Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial check: all tables/figures/equations/annexes need to be referenced at least once #1211

Closed
ronaldtse opened this issue Sep 8, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

From @stuartgalt

ISO style checks should make sure that all tables, figures, equations are referenced somewhere in the document.

@ronaldtse

This is an ISO DIR or House Style requirement. All these items and the Annexes need to be referenced at least once.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🆕 New in Metanorma Sep 8, 2024
@ronaldtse ronaldtse moved this from 🆕 New to 🌋 Urgent in Metanorma Sep 8, 2024
@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor

opoudjis commented Sep 8, 2024

That is not how I read the ISO House Style at all, but I will implement this: all numbered tables, figures, formulae, annexes (top level: Annex A). Presumably not examples, notes, admonitions, lists.

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor Author

ronaldtse commented Sep 8, 2024

Providing references as requested by @opoudjis :

https://www.iso.org/sites/directives/current/part2/index.xhtml#_idTextAnchor432

ISO DIR 2:

Annexes

Screenshot 2024-09-08 at 4 29 22 PM

Formulas

Screenshot 2024-09-08 at 4 34 19 PM

Figures

Screenshot 2024-09-08 at 4 00 13 PM

Tables

Screenshot 2024-09-08 at 3 59 58 PM

I am seeking clarification from ISO on whether:

  • subfigures need references
  • unnumbered formulas need references

@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor

opoudjis commented Sep 8, 2024

I continue not to interpret ISO/IEC DIR 2 that way (the examples are more about making sure the examples are not implicitly referenced, e.g. as "see the following example") In any case, done.

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor Author

We received the following clarification from ISO:

  1. the current wording that says “xxx shall be explicitly referred to within the text” means “xxx must be referred within the text at least once” (this is my understanding).

=> Yes. “shall” expresses a requirement.

  1. a formula can unnumbered, and in this case it does not need to be referenced inside the text? According to Directives, Part 2, 27.4, a formula should be referenced if it is numbered.

=> “Should” expresses a recommendation, so it’s not required to reference a formula, but it’s good practice to do so.

  1. a subfigure must have an internal reference from the text? The requirement to reference figures only applies to top-level figures.

=> Subfigures can be referenced in the text but this is not obligatory.

@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor

2 would mean that the warning about formulas not being referenced is downgraded, from 1 to 2.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 👀 In review to ✅ Done in Metanorma Sep 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants