Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency lxml to v5.3.1 #1482

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 13, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
lxml (source, changelog) 5.2.2 -> 5.3.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

lxml/lxml (lxml)

v5.3.1

Compare Source

==================

Bugs fixed

  • GH#440: Some tests were adapted for libxml2 2.14.0.
    Patch by Nick Wellnhofer.

  • LP#2097175: DTD(external_id="…") erroneously required a byte string as ID value.

  • GH#450: iterparse() internally triggered the `DeprecationWarning`` added in lxml 5.3.0 when parsing HTML.

Other changes

  • GH#442: Binary wheels for macOS no longer use the linker flag -flat_namespace.

v5.3.0

Compare Source

==================

Features added

  • GH#421: Nested CDATA sections are no longer rejected but split on output
    to represent ]]> correctly.
    Patch by Gertjan Klein.

Bugs fixed

  • LP#2060160: Attribute values serialised differently in xmlfile.element() and xmlfile.write().

  • LP#2058177: The ISO-Schematron implementation could fail on unknown prefixes.
    Patch by David Lakin.

Other changes

  • LP#2067707: The strip_cdata option in HTMLParser() turned out to be useless and is now deprecated.

  • Binary wheels use the library versions libxml2 2.12.9 and libxslt 1.1.42.

  • Windows binary wheels use the library versions libxml2 2.11.8 and libxslt 1.1.39.

  • Built with Cython 3.0.11.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Sep 13, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lxml-5.x-lockfile branch 13 times, most recently from 73884be to 71d22b3 Compare September 21, 2024 04:48
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lxml-5.x-lockfile branch 16 times, most recently from 3b06cef to 1fa69ff Compare September 25, 2024 22:54
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lxml-5.x-lockfile branch 9 times, most recently from 9f00e17 to 84773b0 Compare February 10, 2025 06:05
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency lxml to v5.3.0 fix(deps): update dependency lxml to v5.3.1 Feb 10, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lxml-5.x-lockfile branch 10 times, most recently from 02994e5 to 1293599 Compare February 17, 2025 05:24
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lxml-5.x-lockfile branch 5 times, most recently from 43bad39 to b25994a Compare February 22, 2025 05:17
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency lxml to v5.3.1 Update dependency lxml to v5.3.1 Feb 23, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lxml-5.x-lockfile branch 2 times, most recently from c27dbc4 to 16b5248 Compare February 24, 2025 05:21
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lxml-5.x-lockfile branch from 16b5248 to 7e65b81 Compare February 25, 2025 05:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants