You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Which Umbraco version are you using? (Please write the exact version, example: 10.1.0)
15.2.3
Bug summary
Assume two developers start there package with the Umbraco Extension template and let some of the configuration unchanged. Then these packages may cause conflicts and override there methods etc.
Specifics
Issue Details
There are some places where the examples need to be changed. And I think these are not obvious to beginners.
For example the Client folder is not changed to something unique like the package name.
Same for customElement name and maybe the related class name in dashboards.element.ts
Finally meta:pathname and meta:label in dashboards/manifest.ts should be changed too
Even mor tricky might beexport const client = createClient(createConfig());in api/services.gen.ts. I am not sure if this is an issue. It seems to work and did not see errors in Dev Tools.
My proposal for a solution
I have manually changed the above mentioned names and here some screenshot how the Dev Tools should look like:
Steps to reproduce
Create two packages with the Umbraco Extension template
Change some text the render() method in one of the example dashboard.element.ts
Create the packages for your local NuGet source
Install both packages into a new Umbraco WebSite project
Run and see that you don't two different dashboards. In Dev Tools: Sources tab you'll see just one Client folder etc.
Expected result / actual result
I would expect from such template that it does all necessary changes to produce a unique starting point for a new package.
At least there should be a detailed checklist for what needs to be changed. But we all know that such lists tend to be overlooked or ignored.
Finally I am pretty sure this issue could be solved and I'll try to provide a possible solution...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Firstly, a big thank you for raising this issue. Every piece of feedback we receive helps us to make Umbraco better.
We really appreciate your patience while we wait for our team to have a look at this but we wanted to let you know that we see this and share with you the plan for what comes next.
We'll assess whether this issue relates to something that has already been fixed in a later version of the release that it has been raised for.
If it's a bug, is it related to a release that we are actively supporting or is it related to a release that's in the end-of-life or security-only phase?
We'll replicate the issue to ensure that the problem is as described.
We'll decide whether the behavior is an issue or if the behavior is intended.
We wish we could work with everyone directly and assess your issue immediately but we're in the fortunate position of having lots of contributions to work with and only a few humans who are able to do it. We are making progress though and in the meantime, we will keep you in the loop and let you know when we have any questions.
Which Umbraco version are you using? (Please write the exact version, example: 10.1.0)
15.2.3
Bug summary
Assume two developers start there package with the Umbraco Extension template and let some of the configuration unchanged. Then these packages may cause conflicts and override there methods etc.
Specifics
Issue Details
There are some places where the examples need to be changed. And I think these are not obvious to beginners.
export const client = createClient(createConfig());
in api/services.gen.ts. I am not sure if this is an issue. It seems to work and did not see errors in Dev Tools.My proposal for a solution
I have manually changed the above mentioned names and here some screenshot how the Dev Tools should look like:
Steps to reproduce
dashboard.element.ts
Expected result / actual result
I would expect from such template that it does all necessary changes to produce a unique starting point for a new package.
At least there should be a detailed checklist for what needs to be changed. But we all know that such lists tend to be overlooked or ignored.
Finally I am pretty sure this issue could be solved and I'll try to provide a possible solution...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: