-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 262
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
build: bump jackson version #2715
Conversation
pipeline:run |
ac1af7a
to
afba7c0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. I just have a single doubt to understand the reason behind the testing change, because I am curious.
int depth = 998; | ||
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(content.length() + 2*depth); | ||
for (long i = 0; i < depth; i++) { | ||
sb.append("["); | ||
} | ||
sb.append(content); | ||
for (long i = 0; i < depth; i++) { | ||
sb.append("]"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
question:
Is it optimising because isn't necessary a loop big how was it? Did you had to change because it was failing? What's the reason for the change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you're right. basically to improve perf of the test a bit. This test was hanging a bit
5a3bfe9
to
101110a
Compare
101110a
to
e0cb416
Compare
|
Description
2.15.4
StreamConstraintsException
exception (which was introduced in the newer version)in the
JsonRpcWeb3ServerHandler
classMotivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
Types of changes
Checklist:
fed:vovchyk/jackson-ver-bump