-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 207
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Wrapper for cluster as in ISSUE #113 #128
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have you tried using the existing wrapper with the cluster client?
When I compare these files
https://github.com/adjust/rmq/blob/3113601ad47836e110cd3201f160b69c172f9770/redis_wrapper_single.go
https://github.com/adjust/rmq/blob/3113601ad47836e110cd3201f160b69c172f9770/redis_wrapper_cluster.go
it looks like the cluster client has exactly the same functions, so I wonder if it might actually implement the
redis.Cmdable
interface, in which case we should be able to still use the existing wrapper instead of having the need for two different (but almost identical) wrapper implementations.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes I have tried, works fine with me 💯
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This also confuses me, the
redis.Client
does implement theredis.Cmdable
, but,redis.ClusterClient
does not.I have checked the wrapper functions, which is common, and my team also wrapped same functions both for cluster and single redis.
It also needs some work to do to make the code more elegent, such as making new interface to fit the two type of redis clients, I will see what I can do in the future, thanks for pointing out! 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The redis.ClusterClient has implementd Cmdable already, so this wrapper might be not necessary
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for jumping in here! 🙌
Do you think you can take this branch and remove this wrapper again to see if it works without it? Feel free to open a new PR with the updated branch then. Thanks again!