fix: prevents rspec collision

[pftg]

Closes: #136

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced error handling for screenshot mismatches.
  • Added a test case to ensure compatibility with RSpec methods.

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved clarity in error management logic.

• Documentation

  • Updated comments for better clarity on method functionality.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request addresses a conflict between the raise_error method in the Capybara Screenshot Diff library and RSpec's error handling. The primary change involves renaming the internal raise_error method to _raise_error in the Capybara::Screenshot::Diff::TestMethods module. This modification prevents method name collisions with RSpec's raise_error matcher. Additionally, a new test case was added to verify that RSpec methods remain functional after the changes.

Changes

File	Change Summary
lib/capybara/screenshot/diff/test_methods.rb	- Renamed raise_error method to _raise_error - Updated internal error handling logic
test/fixtures/files/rspec_spec.rb	- Added new test case to check RSpec method compatibility

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Resolve conflict with RSpec's raise_error [#136]	✅
Prevent method name collision	✅

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of code so bright,
Where raise_error took flight
Renamed with care, no more strife
RSpec and screenshots now dance with life!
Harmony restored, bugs take flight 🚀

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d1adc5a and 48d4530.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• test/fixtures/app/doc/screenshots/macos/cuprite/index.png is excluded by !**/*.png

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• lib/capybara/screenshot/diff/test_methods.rb (3 hunks)
• test/fixtures/files/rspec_spec.rb (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (3)

test/fixtures/files/rspec_spec.rb (1)

40-42: LGTM! Well-crafted test case.

The test effectively verifies that RSpec's raise_error matcher remains functional after the changes, directly addressing the collision issue.

lib/capybara/screenshot/diff/test_methods.rb (2)

171-173: LGTM! Good use of Ruby naming convention.

The renaming of raise_error to _raise_error effectively prevents collision with RSpec's matcher while following Ruby's convention of using underscore prefix for internal methods. The implementation remains clean and the method is correctly placed in the private section.

---

Line range hint 128-144: Verify error handling remains intact.

The error handling logic has been updated to use _raise_error. Let's verify there are no other instances of the old method name in the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

All instances of error handling have been properly updated to use _raise_error

The verification shows that all error handling in the codebase has been consistently updated. The only instances found are:

• Three correct usages of _raise_error in lib/capybara/screenshot/diff/test_methods.rb
• One unrelated RSpec matcher usage in a test file (raise_error in test/fixtures/files/rspec_spec.rb)

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining instances of the old method name
# that might have been missed during the rename.

# Search for direct method calls
echo "Checking for direct 'raise_error' method calls:"
rg -p "raise_error\(" --type ruby

# Search for method definitions
echo "Checking for 'raise_error' method definitions:"
ast-grep --pattern 'def raise_error'

Length of output: 623

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.