Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[docs][data grid] Copyedit the Row Grouping doc #16217

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mapache-salvaje
Copy link
Contributor

Part of the ongoing auditing/editing project.

@mapache-salvaje mapache-salvaje added docs Improvements or additions to the documentation component: data grid This is the name of the generic UI component, not the React module! feature: Row grouping Related to the data grid Row grouping feature enhancement This is not a bug, nor a new feature labels Jan 16, 2025
@mui-bot
Copy link

mui-bot commented Jan 16, 2025


{{"demo": "RowGroupingBasicExample.js", "bg": "inline", "defaultCodeOpen": false}}

:::info
If you are looking for row grouping on the server-side, see [server-side row grouping](/x/react-data-grid/server-side-data/row-grouping/).
This document covers client-side implementation.
For row grouping on the server side, see [server-side row grouping](/x/react-data-grid/server-side-data/row-grouping/).
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This Vale warning is incorrect 😭 I'll open a separate PR to address it

Screenshot 2025-02-28 at 9 57 48 AM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component: data grid This is the name of the generic UI component, not the React module! docs Improvements or additions to the documentation enhancement This is not a bug, nor a new feature feature: Row grouping Related to the data grid Row grouping feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants