Fix new internal connection javadoc #3184
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Romain Courtier <romain.courtier@rte-france.com>
rcourtier
force-pushed
the
fix_new_internal_connection_javadoc
branch
from
6313186 to
1edc019
Compare
olperr1
approved these changes
Oct 24, 2024
|
olperr1
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2024
Signed-off-by: Romain Courtier <romain.courtier@rte-france.com> (cherry picked from commit c04dde7)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
No
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Fix the javadoc for a method present in the API.
What is the current behavior?
Method description is incorrect.
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Method description has been fixed.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?
Other information: