7bff0) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00)
#9 0x106378a98 in _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault+0xbcf8 (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.11/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0x174a98) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00)
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142709
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2023
This change prevents rare deadlocks observed for specific macOS/iOS GUI
applications which issue many `dlopen()` calls from multiple different
threads at startup and where TSan finds and reports a race during
startup. Providing a reliable test for this has been deemed infeasible.
Although I've only observed this deadlock on Apple platforms,
conceptually the cause is not confined to Apple code so the fix lives in
platform-independent code.
Deadlock scenario:
```
Thread 2 | Thread 4
ReportRace() |
Lock internal TSan mutexes |
&ctx->slot_mtx |
| dlopen() interceptor
| OnLibraryLoaded()
| MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules()
| calls dyld API, which takes internal lock
| lock() interceptor
| TSan tries to take internal mutexes again
| &ctx->slot_mtx
call into symbolizer |
MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules()
calls dyld API, which hangs on trying to take lock
```
Resulting in:
* Thread 2 has internal TSan mutex, blocked on dyld lock
* Thread 4 has dyld lock, blocked on internal TSan mutex
The fix prevents this situation by not intercepting any of the calls
originating from `MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules()`.
Stack traces for deadlock between ReportRace() and dlopen() interceptor:
```
thread #2, queue = 'com.apple.root.default-qos'
frame #0: libsystem_kernel.dylib
frame #1: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::wrap_os_unfair_lock_lock_with_options(lock=<unavailable>, options=<unavailable>) at tsan_interceptors_mac.cpp:306:3
frame #2: dyld`dyld4::RuntimeLocks::withLoadersReadLock(this=0x000000016f21b1e0, work=0x00000001814523c0) block_pointer) at DyldRuntimeState.cpp:227:28
frame #3: dyld`dyld4::APIs::_dyld_get_image_header(this=0x0000000101012a20, imageIndex=614) at DyldAPIs.cpp:240:11
frame #4: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::CurrentImageHeader(this=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:391:35
frame #5: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::Next(this=0x000000016f2a2800, segment=0x000000016f2a2738) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:397:51
frame #6: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules(this=0x000000016f2a2800, modules=0x00000001011000a0) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:460:10
frame #7: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::ListOfModules::init(this=0x00000001011000a0) at sanitizer_mac.cpp:610:18
frame #8: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Symbolizer::FindModuleForAddress(unsigned long) [inlined] __sanitizer::Symbolizer::RefreshModules(this=0x0000000101100078) at sanitizer_symbolizer_libcdep.cpp:185:12
frame #9: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Symbolizer::FindModuleForAddress(this=0x0000000101100078, address=6465454512) at sanitizer_symbolizer_libcdep.cpp:204:5
frame #10: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Symbolizer::SymbolizePC(this=0x0000000101100078, addr=6465454512) at sanitizer_symbolizer_libcdep.cpp:88:15
frame #11: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::SymbolizeCode(addr=6465454512) at tsan_symbolize.cpp:106:35
frame #12: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::SymbolizeStack(trace=StackTrace @ 0x0000600002d66d00) at tsan_rtl_report.cpp:112:28
frame #13: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedReportBase::AddMemoryAccess(this=0x000000016f2a2a90, addr=4381057136, external_tag=<unavailable>, s=<unavailable>, tid=<unavailable>, stack=<unavailable>, mset=0x00000001012fc310) at tsan_rtl_report.cpp:190:16
frame #14: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ReportRace(thr=0x00000001012fc000, shadow_mem=0x000008020a4340e0, cur=<unavailable>, old=<unavailable>, typ0=1) at tsan_rtl_report.cpp:795:9
frame #15: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::DoReportRace(thr=0x00000001012fc000, shadow_mem=0x000008020a4340e0, cur=Shadow @ x22, old=Shadow @ 0x0000600002d6b4f0, typ=1) at tsan_rtl_access.cpp:166:3
frame #16: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::__tsan_read8(void *) at tsan_rtl_access.cpp:220:5
frame #17: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::__tsan_read8(void *) [inlined] __tsan::MemoryAccess(thr=0x00000001012fc000, pc=<unavailable>, addr=<unavailable>, size=8, typ=1) at tsan_rtl_access.cpp:442:3
frame #18: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::__tsan_read8(addr=<unavailable>) at tsan_interface.inc:34:3
<call into TSan from from instrumented code>
thread #4, queue = 'com.apple.dock.fullscreen'
frame #0: libsystem_kernel.dylib
frame #1: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::FutexWait(p=<unavailable>, cmp=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_mac.cpp:540:3
frame #2: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Semaphore::Wait(this=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_mutex.cpp:35:7
frame #3: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Mutex::Lock(this=0x0000000102992a80) at sanitizer_mutex.h:196:18
frame #4: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() [inlined] __sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock(this=<unavailable>, mu=0x0000000102992a80) at sanitizer_mutex.h:383:10
frame #5: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() [inlined] __sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock(this=<unavailable>, mu=0x0000000102992a80) at sanitizer_mutex.h:382:77
frame #6: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() at tsan_rtl.h:708:10
frame #7: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() [inlined] __tsan::TryTraceFunc(thr=0x000000010f084000, pc=0) at tsan_rtl.h:751:7
frame #8: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() [inlined] __tsan::FuncExit(thr=0x000000010f084000) at tsan_rtl.h:798:7
frame #9: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor(this=0x000000016f3ba280) at tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:300:5
frame #10: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor(this=<unavailable>) at tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:293:41
frame #11: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::wrap_os_unfair_lock_lock_with_options(lock=0x000000016f21b1e8, options=OS_UNFAIR_LOCK_NONE) at tsan_interceptors_mac.cpp:310:1
frame #12: dyld`dyld4::RuntimeLocks::withLoadersReadLock(this=0x000000016f21b1e0, work=0x00000001814525d4) block_pointer) at DyldRuntimeState.cpp:227:28
frame #13: dyld`dyld4::APIs::_dyld_get_image_vmaddr_slide(this=0x0000000101012a20, imageIndex=412) at DyldAPIs.cpp:273:11
frame #14: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::Next(__sanitizer::MemoryMappedSegment*) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:286:17
frame #15: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::Next(this=0x000000016f3ba560, segment=0x000000016f3ba498) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:432:15
frame #16: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules(this=0x000000016f3ba560, modules=0x000000016f3ba618) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:460:10
frame #17: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::ListOfModules::init(this=0x000000016f3ba618) at sanitizer_mac.cpp:610:18
frame #18: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::LibIgnore::OnLibraryLoaded(this=0x0000000101f3aa40, name="<some library>") at sanitizer_libignore.cpp:54:11
frame #19: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::wrap_dlopen(filename="<some library>", flag=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:6466:3
<library code>
```
rdar://106766395
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146593
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2023
[ARM] generate armv6m eXecute Only (XO) code for immediates, globals Previously eXecute Only (XO) support was implemented for targets that support MOVW/MOVT (~armv7+). See: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27449 XO prevents the compiler from generating data accesses to code sections. This patch implements XO codegen for armv6-M, which does not support MOVW/MOVT, and must resort to the following general pattern to avoid loads: movs r3, :upper8_15:foo lsls r3, #8 adds r3, :upper0_7:foo lsls r3, #8 adds r3, :lower8_15:foo lsls r3, #8 adds r3, :lower0_7:foo ldr r3, [r3] This is equivalent to the code pattern generated by GCC. The above relocations are new to LLVM and have been implemented in a parent patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149443. This patch limits itself to implementing codegen for this pattern and enabling XO for armv6-M in the backend. Separate patches will follow for: - switch tables - replacing specific loads from constant islands which are spread out over the ARM backend codebase. Amongst others: FastISel, call lowering, stack frames. Reviewed By: john.brawn Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152795
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2023
…tput The crash happens in clang::driver::tools::SplitDebugName when Output is InputInfo::Nothing. It doesn't happen with standalone clang driver because output is created in Driver::BuildJobsForActionNoCache. Example backtrace: ``` * thread #1, name = 'clangd', stop reason = hit program assert * frame #0: 0x00007ffff5c4eacf libc.so.6`raise + 271 frame #1: 0x00007ffff5c21ea5 libc.so.6`abort + 295 frame #2: 0x00007ffff5c21d79 libc.so.6`__assert_fail_base.cold.0 + 15 frame #3: 0x00007ffff5c47426 libc.so.6`__assert_fail + 70 frame #4: 0x000055555dc0923c clangd`clang::driver::InputInfo::getFilename(this=0x00007fffffff9398) const at InputInfo.h:84:5 frame #5: 0x000055555dcd0d8d clangd`clang::driver::tools::SplitDebugName(JA=0x000055555f6c6a50, Args=0x000055555f6d0b80, Input=0x00007fffffff9678, Output=0x00007fffffff9398) at CommonArgs.cpp:1275:40 frame #6: 0x000055555dc955a5 clangd`clang::driver::tools::Clang::ConstructJob(this=0x000055555f6c69d0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, JA=0x000055555f6c6a50, Output=0x00007fffffff9398, Inputs=0x00007fffffff9668, Args=0x000055555f6d0b80, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000) const at Clang.cpp:5690:33 frame #7: 0x000055555dbf6b54 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobsForActionNoCache(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, A=0x000055555f6c6a50, TC=0x000055555f6c4be0, BoundArch=(Data = 0x0000000000000000, Length = 0), AtTopLevel=true, MultipleArchs=false, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000, CachedResults=size=1, TargetDeviceOffloadKind=OFK_None) const at Driver.cpp:5618:10 frame #8: 0x000055555dbf4ef0 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobsForAction(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, A=0x000055555f6c6a50, TC=0x000055555f6c4be0, BoundArch=(Data = 0x0000000000000000, Length = 0), AtTopLevel=true, MultipleArchs=false, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000, CachedResults=size=1, TargetDeviceOffloadKind=OFK_None) const at Driver.cpp:5306:26 frame #9: 0x000055555dbeb590 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobs(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0) const at Driver.cpp:4844:5 frame #10: 0x000055555dbe6b0f clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildCompilation(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, ArgList=ArrayRef<const char *> @ 0x00007fffffffb268) at Driver.cpp:1496:3 frame #11: 0x000055555b0cc0d9 clangd`clang::createInvocation(ArgList=ArrayRef<const char *> @ 0x00007fffffffbb38, Opts=CreateInvocationOptions @ 0x00007fffffffbb90) at CreateInvocationFromCommandLine.cpp:53:52 frame #12: 0x000055555b378e7b clangd`clang::clangd::buildCompilerInvocation(Inputs=0x00007fffffffca58, D=0x00007fffffffc158, CC1Args=size=0) at Compiler.cpp:116:44 frame #13: 0x000055555895a6c8 clangd`clang::clangd::(anonymous namespace)::Checker::buildInvocation(this=0x00007fffffffc760, TFS=0x00007fffffffe570, Contents= Has Value=false ) at Check.cpp:212:9 frame #14: 0x0000555558959cec clangd`clang::clangd::check(File=(Data = "build/test.cpp", Length = 64), TFS=0x00007fffffffe570, Opts=0x00007fffffffe600) at Check.cpp:486:34 frame #15: 0x000055555892164a clangd`main(argc=4, argv=0x00007fffffffecd8) at ClangdMain.cpp:993:12 frame #16: 0x00007ffff5c3ad85 libc.so.6`__libc_start_main + 229 frame #17: 0x00005555585bbe9e clangd`_start + 46 ``` Test Plan: ninja ClangDriverTests && tools/clang/unittests/Driver/ClangDriverTests Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154602
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 28, 2023
This reverts commit 0e63f1a. clang-format started to crash with contents like: a.h: ``` ``` $ clang-format a.h ``` PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: ../llvm/build/bin/clang-format a.h #0 0x0000560b689fe177 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:723:13 #1 0x0000560b689fbfbe llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:106:18 #2 0x0000560b689feaca SignalHandler(int) /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:413:1 #3 0x00007f030405a540 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3c540) #4 0x0000560b68a9a980 is /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/include/clang/Lex/Token.h:98:44 #5 0x0000560b68a9a980 is /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h:562:51 #6 0x0000560b68a9a980 startsSequenceInternal<clang::tok::TokenKind, clang::tok::TokenKind> /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h:831:9 #7 0x0000560b68a9a980 startsSequence<clang::tok::TokenKind, clang::tok::TokenKind> /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h:600:12 #8 0x0000560b68a9a980 getFunctionName /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:3131:17 #9 0x0000560b68a9a980 clang::format::TokenAnnotator::annotate(clang::format::AnnotatedLine&) /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:3191:17 Segmentation fault ```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See Commits and Changes for more details.
Created by
pull[bot]
Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )