Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Different versions of Rn different results #116

Open
a22063821 opened this issue Aug 22, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Different versions of Rn different results #116

a22063821 opened this issue Aug 22, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@a22063821
Copy link

a22063821 commented Aug 22, 2017

Time and parameters are the same

Rn4.14 results

90001

Top left corner white died

Rn4.20.4 results

9002

Top left corner white is alive

Why is this situation?
Rn4.14 grasp the superiority
Rn4.20.4 give away the advantage

@crayzok
Copy link

crayzok commented Aug 22, 2017

I think Rn4.14 made a bad choice and 4.20 picked not bad choice(stable choice).

Rn4.14 missed fact that 6 black stones cannot live despite of A10 move.

Rn4.20 knew that and she felt that Ko at the left-top corner is quite burdensome...

Because black group at the left-top corner are still not alive too.

And she judged that black still hold a lead this game after black give away 5 black stones at the left side.

00

01

If I just connect 4 black stones at the left side by putting D9, that's super-Ko.

@a22063821
Copy link
Author

a22063821 commented Aug 22, 2017

908

C-point location will be better Rn

Rn 10 times choices, 6 times A, 3 times B, 1 times C
Rn selects C chances low

@crayzok
Copy link

crayzok commented Aug 22, 2017

yeah, choice of A is stable because it removes Ko but it gives away 4 black stones.

choice of B and C is risky because black group at the left top corner aren't still alive but combative and favorable choice.

B is better than C because of Ko threat(劫材) and B9 move of white.

zakki pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 16, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants