-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 165
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[RNG][Device API] Added (u)int8_t and (u)int16_t types support for Uniform #632
Open
egrabovskaya
wants to merge
9
commits into
uxlfoundation:develop
Choose a base branch
from
egrabovskaya:small_types_support_in_uniform
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+190
−72
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
17b25ef
Added (u)int8_t and (u)int16_t types support for Uniform
egrabovskaya 8ebd95b
applied clang format
egrabovskaya fbe2973
generalized moments calculating for types in Uniform
egrabovskaya 5338505
applied clang format and fixed namespace
egrabovskaya 49f359f
updated b bound description
egrabovskaya e11cb6d
Removed extra conditions
egrabovskaya fdd654f
fix
egrabovskaya ade425b
clang format
egrabovskaya c85068e
distr params in calculate_and_compare_moments_uniform are always doub…
egrabovskaya File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would suggest to move this dispatch above to have floating type definition in one place, e.g.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it looks clearer with the extra condition. Furthermore, the existing condition relates to (u)int32, (u)int64 and floating point precision types. But with the option you suggested we will have less additional code.
@iMartyan, could you please share your opinion here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also like Andrey's approach more because the generation method is the same. So, better not to split it into several branches.