Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix DynamicLinq when using IQueryable #116

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 9, 2017

Conversation

jogibear9988
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 9, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #116 into master will increase coverage by 0.2%.
The diff coverage is 90.9%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #116     +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage   83.73%   83.93%   +0.2%     
=========================================
  Files          26       26             
  Lines        3283     3275      -8     
  Branches      486      484      -2     
=========================================
  Hits         2749     2749             
+ Misses        401      395      -6     
+ Partials      133      131      -2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/System.Linq.Dynamic.Core/ExpressionParser.cs 82.31% <90.9%> (+0.4%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0f5a0be...10f4c3e. Read the comment docs.

@jogibear9988 jogibear9988 changed the title Bugfix DyanmicLinq when using IQueryable Do not merge - Bugfix DyanmicLinq when using IQueryable Nov 9, 2017
@jogibear9988 jogibear9988 changed the title Do not merge - Bugfix DyanmicLinq when using IQueryable Bugfix DyanmicLinq when using IQueryable Nov 9, 2017
@StefH StefH changed the title Bugfix DyanmicLinq when using IQueryable Bugfix DynamicLinq when using IQueryable Nov 9, 2017
@StefH StefH merged commit ad44be5 into zzzprojects:master Nov 9, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants