Feat Automatic cdn invalidation #665
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
commit: |
sommeeeer
reviewed
Dec 4, 2024
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: f1d92e4 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 3 packages
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
conico974
force-pushed
the
feat/automatic-cdn-invalidation
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f6a29a9 to
106f7d4
Compare
conico974
force-pushed
the
feat/automatic-cdn-invalidation
branch
from
fefef41 to
21ee706
Compare
vicb
reviewed
Jan 17, 2025
vicb
reviewed
Jan 17, 2025
vicb
reviewed
Jan 17, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix #658
Still a bit of work to do on this one, it will require a refactor ofInternalEvent(orRoutingResult) and the routingHandler so that we have access to the information we need (Or maybe we can use the async hook context)Should be ready for review