Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add back --skip-lock flag using the new utilities. #5847

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

Add back --skip-lock flag using the new utilities. #5847

merged 6 commits into from
Aug 22, 2023

Conversation

matteius
Copy link
Member

Not sure yet if this will work right, will require some testing.

The issue

As pointed out in issue #5842 the --skip-lock flag was being used by some folks that had no choice because of cross platform dependencies. At least until we address that, add back the --skip-lock flag but using the new utilities.

The checklist

  • Associated issue
  • A news fragment in the news/ directory to describe this fix with the extension .bugfix.rst, .feature.rst, .behavior.rst, .doc.rst. .vendor.rst. or .trivial.rst (this will appear in the release changelog). Use semantic line breaks and name the file after the issue number or the PR #.

@matteius matteius requested a review from oz123 August 22, 2023 09:35
@matteius matteius marked this pull request as ready for review August 22, 2023 09:42
@matteius matteius merged commit c8f4465 into main Aug 22, 2023
@matteius matteius deleted the skip-lock branch August 22, 2023 10:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants