Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add MIT license type to gemspec; #103

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

strouptl
Copy link
Collaborator

@strouptl strouptl commented Mar 6, 2025

Add "MIT" license type to gemspec (resolves #101).

@strouptl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

strouptl commented Mar 6, 2025

@strzibny, it looks like our tests for Rails 7.0 are failing due to a compatibility issue between Rails 7.0, and the latest version of concurrent-ruby (1.3.5), which was released on February 5th. The issue is resolved in Rails 7.1, but it does not look like it is being addressed in Rails 7.0.

Is it OK if we drop support for Rails 7.0 to resolve these issues? We are a little early, but support for Rails 7.0 ends anyway on April 1st, 2025.

References:

@strzibny
Copy link
Collaborator

strzibny commented Mar 7, 2025

Yes

@strouptl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

strouptl commented Mar 7, 2025

Great! I have created a PR for it here: #105.

@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Gem::Specification.new do |gem|
gem.description = "OTP authentication for Devise"
gem.summary = "Time Based OTP/rfc6238 compatible authentication for Devise"
gem.homepage = "https://github.com/wmlele/devise-otp"
gem.license = 'MIT'
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a small thing, but let's keep strings with " (double quote) so it's all same.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Missing MIT License in Gemspec Causes Compliance Issues
2 participants