chore: allow firebase-admin v12

[luc122c]

The Firebase Admin SDK for Node has been bumped to v12. This currently leads to unmet peer dependency warnings:

 WARN  Issues with peer dependencies found
 
└─┬ nuxt-vuefire 1.0.0
  └── ✕ unmet peer firebase-admin@^11.3.0: found 12.0.0

This PR adds v12 to the allowed ranges.

[posva]

Thanks! It looks like firebase-functions are still not supporting firebase-admin 12, so we will have to wait a bit longer. I pushed changes to actually change the peer dep (it wasn't changed)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (1e2c71e) 75.93% compared to head (96a6de4) 75.93%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1473   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   75.93%   75.93%           
=======================================
  Files          21       21           
  Lines        3387     3387           
  Branches      263      263           
=======================================
  Hits         2572     2572           
  Misses        815      815           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[luc122c]

I pushed changes to actually change the peer dep (it wasn't changed)

Oops, missed that! Thanks :)

[luc122c]

Thanks! It looks like firebase-functions are still not supporting firebase-admin 12, so we will have to wait a bit longer.

It looks like there is a PR tracking this: firebase/firebase-functions#1496

[posva]

Thanks for the PR. I will locally update once the upstream issue is fixed.

[prvashisht]

@posva it was merged a few hours after you closed this :D any update on this fix?

• Update the supported Admin SDK version to include v12 firebase/firebase-functions#1509
• Extend support for firebase-admin@12. firebase/firebase-functions-test#220

[luc122c]

@posva Is there any chance this could be looked at again please?