-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Conversation
merge into local fork
Extend the noise policy to all talks, clarify policy on attendance codes, correct capitalization of bullets
👍 Excellent work! |
### Attendance Codes | ||
Attendance codes are given during all RCOS small group, large group, and bonus sessions. When the attendance code is delivered, go to http://rcos.io, click "Attend", and enter the attendance code so you can be marked as present for the current session. | ||
|
||
As much as we value sharing and openness, we also value integrity. Thus, we ask that you do not distribute attendance codes to people who are not currently attending the session. If you are caught distributing attendance codes to people who are absent, **both your attendance code as well as the attendance code(s) you distributed to others will be nullified**. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AdrianCollado @Bad-Science This is the primary addition to the CoC - any objection to the following?
If you are caught distributing attendance codes to people who are absent, both your attendance code as well as the attendance code(s) you distributed to others will be nullified.
Realistically I don't think there's much we could do about nullifying the attendance of the individual who shared the code, but I think it's worthy of inclusion to discourage such behavior. Thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could compromise by just nullifying the codes that were shared, making it kinda pointless to share them. However, that could be interpreted to mean there is no consequence for the person who shared them. We could say something along the lines of "the attendance codes you distributed to others will be nullified, and you may be subject to further consequences at the discretion of faculty" but the last part of that seems a bit scary. We could say repeat offenses may be subject to consequences at the discretion of faculty instead
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is good. Even if we couldn't enforce it every time it's a good policy to have on the books.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Speaking of that - the mentors and coordinators should probably do a better job enforcing the noise policy --- having it be universal should hopefully help so it'll become a norm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 I'm 100% on board with these updates - will merge after @AdrianCollado and @Bad-Science weigh in :)
Looks good to me! Thanks @kburk1997 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
Note that all major changes are added to RPI specific policies, so any projects using our provided Code of Conduct template may continue to use it.