-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
eip7251: Bugfix and more withdrawal tests #14578
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
27f6a7a
addressing bug with withdrawals for devnet 5
james-prysm 0bd792d
changelog
james-prysm 7c3647b
fixing if statement check
james-prysm e907068
adding test
james-prysm 9020f6e
Merge branch 'develop' into withdrawal-bug-electra
james-prysm e297cf2
terence's review comments
james-prysm 1148036
attempting to fix weird comment formatting
james-prysm d6d93c9
moving back more comments
james-prysm e3575fa
Merge branch 'develop' into withdrawal-bug-electra
james-prysm 98dab0b
Merge branch 'develop' into withdrawal-bug-electra
james-prysm 7da95b8
Update CHANGELOG.md
james-prysm d1e1d84
Merge branch 'develop' into withdrawal-bug-electra
james-prysm 59de0e6
Merge branch 'develop' into withdrawal-bug-electra
james-prysm File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is fine and not really worth optimizing, it's nice to read along the spec, but if you want to optimize it, we could use a map or track the length of withdrawals before entering the for loop and break at that index.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i'm not sure if that's worth it, the withdrawals should be pretty short here