Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 11, 2024. It is now read-only.

Add activity toggle for TAC #12413

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Apr 12, 2024
Merged

Add activity toggle for TAC #12413

merged 9 commits into from
Apr 12, 2024

Conversation

dbkr
Copy link
Member

@dbkr dbkr commented Apr 11, 2024

Takes the general activity/bold toggle out of labs and adds a setting to display activity in the TAC, as we did previously.

Screenshot 2024-04-11 at 16 42 38

Checklist

  • Tests written for new code (and old code if feasible).
  • New or updated public/exported symbols have accurate TSDoc documentation.
  • Linter and other CI checks pass.
  • Sign-off given on the changes (see CONTRIBUTING.md).

@dbkr dbkr added the T-Enhancement New features, changes in functionality, performance boosts, user-facing improvements label Apr 11, 2024
default: false,
invertedSettingName: "feature_hidebold",
},
"Notifications.hidebold_tac": {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The name hidebold_tac is hard to understand. What bold means in TAC? Bold is the visual representation of a thread state. In our case we want to show only notifications and highlights if this settings is at true

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I was going for consistency with the other setting, but maybe it's better to just be clear. Renamed.

@dbkr dbkr added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 12, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 14cc44e Apr 12, 2024
22 checks passed
@dbkr dbkr deleted the dbkr/tac_activity_toggle branch April 12, 2024 13:40
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
T-Enhancement New features, changes in functionality, performance boosts, user-facing improvements
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants