Ignore Readline screen size detection when no TTY is present #16
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thank you for this PR! I decided to approach this slightly differently and added a few tests to cover all the edge cases in e342f8f |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe the change
Ignore Readline screen size detection when no TTY is present.
Why are we doing this?
To fix issue #15. It's causes failures when running fastlane on Windows, see this fix.
Benefits
Method
sizewill return sane defaults instead of[1,1]when called without TTY on Windows.Drawbacks
Risk of breaking functionality for users that rely on existing behavior.
Requirements
masterbranch?