[Snyk] Fix for 3 vulnerabilities #2
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade: - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-MINIMIST-559764 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-MOCHA-561476 - https://snyk.io/vuln/npm:diff:20180305
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2021
This reverts commit 5cd63e9. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51707 The sequence feeding in/out of the rev32/ushr isn't quite right: _swap: ldr h0, [x0] ldr h1, [x0, #2] - mov v0.h[1], v1.h[0] + mov v0.s[1], v1.s[0] rev32 v0.8b, v0.8b ushr v0.2s, v0.2s, #16 - mov h1, v0.h[1] + mov s1, v0.s[1] str h0, [x0] str h1, [x0, #2] ret
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2021
This reverts commit a2768b4. Breaks sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast buildbot: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/11334 Log snippet: Testing: 0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80 FAIL: LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll (65549 of 78729) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll' FAILED ******************** Script: -- : 'RUN: at line 1'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll -instcombine -sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/einline.prof -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll -- Exit Code: 2 Command Output (stderr): -- /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'llvm::sampleprof::FunctionSamples' #0 0x5a730f8 in shouldInlineCandidate /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53 #1 0x5a730f8 in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::tryInlineCandidate((anonymous namespace)::InlineCandidate&, llvm::SmallVector<llvm::CallBase*, 8u>*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1178:21 #2 0x5a6cda6 in inlineHotFunctions /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1105:13 #3 0x5a6cda6 in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::emitAnnotations(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1633:16 #4 0x5a5fcbe in runOnFunction /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:2008:12 #5 0x5a5fcbe in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::runOnModule(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>*, llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo*, llvm::CallGraph*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1922:15 #6 0x5a5de55 in llvm::SampleProfileLoaderPass::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:2038:21 #7 0x6552a01 in llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::SampleProfileLoaderPass, llvm::PreservedAnalyses, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module> >::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:88:17 #8 0x57f807c in llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module> >::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:526:21 #9 0x37c8522 in llvm::runPassPipeline(llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module&, llvm::TargetMachine*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfoImpl*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::StringRef, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::StringRef>, llvm::opt_tool::OutputKind, llvm::opt_tool::VerifierKind, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/NewPMDriver.cpp:489:7 #10 0x37e7c11 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp:830:12 #11 0x7fbf4de4009a in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2409a) #12 0x379e519 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt+0x379e519) SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53 in FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty. FileCheck command line: /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll -- ******************** Testing: 0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80 FAIL: LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll (65643 of 78729) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll' FAILED ******************** Script: -- : 'RUN: at line 4'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/inline-cold.prof -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=NOTINLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll : 'RUN: at line 5'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -passes=sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/inline-cold.prof -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=NOTINLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll : 'RUN: at line 8'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/inline-cold.prof -sample-profile-inline-size -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=INLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll : 'RUN: at line 11'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -passes=sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/inline-cold.prof -sample-profile-inline-size -sample-profile-cold-inline-threshold=9999999 -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=INLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll : 'RUN: at line 14'; /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -passes=sample-profile -sample-profile-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/Inputs/inline-cold.prof -sample-profile-inline-size -sample-profile-cold-inline-threshold=-500 -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=NOTINLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -- Exit Code: 2 Command Output (stderr): -- /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'llvm::sampleprof::FunctionSamples' #0 0x5a730f8 in shouldInlineCandidate /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53 #1 0x5a730f8 in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::tryInlineCandidate((anonymous namespace)::InlineCandidate&, llvm::SmallVector<llvm::CallBase*, 8u>*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1178:21 #2 0x5a6cda6 in inlineHotFunctions /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1105:13 #3 0x5a6cda6 in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::emitAnnotations(llvm::Function&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1633:16 #4 0x5a5fcbe in runOnFunction /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:2008:12 #5 0x5a5fcbe in (anonymous namespace)::SampleProfileLoader::runOnModule(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>*, llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo*, llvm::CallGraph*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1922:15 #6 0x5a5de55 in llvm::SampleProfileLoaderPass::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:2038:21 #7 0x6552a01 in llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::SampleProfileLoaderPass, llvm::PreservedAnalyses, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module> >::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:88:17 #8 0x57f807c in llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module> >::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:526:21 #9 0x37c8522 in llvm::runPassPipeline(llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module&, llvm::TargetMachine*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfoImpl*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::StringRef, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::StringRef>, llvm::opt_tool::OutputKind, llvm::opt_tool::VerifierKind, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/NewPMDriver.cpp:489:7 #10 0x37e7c11 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp:830:12 #11 0x7fcd534a209a in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2409a) #12 0x379e519 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/opt+0x379e519) SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp:1309:53 in FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty. FileCheck command line: /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck -check-prefix=INLINE /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll -- ******************** Testing: 0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90.. ******************** Failed Tests (2): LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/early-inline.ll LLVM :: Transforms/SampleProfile/inline-cold.ll
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2021
This patch re-introduces the fix in the commit llvm@66b0cebf7f736 by @yrnkrn > In DwarfEHPrepare, after all passes are run, RewindFunction may be a dangling > > pointer to a dead function. To make sure it's valid, doFinalization nullptrs > RewindFunction just like the constructor and so it will be found on next run. > > llvm-svn: 217737 It seems that the fix was not migrated to `DwarfEHPrepareLegacyPass`. This patch also updates `llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll` to include `-run-twice` to exercise the cleanup. Without this patch `llvm-lit -v llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll` fails with ``` -- Testing: 1 tests, 1 workers -- FAIL: LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll (1 of 1) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll' FAILED ******************** Script: -- : 'RUN: at line 1'; /home/arakaki/build/llvm-project/main/bin/opt -mtriple=x86_64-linux-gnu -dwarfehprepare -simplifycfg-require-and-preserve-domtree=1 -run-twice < /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll -S | /home/arakaki/build/llvm-project/main/bin/FileCheck /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll -- Exit Code: 2 Command Output (stderr): -- Referencing function in another module! call void @_Unwind_Resume(i8* %ehptr) #1 ; ModuleID = '<stdin>' void (i8*)* @_Unwind_Resume ; ModuleID = '<stdin>' in function simple_cleanup_catch LLVM ERROR: Broken function found, compilation aborted! PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.llvm.org/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: /home/arakaki/build/llvm-project/main/bin/opt -mtriple=x86_64-linux-gnu -dwarfehprepare -simplifycfg-require-and-preserve-domtree=1 -run-twice -S 1. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module '<stdin>'. 2. Running pass 'Module Verifier' on function '@simple_cleanup_catch' #0 0x000056121b570a2c llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:569:0 #1 0x000056121b56eb64 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:97:0 #2 0x000056121b56f28e SignalHandler(int) /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:397:0 #3 0x00007fc7e9b22980 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x12980) #4 0x00007fc7e87d3fb7 raise /build/glibc-S7xCS9/glibc-2.27/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51:0 #5 0x00007fc7e87d5921 abort /build/glibc-S7xCS9/glibc-2.27/stdlib/abort.c:81:0 #6 0x000056121b4e1386 llvm::raw_svector_ostream::raw_svector_ostream(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char>&) /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h:674:0 #7 0x000056121b4e1386 llvm::report_fatal_error(llvm::Twine const&, bool) /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/ErrorHandling.cpp:114:0 #8 0x000056121b4e1528 (/home/arakaki/build/llvm-project/main/bin/opt+0x29e3528) #9 0x000056121adfd03f llvm::raw_ostream::operator<<(llvm::StringRef) /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h:218:0 FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty. FileCheck command line: /home/arakaki/build/llvm-project/main/bin/FileCheck /home/arakaki/repos/watch/llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll -- ******************** ******************** Failed Tests (1): LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/dwarf-eh-prepare.ll Testing Time: 0.22s Failed: 1 ``` Reviewed By: loladiro Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110979
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2021
Script for automatic 'opt' pipeline reduction for when using the new pass-manager (NPM). Based around the '-print-pipeline-passes' option. The reduction algorithm consists of several phases (steps). Step #0: Verify that input fails with the given pipeline and make note of the error code. Step #1: Split pipeline in two starting from front and move forward as long as first pipeline exits normally and the second pipeline fails with the expected error code. Move on to step #2 with the IR from the split point and the pipeline from the second invocation. Step #2: Remove passes from end of the pipeline as long as the pipeline fails with the expected error code. Step #3: Make several sweeps over the remaining pipeline trying to remove one pass at a time. Repeat sweeps until unable to remove any more passes. Usage example: ./utils/reduce_pipeline.py --opt-binary=./build-all-Debug/bin/opt --input=input.ll --output=output.ll --passes=PIPELINE [EXTRA-OPT-ARGS ...] Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110908
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2021
Although THREADLOCAL variables are supported on Darwin they cannot be used very early on during process init (before dyld has set it up). Unfortunately the checked lock is used before dyld has setup TLS leading to an abort call (`_tlv_boostrap()` is never supposed to be called at runtime). To avoid this problem `SANITIZER_CHECK_DEADLOCKS` is now disabled on Darwin platforms. This fixes running TSan tests (an possibly other Sanitizers) when `COMPILER_RT_DEBUG=ON`. For reference the crashing backtrace looks like this: ``` * thread #1, stop reason = signal SIGABRT * frame #0: 0x00000002044da0ae dyld`__abort_with_payload + 10 frame #1: 0x00000002044f01af dyld`abort_with_payload_wrapper_internal + 80 frame #2: 0x00000002044f01e1 dyld`abort_with_payload + 9 frame #3: 0x000000010c989060 dyld_sim`abort_with_payload + 26 frame #4: 0x000000010c94908b dyld_sim`dyld4::halt(char const*) + 375 frame #5: 0x000000010c988f5c dyld_sim`abort + 16 frame #6: 0x000000010c96104f dyld_sim`dyld4::APIs::_tlv_bootstrap() + 9 frame #7: 0x000000010cd8d6d2 libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::CheckedMutex::LockImpl(this=<unavailable>, pc=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_mutex.cpp:218:58 [opt] frame #8: 0x000000010cd8a0f7 libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Mutex::Lock() [inlined] __sanitizer::CheckedMutex::Lock(this=0x000000010d733c90) at sanitizer_mutex.h:124:5 [opt] frame #9: 0x000000010cd8a0ee libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Mutex::Lock(this=0x000000010d733c90) at sanitizer_mutex.h:162:19 [opt] frame #10: 0x000000010cd8a0bf libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock(this=0x000000030c7479a8, mu=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_mutex.h:364:10 [opt] frame #11: 0x000000010cd89819 libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock(this=0x000000030c7479a8, mu=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_mutex.h:363:67 [opt] frame #12: 0x000000010cd8985b libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::LibIgnore::OnLibraryLoaded(this=0x000000010d72f480, name=0x0000000000000000) at sanitizer_libignore.cpp:39:8 [opt] frame #13: 0x000000010cda7aaa libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::InitializeLibIgnore() at tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:219:16 [opt] frame #14: 0x000000010cdce0bb libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::Initialize(thr=0x0000000110141400) at tsan_rtl.cpp:403:3 [opt] frame #15: 0x000000010cda7b8e libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::ScopedInterceptor(__tsan::ThreadState*, char const*, unsigned long) [inlined] __tsan::LazyInitialize(thr=0x0000000110141400) at tsan_rtl.h:665:5 [opt] frame #16: 0x000000010cda7b86 libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::ScopedInterceptor(this=0x000000030c747af8, thr=0x0000000110141400, fname=<unavailable>, pc=4568918787) at tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:247:3 [opt] frame #17: 0x000000010cda7bb9 libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::ScopedInterceptor(this=0x000000030c747af8, thr=<unavailable>, fname=<unavailable>, pc=<unavailable>) at tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:246:59 [opt] frame #18: 0x000000010cdb72b7 libclang_rt.tsan_iossim_dynamic.dylib`::wrap_strlcpy(dst="\xd2", src="0xd1d398d1bb0a007b", size=20) at sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:7386:3 [opt] frame #19: 0x0000000110542b03 libsystem_c.dylib`__guard_setup + 140 frame #20: 0x00000001104f8ab4 libsystem_c.dylib`_libc_initializer + 65 ... ``` rdar://83723445 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111243
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2021
…cxx with compiler implied -lunwind
This does mostly the same as D112126, but for the runtimes cmake files.
Most of that is straightforward, but the interdependency between
libcxx and libunwind is tricky:
Libunwind is built at the same time as libcxx, but libunwind is not
installed yet. LIBCXXABI_USE_LLVM_UNWINDER makes libcxx link directly
against the just-built libunwind, but the compiler implicit -lunwind
isn't found. This patch avoids that by adding --unwindlib=none if
supported, if we are going to link explicitly against a newly built
unwinder anyway.
Since the previous attempt, this no longer uses
llvm_enable_language_nolink (and thus doesn't set
CMAKE_TRY_COMPILE_TARGET_TYPE=STATIC_LIBRARY during the compiler
sanity checks). Setting CMAKE_TRY_COMPILE_TARGET_TYPE=STATIC_LIBRARY
during compiler sanity checks makes cmake not learn about some
aspects of the compiler, which can make further find_library or
find_package fail. This caused OpenMP to not detect libelf and libffi,
disabling some OpenMP target plugins.
Instead, require the caller to set CMAKE_{C,CXX}_COMPILER_WORKS=YES
when building in a configuration with an incomplete toolchain.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113253
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2021
…he parser" This reverts commit b0e8667. ASAN/UBSAN bot is broken with this trace: [ RUN ] FlatAffineConstraintsTest.FindSampleTest llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/Support/MathExtras.h:27:15: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 1229996100002 * 809999700000 cannot be represented in type 'long' #0 0x7f63ace960e4 in mlir::ceilDiv(long, long) llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/Support/MathExtras.h:27:15 #1 0x7f63ace8587e in ceil llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/Analysis/Presburger/Fraction.h:57:42 #2 0x7f63ace8587e in operator* llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:347:42 #3 0x7f63ace8587e in uninitialized_copy<llvm::mapped_iterator<mlir::Fraction *, long (*)(mlir::Fraction), long>, long *> include/c++/v1/__memory/uninitialized_algorithms.h:36:62 #4 0x7f63ace8587e in uninitialized_copy<llvm::mapped_iterator<mlir::Fraction *, long (*)(mlir::Fraction), long>, long *> llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:490:5 #5 0x7f63ace8587e in append<llvm::mapped_iterator<mlir::Fraction *, long (*)(mlir::Fraction), long>, void> llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:662:5 #6 0x7f63ace8587e in SmallVector<llvm::mapped_iterator<mlir::Fraction *, long (*)(mlir::Fraction), long> > llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:1204:11 #7 0x7f63ace8587e in mlir::FlatAffineConstraints::findIntegerSample() const llvm-project/mlir/lib/Analysis/AffineStructures.cpp:1171:27 #8 0x7f63ae95a84d in mlir::checkSample(bool, mlir::FlatAffineConstraints const&, mlir::TestFunction) llvm-project/mlir/unittests/Analysis/AffineStructuresTest.cpp:37:23 #9 0x7f63ae957545 in mlir::FlatAffineConstraintsTest_FindSampleTest_Test::TestBody() llvm-project/mlir/unittests/Analysis/AffineStructuresTest.cpp:222:3
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2022
Segmentation fault in ompt_tsan_dependences function due to an unchecked NULL pointer dereference is as follows: ``` ThreadSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ==140865==ERROR: ThreadSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000050 (pc 0x7f217c2d3652 bp 0x7ffe8cfc7e00 sp 0x7ffe8cfc7d90 T140865) ==140865==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. ==140865==Hint: address points to the zero page. /usr/bin/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 1012a /usr/bin/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 133b5 /usr/bin/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 1371a /usr/bin/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 13a58 #0 ompt_tsan_dependences(ompt_data_t*, ompt_dependence_t const*, int) /ptmp/bhararit/llvm-project/openmp/tools/archer/ompt-tsan.cpp:1004 (libarcher.so+0x15652) #1 __kmpc_doacross_post /ptmp/bhararit/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/kmp_csupport.cpp:4280 (libomp.so+0x74d98) #2 .omp_outlined. for_ordered_01.c:? (for_ordered_01.exe+0x5186cb) #3 __kmp_invoke_microtask /ptmp/bhararit/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/z_Linux_asm.S:1166 (libomp.so+0x14e592) #4 __kmp_invoke_task_func /ptmp/bhararit/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/kmp_runtime.cpp:7556 (libomp.so+0x909ad) #5 __kmp_fork_call /ptmp/bhararit/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/kmp_runtime.cpp:2284 (libomp.so+0x8461a) #6 __kmpc_fork_call /ptmp/bhararit/llvm-project/openmp/runtime/src/kmp_csupport.cpp:308 (libomp.so+0x6db55) #7 main ??:? (for_ordered_01.exe+0x51828f) #8 __libc_start_main ??:? (libc.so.6+0x24349) #9 _start /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.26/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120 (for_ordered_01.exe+0x4214e9) ThreadSanitizer can not provide additional info. SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: SEGV /ptmp/bhararit/llvm-project/openmp/tools/archer/ompt-tsan.cpp:1004 in ompt_tsan_dependences(ompt_data_t*, ompt_dependence_t const*, int) ==140865==ABORTING ``` To reproduce the error, use the following openmp code snippet: ``` /* initialise testMatrixInt Matrix, cols, r and c */ #pragma omp parallel private(r,c) shared(testMatrixInt) { #pragma omp for ordered(2) for (r=1; r < rows; r++) { for (c=1; c < cols; c++) { #pragma omp ordered depend(sink:r-1, c+1) depend(sink:r-1,c-1) testMatrixInt[r][c] = (testMatrixInt[r-1][c] + testMatrixInt[r-1][c-1]) % cols ; #pragma omp ordered depend (source) } } } ``` Compilation: ``` clang -g -stdlib=libc++ -fsanitize=thread -fopenmp -larcher test_case.c ``` It seems like the changes introduced by the commit https://reviews.llvm.org/D114005 causes this particular SEGV while using Archer. Reviewed By: protze.joachim Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115328
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2022
For code below:
{
r7 = addasl(r3,r0,#2)
r8 = addasl(r3,r2,#2)
r5 = memw(r3+r0<<#2)
r6 = memw(r3+r2<<#2)
}
{
p1 = cmp.gtu(r6,r5)
if (p1.new) memw(r8+#0) = r5
if (p1.new) memw(r7+#0) = r6
}
{
r0 = mux(p1,r2,r4)
}
In packetizer, a new packet is created for the cmp instruction since
there arent enough resources in previous packet. Also it is determined
that the cmp stalls by 2 cycles since it depends on the prior load of r5.
In current packetizer implementation, the predicated store is evaluated
for whether it can go in the same packet as compare, and since the compare
stalls, the stall of the predicated store does not matter and it can go in
the same packet as the cmp. However the predicated store will stall for
more cycles because of its dependence on the addasl instruction and to
avoid that stall we can put it in a new packet.
Improve the packetizer to check if an instruction being added to packet
will stall longer than instruction already in packet and if so create a
new packet.
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2022
We experienced some deadlocks when we used multiple threads for logging using `scan-builds` intercept-build tool when we used multiple threads by e.g. logging `make -j16` ``` (gdb) bt #0 0x00007f2bb3aff110 in __lll_lock_wait () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x00007f2bb3af70a3 in pthread_mutex_lock () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 #2 0x00007f2bb3d152e4 in ?? () #3 0x00007ffcc5f0cc80 in ?? () #4 0x00007f2bb3d2bf5b in ?? () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #5 0x00007f2bb3b5da27 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #6 0x00007f2bb3b5dbe0 in exit () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #7 0x00007f2bb3d144ee in ?? () #8 0x746e692f706d742f in ?? () #9 0x692d747065637265 in ?? () #10 0x2f653631326b3034 in ?? () #11 0x646d632e35353532 in ?? () #12 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () ``` I think the gcc's exit call caused the injected `libear.so` to be unloaded by the `ld`, which in turn called the `void on_unload() __attribute__((destructor))`. That tried to acquire an already locked mutex which was left locked in the `bear_report_call()` call, that probably encountered some error and returned early when it forgot to unlock the mutex. All of these are speculation since from the backtrace I could not verify if frames 2 and 3 are in fact corresponding to the `libear.so` module. But I think it's a fairly safe bet. So, hereby I'm releasing the held mutex on *all paths*, even if some failure happens. PS: I would use lock_guards, but it's C. Reviewed-by: NoQ Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118439
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2022
There is a clangd crash at `__memcmp_avx2_movbe`. Short problem description is below.
The method `HeaderIncludes::addExistingInclude` stores `Include` objects by reference at 2 places: `ExistingIncludes` (primary storage) and `IncludesByPriority` (pointer to the object's location at ExistingIncludes). `ExistingIncludes` is a map where value is a `SmallVector`. A new element is inserted by `push_back`. The operation might do resize. As result pointers stored at `IncludesByPriority` might become invalid.
Typical stack trace
```
frame #0: 0x00007f11460dcd94 libc.so.6`__memcmp_avx2_movbe + 308
frame #1: 0x00000000004782b8 clangd`llvm::StringRef::compareMemory(Lhs="
\"t2.h\"", Rhs="", Length=6) at StringRef.h:76:22
frame #2: 0x0000000000701253 clangd`llvm::StringRef::compare(this=0x0000
7f10de7d8610, RHS=(Data = "", Length = 7166742329480737377)) const at String
Ref.h:206:34
* frame #3: 0x00000000007603ab clangd`llvm::operator<(llvm::StringRef, llv
m::StringRef)(LHS=(Data = "\"t2.h\"", Length = 6), RHS=(Data = "", Length =
7166742329480737377)) at StringRef.h:907:23
frame #4: 0x0000000002d0ad9f clangd`clang::tooling::HeaderIncludes::inse
rt(this=0x00007f10de7fb1a0, IncludeName=(Data = "t2.h\"", Length = 4), IsAng
led=false) const at HeaderIncludes.cpp:365:22
frame #5: 0x00000000012ebfdd clangd`clang::clangd::IncludeInserter::inse
rt(this=0x00007f10de7fb148, VerbatimHeader=(Data = "\"t2.h\"", Length = 6))
const at Headers.cpp:262:70
```
A unit test test for the crash was created (`HeaderIncludesTest.RepeatedIncludes`). The proposed solution is to use std::list instead of llvm::SmallVector
Test Plan
```
./tools/clang/unittests/Tooling/ToolingTests --gtest_filter=HeaderIncludesTest.RepeatedIncludes
```
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118755
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2022
This patch fixes a data race in IOHandlerProcessSTDIO. The race is
happens between the main thread and the event handling thread. The main
thread is running the IOHandler (IOHandlerProcessSTDIO::Run()) when an
event comes in that makes us pop the process IO handler which involves
cancelling the IOHandler (IOHandlerProcessSTDIO::Cancel). The latter
calls SetIsDone(true) which modifies m_is_done. At the same time, we
have the main thread reading the variable through GetIsDone().
This patch avoids the race by using a mutex to synchronize the two
threads. On the event thread, in IOHandlerProcessSTDIO ::Cancel method,
we obtain the lock before changing the value of m_is_done. On the main
thread, in IOHandlerProcessSTDIO::Run(), we obtain the lock before
reading the value of m_is_done. Additionally, we delay calling SetIsDone
until after the loop exists, to avoid a potential race between the two
writes.
Write of size 1 at 0x00010b66bb68 by thread T7 (mutexes: write M2862, write M718324145051843688):
#0 lldb_private::IOHandler::SetIsDone(bool) IOHandler.h:90 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x971d84)
#1 IOHandlerProcessSTDIO::Cancel() Process.cpp:4382 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x5ddfec)
#2 lldb_private::Debugger::PopIOHandler(std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::IOHandler> const&) Debugger.cpp:1156 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x3cb2a8)
#3 lldb_private::Debugger::RemoveIOHandler(std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::IOHandler> const&) Debugger.cpp:1063 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x3cbd2c)
#4 lldb_private::Process::PopProcessIOHandler() Process.cpp:4487 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x5c583c)
#5 lldb_private::Debugger::HandleProcessEvent(std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Event> const&) Debugger.cpp:1549 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x3ceabc)
#6 lldb_private::Debugger::DefaultEventHandler() Debugger.cpp:1622 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x3cf2c0)
#7 std::__1::__function::__func<lldb_private::Debugger::StartEventHandlerThread()::$_2, std::__1::allocator<lldb_private::Debugger::StartEventHandlerThread()::$_2>, void* ()>::operator()() function.h:352 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x3d1bd8)
#8 lldb_private::HostNativeThreadBase::ThreadCreateTrampoline(void*) HostNativeThreadBase.cpp:62 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x4c71ac)
#9 lldb_private::HostThreadMacOSX::ThreadCreateTrampoline(void*) HostThreadMacOSX.mm:18 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x29ef544)
Previous read of size 1 at 0x00010b66bb68 by main thread:
#0 lldb_private::IOHandler::GetIsDone() IOHandler.h:92 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x971db8)
#1 IOHandlerProcessSTDIO::Run() Process.cpp:4339 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x5ddc7c)
#2 lldb_private::Debugger::RunIOHandlers() Debugger.cpp:982 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x3cb48c)
#3 lldb_private::CommandInterpreter::RunCommandInterpreter(lldb_private::CommandInterpreterRunOptions&) CommandInterpreter.cpp:3298 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x506478)
#4 lldb::SBDebugger::RunCommandInterpreter(bool, bool) SBDebugger.cpp:1166 (liblldb.15.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x53604)
#5 Driver::MainLoop() Driver.cpp:634 (lldb:arm64+0x100006294)
#6 main Driver.cpp:853 (lldb:arm64+0x100007344)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120762
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2022
…view Since the threads/frame view is taking only a small part on the right side of the screen, only a part of the function name of each frame is visible. It seems rather wasteful to spell out 'frame' there when it's obvious that it is a frame, it's better to use the space for more of the function name. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122998
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2022
Detected on many lld tests with -fsanitize-memory-use-after-dtor. Also https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast after D122869 will report a lot of them. Threads may outlive static variables. Even if ~__thread_specific_ptr() does nothing, lifetime of members ends with ~ and accessing the value is UB https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.life#1 ``` ==9214==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x557e1cec4539 in __libcpp_tls_set ../include/c++/v1/__threading_support:428:12 #1 0x557e1cec4539 in set_pointer ../include/c++/v1/thread:196:5 #2 0x557e1cec4539 in void* std::__msan::__thread_proxy< std::__msan::tuple<...>, llvm::parallel::detail::(anonymous namespace)::ThreadPoolExecutor::ThreadPoolExecutor(llvm::ThreadPoolStrategy)::'lambda'()::operator()() const::'lambda'()> >(void*) ../include/c++/v1/thread:285:27 Memory was marked as uninitialized #0 0x557e10a0759d in __sanitizer_dtor_callback compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:940:5 #1 0x557e1d8c478d in std::__msan::__thread_specific_ptr<std::__msan::__thread_struct>::~__thread_specific_ptr() libcxx/include/thread:188:1 #2 0x557e10a07dc0 in MSanCxaAtExitWrapper(void*) compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:1151:3 ``` The test needs D123979 or -fsanitize-memory-param-retval enabled by default. Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122864
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2022
…ified offset and its parents or children with spcified depth." This reverts commit a3b7cb0. symbol-offset.test fails under MSAN: [ 1] ; RUN: llvm-pdbutil yaml2pdb %p/Inputs/symbol-offset.yaml --pdb=%t.pdb [FAIL] llvm-pdbutil yaml2pdb <REDACTED>/llvm/test/tools/llvm-pdbutil/Inputs/symbol-offset.yaml --pdb=<REDACTED>/tmp/symbol-offset.test/symbol-offset.test.tmp.pdb ==9283==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x55f975e5eb91 in __libcpp_tls_set <REDACTED>/include/c++/v1/__threading_support:428:12 #1 0x55f975e5eb91 in set_pointer <REDACTED>/include/c++/v1/thread:196:5 #2 0x55f975e5eb91 in void* std::__msan::__thread_proxy<std::__msan::tuple<std::__msan::unique_ptr<std::__msan::__thread_struct, std::__msan::default_delete<std::__msan::__thread_struct> >, llvm::parallel::detail::(anonymous namespace)::ThreadPoolExecutor::ThreadPoolExecutor(llvm::ThreadPoolStrategy)::'lambda'()::operator()() const::'lambda'()> >(void*) <REDACTED>/include/c++/v1/thread:285:27 #3 0x7f74a1e55b54 in start_thread (<REDACTED>/libpthread.so.0+0xbb54) (BuildId: 64752de50ebd1a108f4b3f8d0d7e1a13) #4 0x7f74a1dc9f7e in clone (<REDACTED>/libc.so.6+0x13cf7e) (BuildId: 7cfed7708e5ab7fcb286b373de21ee76)
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2022
This reverts commit c274b6e. The x86_64 debian bot got a failure with this patch, https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot#builders/68/builds/33078 where SymbolFile/DWARF/x86/DW_TAG_variable-DW_AT_decl_file-DW_AT_abstract_origin-crosscu1.s is crashing here - #2 0x0000000000425a9f SignalHandler(int) Signals.cpp:0:0 #3 0x00007f57160e9140 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x14140) #4 0x00007f570d911e43 lldb_private::SourceManager::GetFile(lldb_private::FileSpec const&) crtstuff.c:0:0 #5 0x00007f570d914270 lldb_private::SourceManager::DisplaySourceLinesWithLineNumbers(lldb_private::FileSpec const&, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int, char const*, lldb_private::Stream*, lldb_private::SymbolContextList const*) crtstuff.c:0:0 #6 0x00007f570da662c8 lldb_private::StackFrame::GetStatus(lldb_private::Stream&, bool, bool, bool, char const*) crtstuff.c:0:0 I don't get a failure here my mac, I'll review this method more closely tomorrow.
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 9, 2022
…ned form
The DWARF spec says:
Any debugging information entry representing the declaration of an object,
module, subprogram or type may have DW_AT_decl_file, DW_AT_decl_line and
DW_AT_decl_column attributes, each of whose value is an unsigned integer
^^^^^^^^
constant.
If however, a producer happens to emit DW_AT_decl_file /
DW_AT_decl_line using a signed integer form, llvm-dwarfdump crashes,
like so:
(... snip ...)
0x000000b4: DW_TAG_structure_type
DW_AT_name ("test_struct")
DW_AT_byte_size (136)
DW_AT_decl_file (llvm-dwarfdump: (... snip ...)/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h:197: T& llvm::optional_detail::OptionalStorage<T, true>::getValue() &
[with T = long unsigned int]: Assertion `hasVal' failed.
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace.
Stack dump:
0. Program arguments: /opt/rocm/llvm/bin/llvm-dwarfdump ./testsuite/outputs/gdb.rocm/lane-pc-vega20/lane-pc-vega20-kernel.so
#0 0x000055cc8e78315f PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) Signals.cpp:0:0
#1 0x000055cc8e780d3d SignalHandler(int) Signals.cpp:0:0
#2 0x00007f8f2cae8420 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x14420)
#3 0x00007f8f2c58d00b raise /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51:1
#4 0x00007f8f2c56c859 abort /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/stdlib/abort.c:81:7
#5 0x00007f8f2c56c729 get_sysdep_segment_value /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/intl/loadmsgcat.c:509:8
#6 0x00007f8f2c56c729 _nl_load_domain /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/intl/loadmsgcat.c:970:34
#7 0x00007f8f2c57dfd6 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x33fd6)
#8 0x000055cc8e58ceb9 llvm::DWARFDie::dump(llvm::raw_ostream&, unsigned int, llvm::DIDumpOptions) const (/opt/rocm/llvm/bin/llvm-dwarfdump+0x2e0eb9)
#9 0x000055cc8e58bec3 llvm::DWARFDie::dump(llvm::raw_ostream&, unsigned int, llvm::DIDumpOptions) const (/opt/rocm/llvm/bin/llvm-dwarfdump+0x2dfec3)
#10 0x000055cc8e5b28a3 llvm::DWARFCompileUnit::dump(llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::DIDumpOptions) (.part.21) DWARFCompileUnit.cpp:0:0
Likewise with DW_AT_call_file / DW_AT_call_line.
The problem is that the code in llvm/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFDie.cpp
dumping these attributes assumes that
FormValue.getAsUnsignedConstant() returns an armed optional. If in
debug mode, we get an assertion line the above. If in release mode,
and asserts are compiled out, then we proceed as if the optional had a
value, running into undefined behavior, printing whatever random
value.
Fix this by checking whether the optional returned by
FormValue.getAsUnsignedConstant() has a value, like done in other
places.
In addition, DWARFVerifier.cpp is validating DW_AT_call_file /
DW_AT_decl_file, but not AT_call_line / DW_AT_decl_line. This commit
fixes that too.
The llvm-dwarfdump/X86/verify_file_encoding.yaml testcase is extended
to cover these cases. Current llvm-dwarfdump crashes running the
newly-extended test.
"make check-llvm-tools-llvm-dwarfdump" shows no regressions, on x86-64
GNU/Linux.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129392
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2022
This diff adjusts AddedComplexity of BIC to bump its position in the list of patterns to make LLVM pick it instead of MVN + AND. MVN + AND requires 2 cycles, so does e.g. MOV + BIC, but the latter outperforms the former if the instructions producing the operands of BIC can be issued in parallel. One may consider the following example: ldur x15, [x0, #2] # 4 cycles mvn x10, x15 # 1 cycle (depends on ldur) and x9, x10, #0x8080808080808080 vs. ldur x15, [x0, #2] # 4 cycles mov x9, #0x8080808080808080 # 1 cycle (can be executed in parallel with ldur) bic x9, x9, x15. # 1 cycle Test plan: ninja check-all Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133345
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2022
Found by msan -fsanitize-memory-use-after-dtor.
==8259==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0x55dbec54d2b8 in dtorRecord(clang::interp::Block*, char*, clang::interp::Descriptor*) clang/lib/AST/Interp/Descriptor.cpp:150:22
#1 0x55dbec54bfcf in dtorArrayDesc(clang::interp::Block*, char*, clang::interp::Descriptor*) clang/lib/AST/Interp/Descriptor.cpp:97:7
#2 0x55dbec508578 in invokeDtor clang/lib/AST/Interp/InterpBlock.h:79:7
#3 0x55dbec508578 in clang::interp::Program::~Program() clang/lib/AST/Interp/Program.h:55:19
#4 0x55dbec50657a in operator() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:55:5
#5 0x55dbec50657a in std::__msan::unique_ptr<clang::interp::Program, std::__msan::default_delete<clang::interp::Program>>::~unique_ptr() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:261:7
#6 0x55dbec5035a1 in clang::interp::Context::~Context() clang/lib/AST/Interp/Context.cpp:27:22
#7 0x55dbebec1daa in operator() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:55:5
#8 0x55dbebec1daa in std::__msan::unique_ptr<clang::interp::Context, std::__msan::default_delete<clang::interp::Context>>::~unique_ptr() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:261:7
#9 0x55dbebe285f9 in clang::ASTContext::~ASTContext() clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:1038:40
#10 0x55dbe941ff13 in llvm::RefCountedBase<clang::ASTContext>::Release() const llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:101:7
#11 0x55dbe94353ef in release llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:159:38
#12 0x55dbe94353ef in release llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:224:7
#13 0x55dbe94353ef in ~IntrusiveRefCntPtr llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:191:27
#14 0x55dbe94353ef in clang::CompilerInstance::setASTContext(clang::ASTContext*) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:178:3
#15 0x55dbe95ad0ad in clang::FrontendAction::EndSourceFile() clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:1100:8
#16 0x55dbe9445fcf in clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:1047:11
#17 0x55dbe6b3afef in clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:266:25
#18 0x55dbe6b13288 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:250:15
#19 0x55dbe6b0095f in ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&) clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:319:12
#20 0x55dbe6aff41c in clang_main(int, char**) clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:395:12
#21 0x7f9be07fa632 in __libc_start_main
#22 0x55dbe6a702e9 in _start
Member fields were destroyed
#0 0x55dbe6a7da5d in __sanitizer_dtor_callback_fields compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:949:5
#1 0x55dbec5094ac in ~SmallVectorImpl llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:479:7
#2 0x55dbec5094ac in ~SmallVectorImpl llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:612:3
#3 0x55dbec5094ac in llvm::SmallVector<clang::interp::Record::Base, 8u>::~SmallVector() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:1207:3
#4 0x55dbec508e79 in clang::interp::Record::~Record() clang/lib/AST/Interp/Record.h:24:7
#5 0x55dbec508612 in clang::interp::Program::~Program() clang/lib/AST/Interp/Program.h:49:26
#6 0x55dbec50657a in operator() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:55:5
#7 0x55dbec50657a in std::__msan::unique_ptr<clang::interp::Program, std::__msan::default_delete<clang::interp::Program>>::~unique_ptr() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:261:7
#8 0x55dbec5035a1 in clang::interp::Context::~Context() clang/lib/AST/Interp/Context.cpp:27:22
#9 0x55dbebec1daa in operator() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:55:5
#10 0x55dbebec1daa in std::__msan::unique_ptr<clang::interp::Context, std::__msan::default_delete<clang::interp::Context>>::~unique_ptr() third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/toolchain/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:261:7
#11 0x55dbebe285f9 in clang::ASTContext::~ASTContext() clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:1038:40
#12 0x55dbe941ff13 in llvm::RefCountedBase<clang::ASTContext>::Release() const llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:101:7
#13 0x55dbe94353ef in release llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:159:38
#14 0x55dbe94353ef in release llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:224:7
#15 0x55dbe94353ef in ~IntrusiveRefCntPtr llvm/include/llvm/ADT/IntrusiveRefCntPtr.h:191:27
#16 0x55dbe94353ef in clang::CompilerInstance::setASTContext(clang::ASTContext*) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:178:3
#17 0x55dbe95ad0ad in clang::FrontendAction::EndSourceFile() clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:1100:8
#18 0x55dbe9445fcf in clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:1047:11
#19 0x55dbe6b3afef in clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:266:25
#20 0x55dbe6b13288 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:250:15
#21 0x55dbe6b0095f in ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&) clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:319:12
#22 0x55dbe6aff41c in clang_main(int, char**) clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:395:12
#23 0x7f9be07fa632 in __libc_start_main
#24 0x55dbe6a702e9 in _start
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2022
Casting a pointer to a suitably large integral type by reinterpret-cast should result in the same value as by using the `__builtin_bit_cast()`. The compiler exploits this: https://godbolt.org/z/zMP3sG683 However, the analyzer does not bind the same symbolic value to these expressions, resulting in weird situations, such as failing equality checks and even results in crashes: https://godbolt.org/z/oeMP7cj8q Previously, in the `RegionStoreManager::getBinding()` even if `T` was non-null, we replaced it with `TVR->getValueType()` in case the `MR` was `TypedValueRegion`. It doesn't make much sense to auto-detect the type if the type is already given. By not doing the auto-detection, we would just do the right thing and perform the load by that type. This means that we will cast the value to that type. So, in this patch, I'm proposing to do auto-detection only if the type was null. Here is a snippet of code, annotated by the previous and new dump values. `LocAsInteger` should wrap the `SymRegion`, since we want to load the address as if it was an integer. In none of the following cases should type auto-detection be triggered, hence we should eventually reach an `evalCast()` to lazily cast the loaded value into that type. ```lang=C++ void LValueToRValueBitCast_dumps(void *p, char (*array)[8]) { clang_analyzer_dump(p); // remained: &SymRegion{reg_$0<void * p>} clang_analyzer_dump(array); // remained: {{&SymRegion{reg_$1<char (*)[8] array>} clang_analyzer_dump((unsigned long)p); // remained: {{&SymRegion{reg_$0<void * p>} [as 64 bit integer]}} clang_analyzer_dump(__builtin_bit_cast(unsigned long, p)); <--------- change #1 // previously: {{&SymRegion{reg_$0<void * p>}}} // now: {{&SymRegion{reg_$0<void * p>} [as 64 bit integer]}} clang_analyzer_dump((unsigned long)array); // remained: {{&SymRegion{reg_$1<char (*)[8] array>} [as 64 bit integer]}} clang_analyzer_dump(__builtin_bit_cast(unsigned long, array)); <--------- change #2 // previously: {{&SymRegion{reg_$1<char (*)[8] array>}}} // now: {{&SymRegion{reg_$1<char (*)[8] array>} [as 64 bit integer]}} } ``` Reviewed By: xazax.hun Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136603
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2022
The Assignment Tracking debug-info feature is outlined in this RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/ rfc-assignment-tracking-a-better-way-of-specifying-variable-locations-in-ir Add initial revision of assignment tracking analysis pass --------------------------------------------------------- This patch squashes five individually reviewed patches into one: #1 https://reviews.llvm.org/D136320 #2 https://reviews.llvm.org/D136321 #3 https://reviews.llvm.org/D136325 #4 https://reviews.llvm.org/D136331 #5 https://reviews.llvm.org/D136335 Patch #1 introduces 2 new files: AssignmentTrackingAnalysis.h and .cpp. The two subsequent patches modify those files only. Patch #4 plumbs the analysis into SelectionDAG, and patch #5 is a collection of tests for the analysis as a whole. The analysis was broken up into smaller chunks for review purposes but for the most part the tests were written using the whole analysis. It would be possible to break up the tests for patches #1 through #3 for the purpose of landing the patches seperately. However, most them would require an update for each patch. In addition, patch #4 - which connects the analysis to SelectionDAG - is required by all of the tests. If there is build-bot trouble, we might try a different landing sequence. Analysis problem and goal ------------------------- Variables values can be stored in memory, or available as SSA values, or both. Using the Assignment Tracking metadata, it's not possible to determine a variable location just by looking at a debug intrinsic in isolation. Instructions without any metadata can change the location of a variable. The meaning of dbg.assign intrinsics changes depending on whether there are linked instructions, and where they are relative to those instructions. So we need to analyse the IR and convert the embedded information into a form that SelectionDAG can consume to produce debug variable locations in MIR. The solution is a dataflow analysis which, aiming to maximise the memory location coverage for variables, outputs a mapping of instruction positions to variable location definitions. API usage --------- The analysis is named `AssignmentTrackingAnalysis`. It is added as a required pass for SelectionDAGISel when assignment tracking is enabled. The results of the analysis are exposed via `getResults` using the returned `const FunctionVarLocs *`'s const methods: const VarLocInfo *single_locs_begin() const; const VarLocInfo *single_locs_end() const; const VarLocInfo *locs_begin(const Instruction *Before) const; const VarLocInfo *locs_end(const Instruction *Before) const; void print(raw_ostream &OS, const Function &Fn) const; Debug intrinsics can be ignored after running the analysis. Instead, variable location definitions that occur between an instruction `Inst` and its predecessor (or block start) can be found by looping over the range: locs_begin(Inst), locs_end(Inst) Similarly, variables with a memory location that is valid for their lifetime can be iterated over using the range: single_locs_begin(), single_locs_end() Further detail -------------- For an explanation of the dataflow implementation and the integration with SelectionDAG, please see the reviews linked at the top of this commit message. Reviewed By: jmorse
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 21, 2023
When building/testing ASan inside the GCC tree on Solaris while using GNU `ld` instead of Solaris `ld`, a large number of tests SEGVs on both sparc and x86 like this: Thread 2 received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 1 (LWP 1)] 0xfe014cfc in __sanitizer::atomic_load<__sanitizer::atomic_uintptr_t> (a=0xfc602a58, mo=__sanitizer::memory_order_acquire) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_atomic_clang_x86.h:46 46 v = a->val_dont_use; 1: x/i $pc => 0xfe014cfc <_ZN11__sanitizer11atomic_loadINS_16atomic_uintptr_tEEENT_4TypeEPVKS2_NS_12memory_orderE+62>: mov (%eax),%eax (gdb) bt #0 0xfe014cfc in __sanitizer::atomic_load<__sanitizer::atomic_uintptr_t> (a=0xfc602a58, mo=__sanitizer::memory_order_acquire) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_atomic_clang_x86.h:46 #1 0xfe0bd1d7 in __sanitizer::DTLS_NextBlock (cur=0xfc602a58) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_tls_get_addr.cpp:53 #2 0xfe0bd319 in __sanitizer::DTLS_Find (id=1) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_tls_get_addr.cpp:77 #3 0xfe0bd466 in __sanitizer::DTLS_on_tls_get_addr (arg_void=0xfeffd068, res=0xfe602a18, static_tls_begin=0, static_tls_end=0) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_tls_get_addr.cpp:116 #4 0xfe063f81 in __interceptor___tls_get_addr (arg=0xfeffd068) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:5501 #5 0xfe0a3054 in __sanitizer::CollectStaticTlsBlocks (info=0xfeffd108, size=40, data=0xfeffd16c) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:366 #6 0xfe6ba9fa in dl_iterate_phdr () from /usr/lib/ld.so.1 #7 0xfe0a3132 in __sanitizer::GetStaticTlsBoundary (addr=0xfe608020, size=0xfeffd244, align=0xfeffd1b0) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:382 #8 0xfe0a33f7 in __sanitizer::GetTls (addr=0xfe608020, size=0xfeffd244) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:482 #9 0xfe0a34b1 in __sanitizer::GetThreadStackAndTls (main=true, stk_addr=0xfe608010, stk_size=0xfeffd240, tls_addr=0xfe608020, tls_size=0xfeffd244) at sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp:565 The address being accessed is unmapped. However, even when the tests `PASS` with Solaris `ld`, `ASAN_OPTIONS=verbosity=2` shows ==6582==__tls_get_addr: Can't guess glibc version Given that that the code is stricly `glibc`-specific according to `sanitizer_tls_get_addr.h`, there seems little point in using the interceptor on non-`glibc` targets. That's what this patch does. Tested on `i386-pc-solaris2.11` and `sparc-sun-solaris2.11` inside the GCC tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141385
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2023
Change https://reviews.llvm.org/D140059 exposed the following crash in Z3Solver, where bit widths were not checked consistently with that change. This change makes the check consistent, and fixes the crash. ``` clang: <root>/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APSInt.h:99: int64_t llvm::APSInt::getExtValue() const: Assertion `isRepresentableByInt64() && "Too many bits for int64_t"' failed. ... Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: clang -cc1 -internal-isystem <root>/lib/clang/16/include -nostdsysteminc -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,unix.Malloc,debug.ExprInspection -analyzer-config crosscheck-with-z3=true -verify reproducer.c #0 0x00000000045b3476 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) <root>/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:567:22 #1 0x00000000045b3862 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) <root>/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:641:1 #2 0x00000000045b14a5 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() <root>/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:104:20 #3 0x00000000045b2eb4 SignalHandler(int) <root>/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:412:1 ... #9 0x0000000004be2eb3 llvm::APSInt::getExtValue() const <root>/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APSInt.h:99:5 <root>/llvm/lib/Support/Z3Solver.cpp:740:53 clang::ASTContext&, clang::ento::SymExpr const*, llvm::APSInt const&, llvm::APSInt const&, bool) <root>/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/SMTConv.h:552:61 ``` Reviewed By: steakhal Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142627
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2023
…ak ordering
`std::sort` requires a comparison operator that obides by strict weak
ordering. `operator<=` on pointer does not and leads to undefined
behaviour. Specifically, when we grow the `scratch_type_systems` vector
slightly larger (and thus take `std::sort` down a slightly different
codepath), we segfault. This happened while working on a patch that
would in fact grow this vector. In such a case ASAN reports:
```
$ ./bin/lldb ./lldb-test-build.noindex/lang/cpp/complete-type-check/TestCppIsTypeComplete.test_builtin_types/a.out -o "script -- lldb.target.FindFirstType(\"void\")"
(lldb) script -- lldb.target.FindFirstType("void")
=================================================================
==59975==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: container-overflow on address 0x000108f6b510 at pc 0x000280177b4c bp 0x00016b7d7430 sp 0x00016b7d7428
READ of size 8 at 0x000108f6b510 thread T0
#0 0x280177b48 in std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>::shared_ptr[abi:v15006](std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&)+0xb4 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x177b48)
(BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#1 0x280dcc008 in void std::__1::__introsort<std::__1::_ClassicAlgPolicy, lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)::$_3&, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*>(std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*, std::__1::shared_
ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*, lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)::$_3&, std::__1::iterator_traits<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>*>::difference_type)+0x1050 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblld
b.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xdcc008) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#2 0x280d88788 in lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)+0x5a4 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xd88788) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#3 0x28021f0b4 in lldb::SBTarget::FindFirstType(char const*)+0x624 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x21f0b4) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#4 0x2804e9590 in _wrap_SBTarget_FindFirstType(_object*, _object*)+0x26c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x4e9590) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#5 0x1062d3ad4 in cfunction_call+0x5c (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.11/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0xcfad4) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00)
<--- snipped --->
0x000108f6b510 is located 400 bytes inside of 512-byte region [0x000108f6b380,0x000108f6b580)
allocated by thread T0 here:
#0 0x105209414 in wrap__Znwm+0x74 (/Applications/Xcode2.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/lib/clang/14.0.3/lib/darwin/libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:arm64e+0x51414) (BuildId: 0a44828ceb64337bbfff60b22cd838f0320000
00200000000100000000000b00)
#1 0x280dca3b4 in std::__1::__split_buffer<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>&>::__split_buffer(unsigned long, unsigned long, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_pt
r<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>&)+0x11c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xdca3b4) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#2 0x280dc978c in void std::__1::vector<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>>::__push_back_slow_path<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&>(std::__1::s
hared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&)+0x13c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xdc978c) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#3 0x280d88dec in std::__1::vector<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem>>>::push_back[abi:v15006](std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::TypeSystem> const&)+0x80 (/Users/mic
haelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xd88dec) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#4 0x280d8857c in lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystems(bool)+0x398 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0xd8857c) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#5 0x28021f0b4 in lldb::SBTarget::FindFirstType(char const*)+0x624 (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x21f0b4) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#6 0x2804e9590 in _wrap_SBTarget_FindFirstType(_object*, _object*)+0x26c (/Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/liblldb.17.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x4e9590) (BuildId: ea963d2c0d47354fb647f5c5f32b76d932000000200000000100000000000d00)
#7 0x1062d3ad4 in cfunction_call+0x5c (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.11/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0xcfad4) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00)
#8 0x10627fff0 in _PyObject_MakeTpCall+0x7c (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.11/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0x7bff0) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00)
#9 0x106378a98 in _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault+0xbcf8 (/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.11/3.11.1/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/Python:arm64+0x174a98) (BuildId: c9efc4bbb1943f9a9b7cc4e91fce477732000000200000000100000000000d00)
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142709
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2023
… -analyzer-config
I am working on another patch that changes StringMap's hash function,
which changes the iteration order here, and breaks some tests,
specifically:
clang/test/Analysis/NSString.m
clang/test/Analysis/shallow-mode.m
with errors like:
generated arguments do not match in round-trip
generated arguments #1 in round-trip: <...> "-analyzer-config" "ipa=inlining" "-analyzer-config" "max-nodes=75000" <...>
generated arguments #2 in round-trip: <...> "-analyzer-config" "max-nodes=75000" "-analyzer-config" "ipa=inlining" <...>
To avoid this, sort the options by key, instead of using the default map
iteration order.
Reviewed By: jansvoboda11, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142861
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2023
For example, if you have a chain of inlined funtions like this:
1 #include <stdlib.h>
2 int g1 = 4, g2 = 6;
3
4 static inline void bar(int q) {
5 if (q > 5)
6 abort();
7 }
8
9 static inline void foo(int q) {
10 bar(q);
11 }
12
13 int main() {
14 foo(g1);
15 foo(g2);
16 return 0;
17 }
with optimizations you could end up with a single abort call for the two
inlined instances of foo(). When merging the locations for those inlined
instances you would previously end up with a 0:0 location in main().
Leaving out that inlined chain from the location for the abort call
could make troubleshooting difficult in some cases.
This patch changes DILocation::getMergedLocation() to try to handle such
cases. The function is rewritten to first find a common starting point
for the two locations (same subprogram and inlined-at location), and
then in reverse traverses the inlined-at chain looking for matches in
each subprogram. For each subprogram, the merge function will find the
nearest common scope for the two locations, and matching line and
column (or set them to 0 if not matching).
In the example above, you will for the abort call get a location in
bar() at 6:5, inlined in foo() at 10:3, inlined in main() at 0:0 (since
the two inlined functions are on different lines, but in the same
scope).
I have not seen anything in the DWARF standard that would disallow
inlining a non-zero location at 0:0 in the inlined-at function, and both
LLDB and GDB seem to accept these locations (with D142552 needed for
LLDB to handle cases where the file, line and column number are all 0).
One incompatibility with GDB is that it seems to ignore 0-line locations
in some cases, but I am not aware of any specific issue that this patch
produces related to that.
With x86-64 LLDB (trunk) you previously got:
frame #0: 0x00007ffff7a44930 libc.so.6`abort
frame #1: 0x00005555555546ec a.out`main at merge.c:0
and will now get:
frame #0: 0x[...] libc.so.6`abort
frame #1: 0x[...] a.out`main [inlined] bar(q=<unavailable>) at merge.c:6:5
frame #2: 0x[...] a.out`main [inlined] foo(q=<unavailable>) at merge.c:10:3
frame #3: 0x[...] a.out`main at merge.c:0
and with x86-64 GDB (11.1) you will get:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff7a44930 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x00005555555546ec in bar (q=<optimized out>) at merge.c:6
#2 foo (q=<optimized out>) at merge.c:10
#3 0x00005555555546ec in main ()
Reviewed By: aprantl, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142556
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2023
This change prevents rare deadlocks observed for specific macOS/iOS GUI
applications which issue many `dlopen()` calls from multiple different
threads at startup and where TSan finds and reports a race during
startup. Providing a reliable test for this has been deemed infeasible.
Although I've only observed this deadlock on Apple platforms,
conceptually the cause is not confined to Apple code so the fix lives in
platform-independent code.
Deadlock scenario:
```
Thread 2 | Thread 4
ReportRace() |
Lock internal TSan mutexes |
&ctx->slot_mtx |
| dlopen() interceptor
| OnLibraryLoaded()
| MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules()
| calls dyld API, which takes internal lock
| lock() interceptor
| TSan tries to take internal mutexes again
| &ctx->slot_mtx
call into symbolizer |
MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules()
calls dyld API, which hangs on trying to take lock
```
Resulting in:
* Thread 2 has internal TSan mutex, blocked on dyld lock
* Thread 4 has dyld lock, blocked on internal TSan mutex
The fix prevents this situation by not intercepting any of the calls
originating from `MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules()`.
Stack traces for deadlock between ReportRace() and dlopen() interceptor:
```
thread #2, queue = 'com.apple.root.default-qos'
frame #0: libsystem_kernel.dylib
frame #1: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::wrap_os_unfair_lock_lock_with_options(lock=<unavailable>, options=<unavailable>) at tsan_interceptors_mac.cpp:306:3
frame #2: dyld`dyld4::RuntimeLocks::withLoadersReadLock(this=0x000000016f21b1e0, work=0x00000001814523c0) block_pointer) at DyldRuntimeState.cpp:227:28
frame #3: dyld`dyld4::APIs::_dyld_get_image_header(this=0x0000000101012a20, imageIndex=614) at DyldAPIs.cpp:240:11
frame #4: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::CurrentImageHeader(this=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:391:35
frame #5: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::Next(this=0x000000016f2a2800, segment=0x000000016f2a2738) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:397:51
frame #6: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules(this=0x000000016f2a2800, modules=0x00000001011000a0) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:460:10
frame #7: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::ListOfModules::init(this=0x00000001011000a0) at sanitizer_mac.cpp:610:18
frame #8: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Symbolizer::FindModuleForAddress(unsigned long) [inlined] __sanitizer::Symbolizer::RefreshModules(this=0x0000000101100078) at sanitizer_symbolizer_libcdep.cpp:185:12
frame #9: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Symbolizer::FindModuleForAddress(this=0x0000000101100078, address=6465454512) at sanitizer_symbolizer_libcdep.cpp:204:5
frame #10: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Symbolizer::SymbolizePC(this=0x0000000101100078, addr=6465454512) at sanitizer_symbolizer_libcdep.cpp:88:15
frame #11: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::SymbolizeCode(addr=6465454512) at tsan_symbolize.cpp:106:35
frame #12: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::SymbolizeStack(trace=StackTrace @ 0x0000600002d66d00) at tsan_rtl_report.cpp:112:28
frame #13: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedReportBase::AddMemoryAccess(this=0x000000016f2a2a90, addr=4381057136, external_tag=<unavailable>, s=<unavailable>, tid=<unavailable>, stack=<unavailable>, mset=0x00000001012fc310) at tsan_rtl_report.cpp:190:16
frame #14: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ReportRace(thr=0x00000001012fc000, shadow_mem=0x000008020a4340e0, cur=<unavailable>, old=<unavailable>, typ0=1) at tsan_rtl_report.cpp:795:9
frame #15: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::DoReportRace(thr=0x00000001012fc000, shadow_mem=0x000008020a4340e0, cur=Shadow @ x22, old=Shadow @ 0x0000600002d6b4f0, typ=1) at tsan_rtl_access.cpp:166:3
frame #16: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::__tsan_read8(void *) at tsan_rtl_access.cpp:220:5
frame #17: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::__tsan_read8(void *) [inlined] __tsan::MemoryAccess(thr=0x00000001012fc000, pc=<unavailable>, addr=<unavailable>, size=8, typ=1) at tsan_rtl_access.cpp:442:3
frame #18: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::__tsan_read8(addr=<unavailable>) at tsan_interface.inc:34:3
<call into TSan from from instrumented code>
thread #4, queue = 'com.apple.dock.fullscreen'
frame #0: libsystem_kernel.dylib
frame #1: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::FutexWait(p=<unavailable>, cmp=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_mac.cpp:540:3
frame #2: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Semaphore::Wait(this=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_mutex.cpp:35:7
frame #3: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::Mutex::Lock(this=0x0000000102992a80) at sanitizer_mutex.h:196:18
frame #4: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() [inlined] __sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock(this=<unavailable>, mu=0x0000000102992a80) at sanitizer_mutex.h:383:10
frame #5: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() [inlined] __sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock(this=<unavailable>, mu=0x0000000102992a80) at sanitizer_mutex.h:382:77
frame #6: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() at tsan_rtl.h:708:10
frame #7: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() [inlined] __tsan::TryTraceFunc(thr=0x000000010f084000, pc=0) at tsan_rtl.h:751:7
frame #8: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor() [inlined] __tsan::FuncExit(thr=0x000000010f084000) at tsan_rtl.h:798:7
frame #9: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor(this=0x000000016f3ba280) at tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:300:5
frame #10: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__tsan::ScopedInterceptor::~ScopedInterceptor(this=<unavailable>) at tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:293:41
frame #11: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::wrap_os_unfair_lock_lock_with_options(lock=0x000000016f21b1e8, options=OS_UNFAIR_LOCK_NONE) at tsan_interceptors_mac.cpp:310:1
frame #12: dyld`dyld4::RuntimeLocks::withLoadersReadLock(this=0x000000016f21b1e0, work=0x00000001814525d4) block_pointer) at DyldRuntimeState.cpp:227:28
frame #13: dyld`dyld4::APIs::_dyld_get_image_vmaddr_slide(this=0x0000000101012a20, imageIndex=412) at DyldAPIs.cpp:273:11
frame #14: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::Next(__sanitizer::MemoryMappedSegment*) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:286:17
frame #15: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::Next(this=0x000000016f3ba560, segment=0x000000016f3ba498) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:432:15
frame #16: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::MemoryMappingLayout::DumpListOfModules(this=0x000000016f3ba560, modules=0x000000016f3ba618) at sanitizer_procmaps_mac.cpp:460:10
frame #17: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::ListOfModules::init(this=0x000000016f3ba618) at sanitizer_mac.cpp:610:18
frame #18: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`__sanitizer::LibIgnore::OnLibraryLoaded(this=0x0000000101f3aa40, name="<some library>") at sanitizer_libignore.cpp:54:11
frame #19: libclang_rt.tsan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::wrap_dlopen(filename="<some library>", flag=<unavailable>) at sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:6466:3
<library code>
```
rdar://106766395
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146593
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2023
…callback
The `TypeSystemMap::m_mutex` guards against concurrent modifications
of members of `TypeSystemMap`. In particular, `m_map`.
