Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split the Functionality table into separate tables with headings #580

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 26, 2025

Conversation

fadeev
Copy link
Member

@fadeev fadeev commented Mar 18, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Redesigned the blockchain functionality guide with structured sections for various chains (e.g., EVM, Bitcoin, Solana, Sui, TON). Tables now clearly present features like deposits, withdrawals, and specific transaction actions, enhancing readability and organization.
  • Chores
    • Removed an obsolete code reference to streamline the codebase.

@fadeev fadeev requested review from a team as code owners March 18, 2025 08:05
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 18, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Mar 18, 2025 8:41am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 18, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request removes a type reference in next-env.d.ts and restructures the blockchain functionality documentation. The type reference removal omits compatibility definitions for Next.js navigation. The documentation file now features clearly defined sections for EVM, Bitcoin, Solana, Sui, and TON, each accompanied by tables outlining functionalities and updated terminology.

Changes

File(s) changed Summary of Changes
next-env.d.ts Removed the reference to next/navigation-types/compat/navigation from the file.
src/pages/developers/chains/... Reorganized documentation by introducing separate headers for blockchain chains (EVM, Bitcoin, Solana, Sui, TON) and updated tables and terminology for enhanced clarity.

Suggested reviewers

  • GMaiolo
  • hernan-clich

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between deb4306 and 59e0f33.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/pages/developers/chains/functionality.mdx (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/pages/developers/chains/functionality.mdx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/pages/developers/chains/functionality.mdx (1)

71-108: Terminology Section: Clear Definitions with Minor Refinement

The Terminology section offers comprehensive definitions that aid in understanding the functionalities. For enhanced readability, consider reviewing punctuation or stylistic consistency (e.g., ending descriptive statements with a period) for a more polished presentation.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 300bdff and 394a6c3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • next-env.d.ts (0 hunks)
  • src/pages/developers/chains/functionality.mdx (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • next-env.d.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/pages/developers/chains/functionality.mdx (5)

1-17: EVM Section: Structured Organization & Clarity

The EVM section is well organized with a clearly defined heading and a neatly formatted table. The use of status icons (✅, ⚠️, ❌) is consistent and enhances readability. No issues detected.


18-24: Bitcoin Section: Clear Documentation

The Bitcoin section includes a concise table with proper column headers and status indicators, which makes the functionality easily understandable.


25-40: Solana Section: Consistent Presentation

The Solana section maintains clarity with its detailed table layout. The consistent use of formatting and icons ensures that readers can quickly interpret the capabilities.


41-55: Sui Section: Accurate and Consistent

The Sui section is consistent with earlier sections, and the table accurately reflects the intended functionalities. The overall structure enhances the document's clarity.


56-70: TON Section: Well-Structured Table

The TON section is clearly delineated and follows the same effective structure as the other sections, ensuring uniformity across the documentation.

@fadeev fadeev merged commit fc3c07b into main Mar 26, 2025
6 checks passed
@fadeev fadeev deleted the functionality-split-tables branch March 26, 2025 07:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Split the table on the Functionality page into multiple tables with headings
3 participants