You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, if a face is marked as Unknown (using the I don't know option) it is being asked about every time.
This could be fine if there are two faces like that. Nevertheless, In my collection, there are some 30 people do not really know / care to have groupped. Yet every time I want to add a new person I do care about , I have to go through all those.
If a possibility to hide a person was added, all those could be added as a I don;t care person, and subsequently hidden from the view.
As I understand, this feature is to IGNORE a group of RECOGNIZED faces which are unknown or by other reasons to be not named. This (possible more) groups of unnamed faces should not be presented in the list groups to be named (new persons).
Agreed, currently so I don’t have to cycle through those faces everytime I created a person named “unknown” and set them all to that, but I have no way of hiding these tags in my images.
…486#405
For now it simply marks it as invisible and does not suggest it again, to name
them.
Also add an is_groupable column fo faces table to implement "This is not this
person" feature... Issue #506#158
Currently, if a face is marked as Unknown (using the I don't know option) it is being asked about every time.
This could be fine if there are two faces like that. Nevertheless, In my collection, there are some 30 people do not really know / care to have groupped. Yet every time I want to add a new person I do care about , I have to go through all those.
If a possibility to hide a person was added, all those could be added as a I don;t care person, and subsequently hidden from the view.
I believe this is somewhat related to #404
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: