You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Judging by what's inside the current .travis.yml here, and the missing engines in the package.json, I suspect that the lts upgrade policy is the right fit (it adds new versions as soon as they are released, never removes LTS versions, removes non-LTS versions when they reach EOL).
Is that OK?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have no objections. I'd also be open to moving from Travis over to GitHub Actions like we have done for several other repositories in the nodejs org.
dominykas
added a commit
to dominykas/core-validate-commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 22, 2020
tl;dr: I'd like to open a PR to replace the
node_js
section in the.travis.yml
with an imported https://github.com/nodejs/ci-config-travis/blob/master/lts/gte-8.ymlBackground: Package Maintenance WG has built a repository of shared Travis CI imports. The imports will be automatically updated as new Node.js versions get released.
Judging by what's inside the current
.travis.yml
here, and the missingengines
in thepackage.json
, I suspect that thelts
upgrade policy is the right fit (it adds new versions as soon as they are released, never removes LTS versions, removes non-LTS versions when they reach EOL).Is that OK?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: