Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Incorrect link to JSON schema integer type in datatypes docs #488

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2019
Merged

Incorrect link to JSON schema integer type in datatypes docs #488

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2019

Conversation

anweiss
Copy link
Contributor

@anweiss anweiss commented Sep 5, 2019

Committer Notes

The JSON schema integer type in the datatype docs had the wrong external reference link. This PR addresses this with the correct link.

All Submissions:

  • Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
  • Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
  • Have you squashed any non-relevant commits and commit messages? [instructions]
  • Do all automated CI/CD checks pass?

david-waltermire
david-waltermire approved these changes Sep 26, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@david-waltermire david-waltermire left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@david-waltermire david-waltermire merged commit 19707e5 into usnistgov:master Sep 26, 2019
david-waltermire pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2019
publish: update JSON schema integer type ref link (#488)
7ba1d41 
generated from commit 19707e5
bradh pushed a commit to bradh/OSCAL that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2019
@anweiss @bradh
update JSON schema integer type ref link (usnistgov#488)
854ebef
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@david-waltermire david-waltermire david-waltermire approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@anweiss @david-waltermire