Add semicolon to make cppcheck happy #3364
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
BsAtHome
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The option macros RTAPI_MP_*() for RT components/modules need a semicolon to terminate the statement to make cppcheck happy.
These macros, without semicolon, will generate an "unknown macro" error. It only happens when ULAPI is defined because that is true, these are not defined in that case. In practice, having ULAPI defined in RT components is not possible, but cppcheck does not know that.
Luckily it doesn't matter, code-wise, whether or not a semicolon is there. So this PR just makes cppcheck happy and prevents the unknown macro errors by adding the semicolon.