Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update jackson.version to v2.15.0 #5065

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 2, 2023

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 24, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotations (source) 2.14.2 -> 2.15.0 age adoption passing confidence
com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jsr310 2.14.2 -> 2.15.0 age adoption passing confidence
com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jdk8 2.14.2 -> 2.15.0 age adoption passing confidence
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind (source) 2.14.2 -> 2.15.0 age adoption passing confidence
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core 2.14.2 -> 2.15.0 age adoption passing confidence

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@leonardehrenfried
Copy link
Member

It appears that record serialization works differently in Jackson 2.15. I'm unsure if this is a regression or happened intentionally.

@t2gran t2gran added this to the 2.4 milestone Apr 24, 2023
@renovate
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Apr 25, 2023

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@leonardehrenfried leonardehrenfried force-pushed the renovate/jackson.version branch from a56b9c2 to 78ecb3d Compare April 25, 2023 10:22
@leonardehrenfried leonardehrenfried force-pushed the renovate/jackson.version branch from 78ecb3d to c113efc Compare April 25, 2023 10:55
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 25, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.11 🎉

Comparison is base (752e160) 64.50% compared to head (c113efc) 64.62%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             dev-2.x    #5065      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      64.50%   64.62%   +0.11%     
- Complexity     13866    13889      +23     
=============================================
  Files           1710     1710              
  Lines          67026    67054      +28     
  Branches        7204     7206       +2     
=============================================
+ Hits           43233    43331      +98     
+ Misses         21374    21301      -73     
- Partials        2419     2422       +3     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ting/api/request/preference/StreetPreferences.java 91.46% <ø> (ø)
...pentripplanner/standalone/config/RouterConfig.java 87.03% <100.00%> (-0.47%) ⬇️
...dalone/config/routerequest/RouteRequestConfig.java 98.02% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

... and 10 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@leonardehrenfried leonardehrenfried merged commit 731285a into dev-2.x May 2, 2023
@leonardehrenfried leonardehrenfried deleted the renovate/jackson.version branch May 2, 2023 07:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants