Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert mono/.NET Framework integration tests #1462

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 6, 2024

Conversation

Rob-Hague
Copy link
Collaborator

This combination is not a worthwhile use of time

Ref #1458 (comment) and #1456

Copy link
Collaborator

@scott-xu scott-xu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's okay for me.
However, regarding #1461, we have to run .NET Framework tests (can use --filter Name~ECDsa) at Linux with Mono to verify if it fixes #1406.

@Rob-Hague
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ok but note that Xamarin is now EOL, so it also may not be worth your time. And sockets can't run in the browser so mono/WebAssembly is not relevant to us - I don't think there are any officially supported, commonly used scenarios under mono which are relevant to us

@scott-xu
Copy link
Collaborator

scott-xu commented Aug 5, 2024

Can we keep Ecdh and Zlib? We need to make sure .NET Framework specific code to be tested.
--filter "Name~Ecdh|Name~Zlib"

We don't need to worry about ChaCha20Poly1305 as there's no .NET Framework specific code for it. It is covered by .NET 8.0 integration test.

@Rob-Hague
Copy link
Collaborator Author

If it doesn't cause any issues, then fine. I'll try it on the DSA branch. Otherwise it is easy enough to run them properly locally

@Rob-Hague Rob-Hague merged commit 64d67cd into sshnet:develop Aug 6, 2024
1 check passed
@Rob-Hague Rob-Hague deleted the revertmono branch August 6, 2024 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants