ISO Rice Chinese marked up differently from English in XML

[ronaldtse]

The ISO Rice document is provided in https://github.com/metanorma/mn-samples-iso . Apparently, the DOC output differs as raised in metanorma/mn-native-pdf#31 .

Issue content quoted below:

There are differences between xml and doc for ISO rice.

1. In iso-rice-zh.xml there isn't section/preface/introduction, looks like it moved into sections/clause (first clause), i.e. second clause in iso-rice-zh.xml is first clause (Scope) in iso-rice-en.xml.
2. If compare docs iso-rice-en.doc and iso-rice-zh.doc :

• in iso-rice-zh.doc section 'Normative references' (7 elements) moved at the end of document as Bibliography (7 elements)
• in iso-rice-zh.doc there isn't last Bibliography section which contains 16 elements (in iso-rice-en.doc).
  But xml there are such data.

3. In iso-rice-en.xml the section 'Terms and definitions' placed in terms/term tag, but iso-rice-zh.xml this section placed in clause/clause tag.
   These texts 'paddy', 'husked rice', 'milled rice' display in Contents table (see image), because they are in clause/clause (we show 1st and 2nd level titles from clauses).

[ronaldtse]

The Chinese XML T&D section is marked up incorrectly, see metanorma/mn-native-pdf#31 (comment) .

[opoudjis]

I actually stumbled across some of these errors the other day, and fixed a couple already.

[opoudjis]

The issue is that the parser only recognises titles as distinct structural elements in English. If the title is in a different language, you need to use the heading attribute to indicate what kind of title it is.

[opoudjis]

... In fact yes, I did already fix them.