You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Proposed change: We should run the same release bundle workflow for PR and release. The only difference is that during release, at the end of the workflow, we upload the artifacts.
Motivation: Having different workflows is harder to maintain and more error prone. I'm not aware of any reason why we should keep them different.
We should also consider restructuring the workflow into separate jobs. One to build the bundle, one that download and test the bundle and a third to publish.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have two different ways today of building release bundles, one in
`kani.yml` and another one in `release.yml`, and only the `kani.yml`
actually run tests. This is error prone, since the release workflow only
runs during a release without validation tests, and the build can
diverge from what's being tested in CI.
Instead, we will always run the same workflow, except for the steps that
create the release.
Resolves#2703
Co-authored-by: Zyad Hassan <88045115+zhassan-aws@users.noreply.github.com>
Proposed change: We should run the same release bundle workflow for PR and release. The only difference is that during release, at the end of the workflow, we upload the artifacts.
Motivation: Having different workflows is harder to maintain and more error prone. I'm not aware of any reason why we should keep them different.
We should also consider restructuring the workflow into separate jobs. One to build the bundle, one that download and test the bundle and a third to publish.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: