Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restructure radiation field #2474

Merged
merged 108 commits into from
Dec 11, 2023

Conversation

wkerzendorf
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@wkerzendorf wkerzendorf force-pushed the restructure/radiation_field branch 2 times, most recently from 6a45fe5 to b7f0c53 Compare December 4, 2023 05:40
@wkerzendorf wkerzendorf force-pushed the restructure/radiation_field branch from b7f0c53 to 361e0b7 Compare December 4, 2023 05:43
@tardis-bot
Copy link
Contributor

tardis-bot commented Dec 4, 2023

*beep* *bop*

Hi, human.

The docs workflow has succeeded ✔️

Click here to see your results.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 19 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (caffb25) 68.36% compared to head (1cc8004) 68.47%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files Patch % Lines
tardis/io/model_reader.py 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
tardis/model/parse_input.py 85.10% 7 Missing ⚠️
tardis/model/geometry/radial1d.py 83.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
...dis/montecarlo/montecarlo_numba/tests/test_base.py 94.73% 2 Missing ⚠️
tardis/model/base.py 95.65% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2474      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.36%   68.47%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         158      159       +1     
  Lines       13861    13854       -7     
==========================================
+ Hits         9476     9487      +11     
+ Misses       4385     4367      -18     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@andrewfullard andrewfullard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two very minor comments

@jvshields
Copy link
Contributor

The code looks good to me. Waiting to see if the build-docs passes and then approving if so.

@jvshields jvshields self-requested a review December 11, 2023 15:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants