Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[stable] 1.29.0 stable release #54117

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2018
Merged

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=1000

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 11, 2018

📌 Commit 0cbaa49 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Sep 11, 2018
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against stable. Please double check that you specified the right target!

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 11, 2018
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum changed the title 1.29.0 stable release [stable] 1.29.0 stable release Sep 11, 2018
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 11, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 0cbaa49 with merge aa3ca19...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 11, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing aa3ca19 to stable...

@bors bors merged commit 0cbaa49 into rust-lang:stable Sep 11, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants