Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add basic EASExcubia implementation #4

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

0xjei
Copy link
Member

@0xjei 0xjei commented Jun 13, 2024

Description

This PR introduces the basic form of an EASExcubia extension. This excubia allows the gate to check if the passerby has a given attestation with a given schema in order to pass. This contract implements a mapping to avoid using the same attestation to pass twice.

Other information

Please, note that this is a porting of the MACI EAS Gatekeeper.

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have run yarn format and yarn compile without getting any errors
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

@0xjei 0xjei requested review from cedoor, vplasencia and ctrlc03 June 13, 2024 10:48
@0xjei 0xjei force-pushed the feat/eas-excubia branch from 2829fc8 to 7132e0b Compare June 14, 2024 09:33
@0xjei 0xjei requested a review from ctrlc03 June 14, 2024 09:34
Copy link

@ctrlc03 ctrlc03 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good stuff thank you!

@0xjei 0xjei merged commit 1b95984 into proposal/gatekeepers Jun 14, 2024
2 checks passed
@cedoor cedoor deleted the feat/eas-excubia branch June 26, 2024 11:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants