Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier to v3.19 #119

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 6, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier (source) 3.18.2 -> 3.19 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

jqno/equalsverifier (nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier)

v3.19

Added
  • forPackage(String packageName, ScanOption... option) overload. This provides a more consistent way to fine-tune the scanning of packages. ScanOption provides several features, which can be mixed and matched:
    • ScanOption.recursive() to search recursively. This replaces forPackage(String packageName, boolean scanRecursively).
    • ScanOption.mustExtend(Class<?> type) to find only classes that extend or implement the given type. This replaces forPackage(String packageName, Class<?> mustExtend). Note that this overload used to search recursively too; this is no longer the case. If you want a recursive search that also only matches subtypes, you have to combine ScanOption.recursive() and ScanOption.mustExtend(Class<?> type).
    • ScanOption.except(Class<?>... types) to find all classes except the given ones. This replaces forPackage(...).except(Class<?>... types).
    • ScanOption.except(Predicate<Class<?>> exclusionPredicate) to exclude all classes that match the given predicate. This replaces forPackage(...).except(Predicate<Class<?>> exclusionPredicate).
    • ScanOption.ignoreExternalJars() to not throw an exception when attempting to scan a package from a third-party jar file. This can be useful if you have a split package between a dependency and your own codebase. This is a new option. (Issue 1040)
Deprecated
  • forPackage(String packageName, boolean scanRecursively): replaced by ScanOption.recursive().
  • forPackage(String packageName, Class<?> mustExtend): replaced by ScanOption.mustExtend(Class<?> type) combined with ScanOption.recursive().
  • forPackage(...).except(Class<?>... types): replaced by ScanOption.except(Class<?>... type).
  • forPackage(...).except(Predicate<Class<?>>... exclusionPredicate): replaced by ScanOption.except(Predicate<Class<?>> exclusionPredicate).

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - "* 0-3 * * *" (UTC).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.07%. Comparing base (94c27f6) to head (877b6a0).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main     #119   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     84.07%   84.07%           
  Complexity      467      467           
=========================================
  Files            30       30           
  Lines          1206     1206           
  Branches        267      267           
=========================================
  Hits           1014     1014           
  Misses          170      170           
  Partials         22       22           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@renovate renovate bot merged commit d270593 into main Feb 7, 2025
2 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/equalsverifier branch February 7, 2025 02:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant