Bug 1733474: Revendor MAO with timeout formatting fix #109

alexander-demicev · 2020-08-03T09:26:57Z

Revendor MAO with timeout formatting fix

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-08-03T09:27:06Z

@alexander-demichev: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1810531, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.4.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.4.z)
bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1804635 is in the state RELEASE_PENDING, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
dependent Bugzilla bug 1804635 targets the "4.5.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.5.0, 4.5.z
bug has dependents

In response to this:

Bug 1810531: Revendor MAO with timeout formatting fix

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

enxebre · 2020-08-03T09:45:47Z

/approve

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-08-03T09:46:03Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: enxebre

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [enxebre]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

JoelSpeed · 2020-08-10T13:58:06Z

/lgtm

jwforres · 2020-08-20T23:31:54Z

4.4 is in maintenance phase, please provide the justification for backport for a low severity BZ

JoelSpeed · 2020-08-21T12:22:09Z

I don't think is worth backporting at this point, it's mostly cosmetic
/close

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-08-21T12:22:24Z

@JoelSpeed: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

I don't think is worth backporting at this point, it's mostly cosmetic
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-08-21T12:22:28Z

@alexander-demichev: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1810531. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Bug 1810531: Revendor MAO with timeout formatting fix

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

michaelgugino · 2020-08-21T14:02:30Z

/reopen

michaelgugino · 2020-08-21T14:02:47Z

/open

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-08-21T14:02:49Z

@michaelgugino: Reopened this PR.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-08-21T14:02:52Z

@alexander-demichev: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1810531, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE) instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1810531: Revendor MAO with timeout formatting fix

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-08-21T19:16:51Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-08-22T01:00:59Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-08-22T01:01:02Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1810531, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE) instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-08-23T01:00:58Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-08-23T01:01:01Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1810531, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE) instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-08-28T01:00:37Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-08-28T01:00:40Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1810531, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE) instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-08-29T01:00:27Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-08-29T01:00:30Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1810531, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE) instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-08-30T01:00:25Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-08-30T01:00:28Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1810531, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE) instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-08-31T01:00:25Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-08-31T01:00:28Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1810531, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE) instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

alexander-demicev · 2020-08-31T14:34:28Z

/title Bug 1733474: Revendor MAO with timeout formatting fix

alexander-demicev · 2020-08-31T14:36:36Z

/retitle Bug 1733474: Revendor MAO with timeout formatting fix

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-08-31T14:36:58Z

@alexander-demichev: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1733474, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.4.z" release, but it targets "4.4.0" instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1733474 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.5.0, 4.5.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1733474: Revendor MAO with timeout formatting fix

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

alexander-demicev · 2020-08-31T14:48:37Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-08-31T14:48:41Z

@alexander-demichev: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1733474, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1874097 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

alexander-demicev · 2020-08-31T14:52:22Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-08-31T14:52:28Z

@alexander-demichev: An error was encountered adding this pull request to the external tracker bugs for bug 1733474 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

JSONRPC error 32000: There was an error reported for a GitHub REST call. URL: https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/cluster-api-provider-gcp/pulls/109 Error: 403 Forbidden at /loader/0x559665cbd300/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Type/GitHub.pm line 111. at /loader/0x559665cbd300/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Type/GitHub.pm line 111. eval {...} called at /loader/0x559665cbd300/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Type/GitHub.pm line 98 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Type::GitHub::_do_rest_call('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Type::GitHub=HASH(0x559672...', 'https://api.github.com/repos/openshift/cluster-api-provider-g...', 'GET') called at /loader/0x559665cbd300/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Type/GitHub.pm line 62 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Type::GitHub::get_data('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Type::GitHub=HASH(0x559672...', 'Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug=HASH(0x559672d195d0)') called at /loader/0x559665cbd300/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 302 eval {...} called at /loader/0x559665cbd300/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 302 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::update_ext_info('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug=HASH(0x559672d195d0)', 1) called at /loader/0x559665cbd300/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 125 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::create('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug', 'HASH(0x559672cec4c0)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/extensions/ExternalBugs/Extension.pm line 877 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::bug_start_of_update('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs=HASH(0x559672b29400)', 'HASH(0x559672cc0100)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Hook.pm line 21 Bugzilla::Hook::process('bug_start_of_update', 'HASH(0x559672cc0100)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1170 Bugzilla::Bug::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x559672cbed88)') called at /loader/0x559665cbd300/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/WebService.pm line 88 Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::WebService::add_external_bug('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x559672ae6780)') called at (eval 1957) line 1 eval ' $procedure->{code}->($self, @params) ;' called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 220 JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x559672b37118)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 295 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x559672b37118)') called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 126 JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 70 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/jsonrpc.cgi line 31 ModPerl::ROOT::Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::var_www_html_bugzilla_jsonrpc_2ecgi::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55967297bbe0)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 eval {...} called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::run('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x559672b28e18)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 173 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::default_handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x559672b28e18)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/Registry.pm line 32 ModPerl::Registry::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55967297bbe0)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/mod_perl.pl line 139 Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55967297bbe0)') called at (eval 1957) line 0 eval {...} called at (eval 1957) line 0
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

alexander-demicev · 2020-08-31T14:53:32Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-08-31T14:53:37Z

@alexander-demichev: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1733474, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.4.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.4.z)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1874097 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
dependent Bugzilla bug 1874097 targets the "4.5.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.5.0, 4.5.z
bug has dependents

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

eparis · 2020-09-10T23:27:03Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-09-10T23:27:07Z

@eparis: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1733474, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.4.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.4.z)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1874097 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
dependent Bugzilla bug 1874097 targets the "4.5.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.5.0, 4.5.z
bug has dependents

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-09-11T00:01:56Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-09-11T17:46:28Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-09-11T18:38:27Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-09-11T19:04:24Z

@alexander-demichev: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1733474 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1733474: Revendor MAO with timeout formatting fix

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Revendor MAO with timeout formatting fix

598720c

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 3, 2020

openshift-ci-robot requested review from bison and michaelgugino August 3, 2020 09:27

openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 3, 2020

openshift-ci-robot assigned JoelSpeed Aug 10, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 10, 2020

jwforres added the priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done. label Aug 20, 2020

openshift-ci-robot closed this Aug 21, 2020

openshift-ci-robot reopened this Aug 21, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 21, 2020

openshift-ci-robot changed the title ~~Bug 1810531: Revendor MAO with timeout formatting fix~~ Bug 1733474: Revendor MAO with timeout formatting fix Aug 31, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 31, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 31, 2020

openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 31, 2020

eparis added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Sep 10, 2020

openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4dc3c41 into openshift:release-4.4 Sep 11, 2020

Bug 1733474: Revendor MAO with timeout formatting fix #109

Bug 1733474: Revendor MAO with timeout formatting fix #109

Conversation

alexander-demicev commented Aug 3, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 3, 2020

enxebre commented Aug 3, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 3, 2020

JoelSpeed commented Aug 10, 2020

jwforres commented Aug 20, 2020

JoelSpeed commented Aug 21, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 21, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 21, 2020

michaelgugino commented Aug 21, 2020

michaelgugino commented Aug 21, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 21, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 21, 2020

openshift-bot commented Aug 21, 2020

openshift-bot commented Aug 22, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 22, 2020

openshift-bot commented Aug 23, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 23, 2020

openshift-bot commented Aug 28, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 28, 2020

openshift-bot commented Aug 29, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 29, 2020

openshift-bot commented Aug 30, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 30, 2020

openshift-bot commented Aug 31, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 31, 2020

alexander-demicev commented Aug 31, 2020

alexander-demicev commented Aug 31, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 31, 2020

alexander-demicev commented Aug 31, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 31, 2020

alexander-demicev commented Aug 31, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 31, 2020

alexander-demicev commented Aug 31, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 31, 2020

eparis commented Sep 10, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 10, 2020

openshift-bot commented Sep 11, 2020

openshift-bot commented Sep 11, 2020

openshift-bot commented Sep 11, 2020

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 11, 2020