Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1718052: Do not log OAuth tokens in audit logs #205

Merged

Conversation

enj
Copy link
Contributor

@enj enj commented Jun 6, 2019

Even the metadata level is not safe as metadata.name is the secret.

Signed-off-by: Monis Khan mkhan@redhat.com

@deads2k

Even the metadata level is not safe as metadata.name is the secret.

Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mkhan@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 6, 2019
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Jun 6, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 6, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, enj

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 6, 2019
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Jun 6, 2019

/cherrypick release-4.1

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@deads2k: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.1 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.1

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@enj enj changed the title Do not log OAuth tokens in audit logs Bug 1718052: Do not log OAuth tokens in audit logs Jun 6, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 6, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@enj: This pull request references a valid Bugzilla bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1718052: Do not log OAuth tokens in audit logs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@deads2k: new pull request created: #206

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.1

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Jun 7, 2019

/cherrypick approved

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@deads2k: cannot checkout approved: error checking out approved: exit status 1. output: error: pathspec 'approved' did not match any file(s) known to git.

In response to this:

/cherrypick approved

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants