This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 22, 2025. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
harden cli tests #34844
Merged
Merged
harden cli tests #34844
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this correct? it says
2 * fee_two_sig
which would be 4?!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's original test logic :) I only rename the
fee
tofee_two_sig
for consistency. It checks2 * fee_two_sig
at ln 368 below, feels intended.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
read the test, it sign a two-signature transaction twice that transfers
42.0
sol.offline_fee_payer_signer
is one of the signer (eg payer) that is initiated with1 + 2 * fee_two_sig
. After submitted transaction, it's balance should beoriginal_balance - fee_for_two_sig_transaction = (1 + 2 * fee_two_sig) - fee_two_sig = 1 + fee_two_sig
. Which it asserts at Ln#470:So you are right that
offline_fee_payer_signer
does not need to be initialized with2 *
. But the test is still valid, even a bit of confusing. Happy to straight it out separately.