Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

create_clone across systems #943

Open
jedwards4b opened this issue Dec 20, 2016 · 9 comments
Open

create_clone across systems #943

jedwards4b opened this issue Dec 20, 2016 · 9 comments

Comments

@jedwards4b
Copy link
Contributor

Options such as machine and compiler and username should be added to create_clone so that it has the capability to clone across systems. The idea is that create_clone would clone a case on system A creating a new case directory which could be copied to system B and used there.

@rljacob rljacob changed the title create_clone across systems create_clone across systems Jan 27, 2017
@rljacob rljacob added the ready label Jan 27, 2017
rljacob pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2017
1. Corrects the jacobian computation
2. Fixes initial condition when solver restarts
3. Updates auxvars when linesearch rejects a
  full Newton step on the last iteration.

Fixes: #944
Fixes: #945
Fixes: #947

[non-BFB]
@lvankampenhout
Copy link

lvankampenhout commented Apr 13, 2017

On Cheyenne, when running create_clone on a Yellowstone case , I get the following error message. Is this something that should have been addressed by this Issue?
$ ln -s /glade/p/work/hannay/cesm_tags/cesm2_0_beta05_cam5_4_111_finalclm50paramsfile_n12_clm4_5_14_r225 sandbox
$ ./sandbox/cime/scripts/create_clone -clone caseroot -case b.e20.BHIST.f09_g16.20thC.144_01_3hr Creating Case directory /glade/u/home/lvank/cesm/my_cases/bgruns144/b.e20.BHIST.f09_g16.20thC.144_01_3hr Successfully created new case b.e20.BHIST.f09_g16.20thC.144_01_3hr from clone case b.e20.BHIST.f09_g16.20th.144_01 ERROR: module command /glade/apps/opt/lmod/lmod/libexec/lmod python purge failed with message: /bin/sh: /glade/apps/opt/lmod/lmod/libexec/lmod: No such file or directory

@billsacks
Copy link
Member

@lvankampenhout - note that this issue is still open. In a recent discussion, there was agreement that we don't currently expect create_clone to work across machines. I'd recommend that, if you want to continue an existing case, you either (a) continue it on yellowstone, if it's not too costly (we have a few hundred thousand core hours remaining in our yellowstone LIWG accounts), or (b) start a new branch case, if that wouldn't be too difficult to set up.

@lvankampenhout
Copy link

@billsacks thanks. I was under the impression we were strongly discouraged to do anything on Yellowstone anymore so I went ahead by creating a new branch case on Cheyenne. That seems to work fine.

@lvankampenhout
Copy link

What does the label 'ready' at this issue mean? It does not mean it is solved then?

@billsacks
Copy link
Member

What does the label 'ready' at this issue mean? It does not mean it is solved then?

No idea. It's some label that automatically appears on issues for a reason I don't understand. @rljacob - can you clarify what 'ready' means?

@rljacob
Copy link
Member

rljacob commented Apr 13, 2017

"ready" means it is ready to be worked on and has been assigned to someone.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Aug 25, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 5 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Aug 31, 2023
@rljacob
Copy link
Member

rljacob commented Aug 31, 2023

Still think this is useful.

@rljacob rljacob reopened this Aug 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants