ISO: Differences in structure of iso-rice-en and iso-rice-zh

[Intelligent2013]

There are differences between xml and doc for ISO rice.

1. In iso-rice-zh.xml there isn't section/preface/introduction, looks like it moved into sections/clause (first clause), i.e. second clause in iso-rice-zh.xml is first clause (Scope) in iso-rice-en.xml.

2. If compare docs iso-rice-en.doc and iso-rice-zh.doc :

• in iso-rice-zh.doc section 'Normative references' (7 elements) moved at the end of document as Bibliography (7 elements)
• in iso-rice-zh.doc there isn't last Bibliography section which contains 16 elements (in iso-rice-en.doc).
  But xml there are such data.

3. In iso-rice-en.xml the section 'Terms and definitions' placed in terms/term tag, but iso-rice-zh.xml this section placed in clause/clause tag.
   These texts 'paddy', 'husked rice', 'milled rice' display in Contents table (see image), because they are in clause/clause (we show 1st and 2nd level titles from clauses).

[ronaldtse]

1. In the TOC, individual terms should not be TOC entries.

2. The difference in Normative References and Bibliography are probably errors. Tracking in ISO Rice Chinese marked up differently from English in XML metanorma-iso#299 .

[Intelligent2013]

1. In the TOC, individual terms should not be TOC entries.

I display 1st and 2nd levels of clauses (for example, 4 and 4.1, 4.2) in TOC.
In https://metanorma.github.io/mn-samples-iso/documents/iso-rice-zh.xml, individuals terms placed in clause(s):

In https://metanorma.github.io/mn-samples-iso/documents/iso-rice-en.xml, individuals terms places in term(s), so it's correct:

[ronaldtse]

@Intelligent2013 thank you for the explanation. I can confirm that the XML generated is incorrect. This will be resolved in metanorma/metanorma-iso#299 .

[opoudjis]

@Intelligent2013 I've fixed these.

Yes I know it's taken a month. I have a large backlog...