`TypeSystemMap::ForEach` iterates through the entire `m_map` calling
a user-specified callback for each entry. This is all done while
`m_mutex` is locked. However, there's nothing that guarantees that
the callback itself won't call back into `TypeSystemMap` APIs on the
same thread. This lead to double-locking `m_mutex`, which is undefined
behaviour. We've seen this cause a deadlock in the swift plugin with
following backtrace:
```
int main() {
std::unique_ptr<int> up = std::make_unique<int>(5);
volatile int val = *up;
return val;
}
clang++ -std=c++2a -g -O1 main.cpp
./bin/lldb -o “br se -p return” -o run -o “v *up” -o “expr *up” -b
```
```
frame #4: std::lock_guard<std::mutex>::lock_guard
frame #5: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage <<<< Lock #2
frame #6: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage
frame #7: lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystemForLanguage
...
frame #26: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadLibraryUsingPaths
frame #27: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadModule
frame #30: swift::ModuleDecl::collectLinkLibraries
frame #31: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadModule
frame #34: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::GetCompileUnitImportsImpl
frame #35: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::PerformCompileUnitImports
frame #36: lldb_private::TypeSystemSwiftTypeRefForExpressions::GetSwiftASTContext
frame #37: lldb_private::TypeSystemSwiftTypeRefForExpressions::GetPersistentExpressionState
frame #38: lldb_private::Target::GetPersistentSymbol
frame #41: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::ForEach <<<< Lock #1
frame #42: lldb_private::Target::GetPersistentSymbol
frame #43: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::FindInUserDefinedSymbols
frame #44: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::FindSymbol
frame #45: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::GetSymbolAddressAndPresence
frame #46: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol
frame #47: non-virtual thunk to lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol
frame #48: llvm::LinkingSymbolResolver::findSymbol
frame #49: llvm::LegacyJITSymbolResolver::lookup
frame #50: llvm::RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveExternalSymbols
frame #51: llvm::RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveRelocations
frame #52: llvm::MCJIT::finalizeLoadedModules
frame #53: llvm::MCJIT::finalizeObject
frame #54: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::ReportAllocations
frame #55: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::GetRunnableInfo
frame #56: lldb_private::ClangExpressionParser::PrepareForExecution
frame #57: lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::TryParse
frame #58: lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::Parse
```
Our solution is to simply iterate over a local copy of `m_map`.
**Testing**
* Confirmed on manual reproducer (would reproduce 100% of the time
before the patch)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149949
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2023
…est unittest
Need to finalize the DIBuilder to avoid leak sanitizer errors
like this:
Direct leak of 48 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x55c99ea1761d in operator new(unsigned long)
#1 0x55c9a518ae49 in operator new
#2 0x55c9a518ae49 in llvm::MDTuple::getImpl(...)
#3 0x55c9a4f1b1ec in getTemporary
#4 0x55c9a4f1b1ec in llvm::DIBuilder::createFunction(...)
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2023
The motivation for this change is a workload generated by the XLA compiler targeting nvidia GPUs. This kernel has a few hundred i8 loads and stores. Merging is critical for performance. The current LSV doesn't merge these well because it only considers instructions within a block of 64 loads+stores. This limit is necessary to contain the O(n^2) behavior of the pass. I'm hesitant to increase the limit, because this pass is already one of the slowest parts of compiling an XLA program. So we rewrite basically the whole thing to use a new algorithm. Before, we compared every load/store to every other to see if they're consecutive. The insight (from tra@) is that this is redundant. If we know the offset from PtrA to PtrB, then we don't need to compare PtrC to both of them in order to tell whether C may be adjacent to A or B. So that's what we do. When scanning a basic block, we maintain a list of chains, where we know the offset from every element in the chain to the first element in the chain. Each instruction gets compared only to the leaders of all the chains. In the worst case, this is still O(n^2), because all chains might be of length 1. To prevent compile time blowup, we only consider the 64 most recently used chains. Thus we do no more comparisons than before, but we have the potential to make much longer chains. This rewrite affects many tests. The changes to tests fall into two categories. 1. The old code had what appears to be a bug when deciding whether a misaligned vectorized load is fast. Suppose TTI reports that load <i32 x 4> align 4 has relative speed 1, and suppose that load i32 align 4 has relative speed 32. The intent of the code seems to be that we prefer the scalar load, because it's faster. But the old code would choose the vectorized load. accessIsMisaligned would set RelativeSpeed to 0 for the scalar load (and not even call into TTI to get the relative speed), because the scalar load is aligned. After this patch, we will prefer the scalar load if it's faster. 2. This patch changes the logic for how we vectorize. Usually this results in vectorizing more. Explanation of changes to tests: - AMDGPU/adjust-alloca-alignment.ll: #1 - AMDGPU/flat_atomic.ll: #2, we vectorize more. - AMDGPU/int_sideeffect.ll: #2, there are two possible locations for the call to @foo, and the pass is brittle to this. Before, we'd vectorize in case 1 and not case 2. Now we vectorize in case 2 and not case 1. So we just move the call. - AMDGPU/adjust-alloca-alignment.ll: #2, we vectorize more - AMDGPU/insertion-point.ll: #2 we vectorize more - AMDGPU/merge-stores-private.ll: #1 (undoes changes from git rev 86f9117, which appear to have hit the bug from #1) - AMDGPU/multiple_tails.ll: #1 - AMDGPU/vect-ptr-ptr-size-mismatch.ll: Fix alignment (I think related to #1 above). - AMDGPU CodeGen: I have difficulty commenting on these changes, but many of them look like #2, we vectorize more. - NVPTX/4x2xhalf.ll: Fix alignment (I think related to #1 above). - NVPTX/vectorize_i8.ll: We don't generate <3 x i8> vectors on NVPTX because they're not legal (and eventually get split) - X86/correct-order.ll: #2, we vectorize more, probably because of changes to the chain-splitting logic. - X86/subchain-interleaved.ll: #2, we vectorize more - X86/vector-scalar.ll: #2, we can now vectorize scalar float + <1 x float> - X86/vectorize-i8-nested-add-inseltpoison.ll: Deleted the nuw test because it was nonsensical. It was doing `add nuw %v0, -1`, but this is equivalent to `add nuw %v0, 0xffff'ffff`, which is equivalent to asserting that %v0 == 0. - X86/vectorize-i8-nested-add.ll: Same as nested-add-inseltpoison.ll Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149893
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 5, 2023
Running this on Amazon Ubuntu the final backtrace is: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace * thread #1, name = 'a.out', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000aaaaaaaa07d0 a.out`func_c at main.c:10:3 frame #1: 0x0000aaaaaaaa07c4 a.out`func_b at main.c:14:3 frame #2: 0x0000aaaaaaaa07b4 a.out`func_a at main.c:18:3 frame #3: 0x0000aaaaaaaa07a4 a.out`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) at main.c:22:3 frame #4: 0x0000fffff7b373fc libc.so.6`___lldb_unnamed_symbol2962 + 108 frame #5: 0x0000fffff7b374cc libc.so.6`__libc_start_main + 152 frame #6: 0x0000aaaaaaaa06b0 a.out`_start + 48 ``` This causes the test to fail because of the extra ___lldb_unnamed_symbol2962 frame (an inlined function?). To fix this, strictly check all the frames in main.c then for the rest just check we find __libc_start_main and _start in that order regardless of other frames in between. Reviewed By: omjavaid Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154204
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2023
…tput The crash happens in clang::driver::tools::SplitDebugName when Output is InputInfo::Nothing. It doesn't happen with standalone clang driver because output is created in Driver::BuildJobsForActionNoCache. Example backtrace: ``` * thread #1, name = 'clangd', stop reason = hit program assert * frame #0: 0x00007ffff5c4eacf libc.so.6`raise + 271 frame #1: 0x00007ffff5c21ea5 libc.so.6`abort + 295 frame #2: 0x00007ffff5c21d79 libc.so.6`__assert_fail_base.cold.0 + 15 frame #3: 0x00007ffff5c47426 libc.so.6`__assert_fail + 70 frame #4: 0x000055555dc0923c clangd`clang::driver::InputInfo::getFilename(this=0x00007fffffff9398) const at InputInfo.h:84:5 frame #5: 0x000055555dcd0d8d clangd`clang::driver::tools::SplitDebugName(JA=0x000055555f6c6a50, Args=0x000055555f6d0b80, Input=0x00007fffffff9678, Output=0x00007fffffff9398) at CommonArgs.cpp:1275:40 frame #6: 0x000055555dc955a5 clangd`clang::driver::tools::Clang::ConstructJob(this=0x000055555f6c69d0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, JA=0x000055555f6c6a50, Output=0x00007fffffff9398, Inputs=0x00007fffffff9668, Args=0x000055555f6d0b80, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000) const at Clang.cpp:5690:33 frame #7: 0x000055555dbf6b54 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobsForActionNoCache(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, A=0x000055555f6c6a50, TC=0x000055555f6c4be0, BoundArch=(Data = 0x0000000000000000, Length = 0), AtTopLevel=true, MultipleArchs=false, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000, CachedResults=size=1, TargetDeviceOffloadKind=OFK_None) const at Driver.cpp:5618:10 frame #8: 0x000055555dbf4ef0 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobsForAction(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, A=0x000055555f6c6a50, TC=0x000055555f6c4be0, BoundArch=(Data = 0x0000000000000000, Length = 0), AtTopLevel=true, MultipleArchs=false, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000, CachedResults=size=1, TargetDeviceOffloadKind=OFK_None) const at Driver.cpp:5306:26 frame #9: 0x000055555dbeb590 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobs(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0) const at Driver.cpp:4844:5 frame #10: 0x000055555dbe6b0f clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildCompilation(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, ArgList=ArrayRef<const char *> @ 0x00007fffffffb268) at Driver.cpp:1496:3 frame #11: 0x000055555b0cc0d9 clangd`clang::createInvocation(ArgList=ArrayRef<const char *> @ 0x00007fffffffbb38, Opts=CreateInvocationOptions @ 0x00007fffffffbb90) at CreateInvocationFromCommandLine.cpp:53:52 frame #12: 0x000055555b378e7b clangd`clang::clangd::buildCompilerInvocation(Inputs=0x00007fffffffca58, D=0x00007fffffffc158, CC1Args=size=0) at Compiler.cpp:116:44 frame #13: 0x000055555895a6c8 clangd`clang::clangd::(anonymous namespace)::Checker::buildInvocation(this=0x00007fffffffc760, TFS=0x00007fffffffe570, Contents= Has Value=false ) at Check.cpp:212:9 frame #14: 0x0000555558959cec clangd`clang::clangd::check(File=(Data = "build/test.cpp", Length = 64), TFS=0x00007fffffffe570, Opts=0x00007fffffffe600) at Check.cpp:486:34 frame #15: 0x000055555892164a clangd`main(argc=4, argv=0x00007fffffffecd8) at ClangdMain.cpp:993:12 frame #16: 0x00007ffff5c3ad85 libc.so.6`__libc_start_main + 229 frame #17: 0x00005555585bbe9e clangd`_start + 46 ``` Test Plan: ninja ClangDriverTests && tools/clang/unittests/Driver/ClangDriverTests Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154602
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2023
ParmVarDecl of BlockDecl is unnecessarily dumped twice. Remove this duplication as other FunctionDecls. Fixes llvm#64005 (#2) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155985
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2023
TSan reports the following data race:
Write of size 4 at 0x000109e0b160 by thread T2 (mutexes: write M0, write M1):
#0 NativeFile::Close() File.cpp:329
#1 ConnectionFileDescriptor::Disconnect(lldb_private::Status*) ConnectionFileDescriptorPosix.cpp:232
#2 Communication::Disconnect(lldb_private::Status*) Communication.cpp:61
#3 process_gdb_remote::ProcessGDBRemote::DidExit() ProcessGDBRemote.cpp:1164
#4 Process::SetExitStatus(int, char const*) Process.cpp:1097
#5 process_gdb_remote::ProcessGDBRemote::MonitorDebugserverProcess(...) ProcessGDBRemote.cpp:3387
Previous read of size 4 at 0x000109e0b160 by main thread (mutexes: write M2):
#0 NativeFile::IsValid() const File.h:393
#1 ConnectionFileDescriptor::IsConnected() const ConnectionFileDescriptorPosix.cpp:121
#2 Communication::IsConnected() const Communication.cpp:79
#3 process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunication::WaitForPacketNoLock(...) GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp:256
#4 process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunication::WaitForPacketNoLock(...l) GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp:244
#5 process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteClientBase::SendPacketAndWaitForResponseNoLock(llvm::StringRef, StringExtractorGDBRemote&) GDBRemoteClientBase.cpp:246
The problem is that in WaitForPacketNoLock's run loop, it checks that
the connection is still connected. This races with the
ConnectionFileDescriptor disconnecting. Most (but not all) access to the
IOObject in ConnectionFileDescriptorPosix is already gated by the mutex.
This patch just protects IsConnected in the same way.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157347
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2023
TSan reports the following race:
Write of size 8 at 0x000107707ee8 by main thread:
#0 lldb_private::ThreadedCommunication::StartReadThread(...) ThreadedCommunication.cpp:175
#1 lldb_private::Process::SetSTDIOFileDescriptor(...) Process.cpp:4533
#2 lldb_private::Platform::DebugProcess(...) Platform.cpp:1121
#3 lldb_private::PlatformDarwin::DebugProcess(...) PlatformDarwin.cpp:711
#4 lldb_private::Target::Launch(...) Target.cpp:3235
#5 CommandObjectProcessLaunch::DoExecute(...) CommandObjectProcess.cpp:256
#6 lldb_private::CommandObjectParsed::Execute(...) CommandObject.cpp:751
#7 lldb_private::CommandInterpreter::HandleCommand(...) CommandInterpreter.cpp:2054
Previous read of size 8 at 0x000107707ee8 by thread T5:
#0 lldb_private::HostThread::IsJoinable(...) const HostThread.cpp:30
#1 lldb_private::ThreadedCommunication::StopReadThread(...) ThreadedCommunication.cpp:192
#2 lldb_private::Process::ShouldBroadcastEvent(...) Process.cpp:3420
#3 lldb_private::Process::HandlePrivateEvent(...) Process.cpp:3728
#4 lldb_private::Process::RunPrivateStateThread(...) Process.cpp:3914
#5 std::__1::__function::__func<lldb_private::Process::StartPrivateStateThread(...) function.h:356
#6 lldb_private::HostNativeThreadBase::ThreadCreateTrampoline(...) HostNativeThreadBase.cpp:62
#7 lldb_private::HostThreadMacOSX::ThreadCreateTrampoline(...) HostThreadMacOSX.mm:18
The problem is the lack of synchronization between starting and stopping
the read thread. This patch fixes that by protecting those operations
with a mutex.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157361
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2023
TSan reports the following data race:
Write of size 4 at 0x000109e0b160 by thread T2 (...):
#0 lldb_private::NativeFile::Close() File.cpp:329
#1 lldb_private::ConnectionFileDescriptor::Disconnect(...) ConnectionFileDescriptorPosix.cpp:232
#2 lldb_private::Communication::Disconnect(...) Communication.cpp:61
#3 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::ProcessGDBRemote::DidExit() ProcessGDBRemote.cpp:1164
#4 lldb_private::Process::SetExitStatus(...) Process.cpp:1097
#5 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::ProcessGDBRemote::MonitorDebugserverProcess(...) ProcessGDBRemote.cpp:3387
Previous read of size 4 at 0x000109e0b160 by main thread (...):
#0 lldb_private::NativeFile::IsValid() const File.h:393
#1 lldb_private::ConnectionFileDescriptor::IsConnected() const ConnectionFileDescriptorPosix.cpp:121
#2 lldb_private::Communication::IsConnected() const Communication.cpp:79
#3 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunication::WaitForPacketNoLock(...) GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp:256
#4 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunication::WaitForPacketNoLock(...) GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp:244
#5 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteClientBase::SendPacketAndWaitForResponseNoLock(...) GDBRemoteClientBase.cpp:246
I originally tried fixing the problem at the ConnectionFileDescriptor
level, but that operates on an IOObject which can have different thread
safety guarantees depending on its implementation.
For this particular issue, the problem is specific to NativeFile.
NativeFile can hold a file descriptor and/or a file stream. Throughout
its implementation, it checks if the descriptor or stream is valid and
do some operation on it if it is. While that works in a single threaded
environment, nothing prevents another thread from modifying the
descriptor or stream between the IsValid check and when it's actually
being used.
This patch prevents such issues by returning a ValueGuard RAII object.
As long as the object is in scope, the value is guaranteed by a lock.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157347
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2023
Thread sanitizer reports the following data race:
```
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=43201)
Write of size 4 at 0x00010520c474 by thread T1 (mutexes: write M0, write M1):
#0 lldb_private::PipePosix::CloseWriteFileDescriptor() PipePosix.cpp:242 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x414700) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00)
#1 lldb_private::PipePosix::Close() PipePosix.cpp:217 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x4144e8) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00)
#2 lldb_private::ConnectionFileDescriptor::Disconnect(lldb_private::Status*) ConnectionFileDescriptorPosix.cpp:239 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x40a620) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00)
#3 lldb_private::Communication::Disconnect(lldb_private::Status*) Communication.cpp:61 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x2a9318) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00)
#4 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::ProcessGDBRemote::DidExit() ProcessGDBRemote.cpp:1167 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x8ed984) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00)
Previous read of size 4 at 0x00010520c474 by main thread (mutexes: write M2, write M3):
#0 lldb_private::PipePosix::CanWrite() const PipePosix.cpp:229 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x4145e4) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00)
#1 lldb_private::ConnectionFileDescriptor::Disconnect(lldb_private::Status*) ConnectionFileDescriptorPosix.cpp:212 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x40a4a8) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00)
#2 lldb_private::Communication::Disconnect(lldb_private::Status*) Communication.cpp:61 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x2a9318) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00)
#3 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunication::WaitForPacketNoLock(StringExtractorGDBRemote&, lldb_private::Timeout<std::__1::ratio<1l, 1000000l>>, bool) GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp:373 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x8b9c48) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00)
#4 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunication::WaitForPacketNoLock(StringExtractorGDBRemote&, lldb_private::Timeout<std::__1::ratio<1l, 1000000l>>, bool) GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp:243 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x8b9904) (BuildId: 2983976beb2637b5943bff32fd12eb8932000000200000000100000000000e00)
```
Fix this by adding a mutex to PipePosix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157654
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2023
ThreadSanitizer reports the following issue:
```
Write of size 8 at 0x00010a70abb0 by thread T3 (mutexes: write M0):
#0 lldb_private::ThreadList::Update(lldb_private::ThreadList&) ThreadList.cpp:741 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x5dedf4) (BuildId: 9bced2aafa373580ae9d750d9cf79a8f32000000200000000100000000000e00)
#1 lldb_private::Process::UpdateThreadListIfNeeded() Process.cpp:1212 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x53bbec) (BuildId: 9bced2aafa373580ae9d750d9cf79a8f32000000200000000100000000000e00)
Previous read of size 8 at 0x00010a70abb0 by main thread (mutexes: write M1):
#0 lldb_private::ThreadList::GetMutex() const ThreadList.cpp:785 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x5df138) (BuildId: 9bced2aafa373580ae9d750d9cf79a8f32000000200000000100000000000e00)
#1 lldb_private::ThreadList::DidResume() ThreadList.cpp:656 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x5de5c0) (BuildId: 9bced2aafa373580ae9d750d9cf79a8f32000000200000000100000000000e00)
#2 lldb_private::Process::PrivateResume() Process.cpp:3130 (liblldb.18.0.0git.dylib:arm64+0x53cd7c) (BuildId: 9bced2aafa373580ae9d750d9cf79a8f32000000200000000100000000000e00)
```
Fix this by only using the mutex in ThreadList and removing the one in
process entirely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158034
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2023
Replace `BPFMIPeepholeTruncElim` by adding an overload for `TargetLowering::isZExtFree()` aware that zero extension is free for `ISD::LOAD`. Short description ================= The `BPFMIPeepholeTruncElim` handles two patterns: Pattern #1: %1 = LDB %0, ... %1 = LDB %0, ... %2 = AND_ri %1, 0xff -> %2 = MOV_ri %1 <-- (!) Pattern #2: bb.1: bb.1: %a = LDB %0, ... %a = LDB %0, ... br %bb3 br %bb3 bb.2: bb.2: %b = LDB %0, ... -> %b = LDB %0, ... br %bb3 br %bb3 bb.3: bb.3: %1 = PHI %a, %b %1 = PHI %a, %b %2 = AND_ri %1, 0xff %2 = MOV_ri %1 <-- (!) Plus variations: - AND_ri_32 instead of AND_ri - SLL/SLR instead of AND_ri - LDH, LDW, LDB32, LDH32, LDW32 Both patterns could be handled by built-in transformations at instruction selection phase if suitable `isZExtFree()` implementation is provided. The idea is borrowed from `ARMTargetLowering::isZExtFree`. When evaluating on BPF kernel selftests and remove_truncate_*.ll LLVM test cases this revisions performs slightly better than BPFMIPeepholeTruncElim, see "Impact" section below for details. Commit also adds a few test cases to make sure that patterns in question are handled. Long description ================ Why this works: Pattern #1 -------------------------- Consider the following example: define i1 @foo(ptr %p) { entry: %a = load i8, ptr %p, align 1 %cond = icmp eq i8 %a, 0 ret i1 %cond } Log for `llc -mcpu=v2 -mtriple=bpfel -debug-only=isel` command: ... Type-legalized selection DAG: %bb.0 'foo:entry' SelectionDAG has 13 nodes: t0: ch,glue = EntryToken t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %0 t16: i64,ch = load<(load (s8) from %ir.p), anyext from i8> t0, t2, undef:i64 t19: i64 = and t16, Constant:i64<255> t17: i64 = setcc t19, Constant:i64<0>, seteq:ch t11: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 $r0, t17 t12: ch = BPFISD::RET_GLUE t11, Register:i64 $r0, t11:1 ... Replacing.1 t19: i64 = and t16, Constant:i64<255> With: t16: i64,ch = load<(load (s8) from %ir.p), anyext from i8> t0, t2, undef:i64 and 0 other values ... Optimized type-legalized selection DAG: %bb.0 'foo:entry' SelectionDAG has 11 nodes: t0: ch,glue = EntryToken t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %0 t20: i64,ch = load<(load (s8) from %ir.p), zext from i8> t0, t2, undef:i64 t17: i64 = setcc t20, Constant:i64<0>, seteq:ch t11: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 $r0, t17 t12: ch = BPFISD::RET_GLUE t11, Register:i64 $r0, t11:1 ... Note: - Optimized type-legalized selection DAG: - `t19 = and t16, 255` had been replaced by `t16` (load). - Patterns like `(and (load ... i8), 255)` are replaced by `load` in `DAGCombiner::BackwardsPropagateMask` called from `DAGCombiner::visitAND`. - Similarly patterns like `(shl (srl ..., 56), 56)` are replaced by `(and ..., 255)` in `DAGCombiner::visitSRL` (this function is huge, look for `TLI.shouldFoldConstantShiftPairToMask()` call). Why this works: Pattern #2 -------------------------- Consider the following example: define i1 @foo(ptr %p) { entry: %a = load i8, ptr %p, align 1 br label %next next: %cond = icmp eq i8 %a, 0 ret i1 %cond } Consider log for `llc -mcpu=v2 -mtriple=bpfel -debug-only=isel` command. Log for first basic block: Initial selection DAG: %bb.0 'foo:entry' SelectionDAG has 9 nodes: t0: ch,glue = EntryToken t3: i64 = Constant<0> t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %1 t5: i8,ch = load<(load (s8) from %ir.p)> t0, t2, undef:i64 t6: i64 = zero_extend t5 t8: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 %0, t6 ... Replacing.1 t6: i64 = zero_extend t5 With: t9: i64,ch = load<(load (s8) from %ir.p), zext from i8> t0, t2, undef:i64 and 0 other values ... Optimized lowered selection DAG: %bb.0 'foo:entry' SelectionDAG has 7 nodes: t0: ch,glue = EntryToken t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %1 t9: i64,ch = load<(load (s8) from %ir.p), zext from i8> t0, t2, undef:i64 t8: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 %0, t9 Note: - Initial selection DAG: - `%a = load ...` is lowered as `t6 = (zero_extend (load ...))` w/o special `isZExtFree()` overload added by this commit it is instead lowered as `t6 = (any_extend (load ...))`. - The decision to generate `zero_extend` or `any_extend` is done in `RegsForValue::getCopyToRegs` called from `SelectionDAGBuilder::CopyValueToVirtualRegister`: - if `isZExtFree()` for load returns true `zero_extend` is used; - `any_extend` is used otherwise. - Optimized lowered selection DAG: - `t6 = (any_extend (load ...))` is replaced by `t9 = load ..., zext from i8` This is done by `DagCombiner.cpp:tryToFoldExtOfLoad()` called from `DAGCombiner::visitZERO_EXTEND`. Log for second basic block: Initial selection DAG: %bb.1 'foo:next' SelectionDAG has 13 nodes: t0: ch,glue = EntryToken t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %0 t4: i64 = AssertZext t2, ValueType:ch:i8 t5: i8 = truncate t4 t8: i1 = setcc t5, Constant:i8<0>, seteq:ch t9: i64 = any_extend t8 t11: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 $r0, t9 t12: ch = BPFISD::RET_GLUE t11, Register:i64 $r0, t11:1 ... Replacing.2 t18: i64 = and t4, Constant:i64<255> With: t4: i64 = AssertZext t2, ValueType:ch:i8 ... Type-legalized selection DAG: %bb.1 'foo:next' SelectionDAG has 13 nodes: t0: ch,glue = EntryToken t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %0 t4: i64 = AssertZext t2, ValueType:ch:i8 t18: i64 = and t4, Constant:i64<255> t16: i64 = setcc t18, Constant:i64<0>, seteq:ch t11: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 $r0, t16 t12: ch = BPFISD::RET_GLUE t11, Register:i64 $r0, t11:1 ... Optimized type-legalized selection DAG: %bb.1 'foo:next' SelectionDAG has 11 nodes: t0: ch,glue = EntryToken t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %0 t4: i64 = AssertZext t2, ValueType:ch:i8 t16: i64 = setcc t4, Constant:i64<0>, seteq:ch t11: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 $r0, t16 t12: ch = BPFISD::RET_GLUE t11, Register:i64 $r0, t11:1 ... Note: - Initial selection DAG: - `t0` is an input value for this basic block, it corresponds load instruction (`t9`) from the first basic block. - It is accessed within basic block via `t4` (AssertZext (CopyFromReg t0, ...)). - The `AssertZext` is generated by RegsForValue::getCopyFromRegs called from SelectionDAGBuilder::getCopyFromRegs, it is generated only when `LiveOutInfo` with known number of leading zeros is present for `t0`. - Known register bits in `LiveOutInfo` are computed by `SelectionDAG::computeKnownBits` called from `SelectionDAGISel::ComputeLiveOutVRegInfo`. - `computeKnownBits()` generates leading zeros information for `(load ..., zext from ...)` but *does not* generate leading zeros information for `(load ..., anyext from ...)`. This is why `isZExtFree()` added in this commit is important. - Type-legalized selection DAG: - `t5 = truncate t4` is replaced by `t18 = and t4, 255` - Optimized type-legalized selection DAG: - `t18 = and t4, 255` is replaced by `t4`, this is done by `DAGCombiner::SimplifyDemandedBits` called from `DAGCombiner::visitAND`, which simplifies patterns like `(and (assertzext ...))` Impact ------ This change covers all remove_truncate_*.ll test cases: - for -mcpu=v4 there are no changes in the generated code; - for -mcpu=v2 code generated for remove_truncate_7 and remove_truncate_8 improved slightly, for other tests it is unchanged. For remove_truncate_7: Before this revision After this revision -------------------- ------------------- r1 <<= 0x20 r1 <<= 0x20 r1 >>= 0x20 r1 >>= 0x20 if r1 == 0x0 goto +0x2 <LBB0_2> if r1 == 0x0 goto +0x2 <LBB0_2> r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0x0) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0x0) goto +0x1 <LBB0_3> goto +0x1 <LBB0_3> <LBB0_2>: <LBB0_2>: r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0x4) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0x4) <LBB0_3>: <LBB0_3>: r0 = r1 exit exit For remove_truncate_8: Before this revision After this revision -------------------- ------------------- r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0x0) r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0x0) r3 = r2 r3 = r2 r3 <<= 0x20 r3 <<= 0x20 r4 = r3 r3 s>>= 0x20 r4 s>>= 0x20 if r4 s> 0x2 goto +0x5 <LBB0_3> if r3 s> 0x2 goto +0x4 <LBB0_3> r4 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0x4) r3 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0x4) r3 >>= 0x20 if r3 >= r4 goto +0x2 <LBB0_3> if r2 >= r3 goto +0x2 <LBB0_3> r2 += 0x2 r2 += 0x2 *(u32 *)(r1 + 0x0) = r2 *(u32 *)(r1 + 0x0) = r2 <LBB0_3>: <LBB0_3>: r0 = 0x3 r0 = 0x3 exit exit For kernel BPF selftests statistics is as follows: (-mcpu=v4): - For -mcpu=v4: 9 out of 655 object files have differences, in all cases total number of instructions marginally decreased (-27 instructions). - For -mcpu=v2: 9 out of 655 object files have differences: - For 19 object files number of instruction decreased (-129 instruction in total): some redundant `rX &= 0xffff` and register to register assignments removed; - For 2 object files number of instructions increased +2 instructions in each file. Both -mcpu=v2 instruction increases could be reduced to the same example: define void @foo(ptr %p) { entry: %a = load i32, ptr %p, align 4 %b = sext i32 %a to i64 %c = icmp ult i64 1, %b br i1 %c, label %next, label %end next: call void inttoptr (i64 62 to ptr)(i32 %a) br label %end end: ret void } Note that this example uses value loaded to `%a` both as a sign extended (`%b`) and as zero extended (`%a` passed as parameter). Here is the difference in final assembly code: Before this revision After this revision -------------------- ------------------- r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0) r1 <<= 32 r1 <<= 32 r1 s>>= 32 r1 s>>= 32 if r1 < 2 goto <LBB0_2> if r1 < 2 goto <LBB0_2> r1 <<= 32 r1 >>= 32 call 62 call 62 <LBB0_2>: <LBB0_2>: exit exit Before this commit `%a` is passed to call as a sign extended value, after this commit `%a` is passed to call as a zero extended value, both are correct as 32-bit sub-register is the same. The difference comes from `DAGCombiner` operation on the initial DAG: Initial selection DAG before this commit: t5: i32,ch = load<(load (s32) from %ir.p)> t0, t2, undef:i64 t6: i64 = any_extend t5 <--------------------- (1) t8: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 %0, t6 t9: i64 = sign_extend t5 t12: i1 = setcc Constant:i64<1>, t9, setult:ch Initial selection DAG after this commit: t5: i32,ch = load<(load (s32) from %ir.p)> t0, t2, undef:i64 t6: i64 = zero_extend t5 <--------------------- (2) t8: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 %0, t6 t9: i64 = sign_extend t5 t12: i1 = setcc Constant:i64<1>, t9, setult:ch The node `t9` is processed before node `t6` and `load` instruction is combined to load with sign extension: Replacing.1 t9: i64 = sign_extend t5 With: t30: i64,ch = load<(load (s32) from %ir.p), sext from i32> t0, t2, undef:i64 and 0 other values Replacing.1 t5: i32,ch = load<(load (s32) from %ir.p)> t0, t2, undef:i64 With: t31: i32 = truncate t30 and 1 other values This is done by `DAGCombiner.cpp:tryToFoldExtOfLoad` called from `DAGCombiner::visitSIGN_EXTEND`. Note that `t5` is used by `t6` which is `any_extend` in (1) and `zero_extend` in (2). `tryToFoldExtOfLoad()` rewrites such uses of `t5` differently: - `any_extend` is simply removed - `zero_extend` is replaced by `and t30, 0xffffffff`, which is later converted to a pair of shifts. This pair of shifts survives till the end of translation. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157870
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 28, 2023
This reverts commit 0e63f1a. clang-format started to crash with contents like: a.h: ``` ``` $ clang-format a.h ``` PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: ../llvm/build/bin/clang-format a.h #0 0x0000560b689fe177 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:723:13 #1 0x0000560b689fbfbe llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:106:18 #2 0x0000560b689feaca SignalHandler(int) /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:413:1 #3 0x00007f030405a540 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3c540) #4 0x0000560b68a9a980 is /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/include/clang/Lex/Token.h:98:44 #5 0x0000560b68a9a980 is /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h:562:51 #6 0x0000560b68a9a980 startsSequenceInternal<clang::tok::TokenKind, clang::tok::TokenKind> /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h:831:9 #7 0x0000560b68a9a980 startsSequence<clang::tok::TokenKind, clang::tok::TokenKind> /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h:600:12 #8 0x0000560b68a9a980 getFunctionName /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:3131:17 #9 0x0000560b68a9a980 clang::format::TokenAnnotator::annotate(clang::format::AnnotatedLine&) /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:3191:17 Segmentation fault ```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.
Changes included in this PR
Vulnerabilities that will be fixed
With an upgrade:
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.6
SNYK-JS-MINIMIST-559764
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
SNYK-JS-MOCHA-561476
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.1
npm:diff:20180305
(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
Commit messages
Package name: mocha
The new version differs by 250 commits.dead initializationwarning for init to global llvm/llvm-project#3886)See the full diff
Package name: vscode
The new version differs by 72 commits.See the full diff
Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.
For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic