[mlir] introduce transform.loop.forall_to_for #65474
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
matthias-springer
approved these changes
Sep 6, 2023
Add a straightforward sequentialization transform from `scf.forall` to a nest of `scf.for` in absence of results and expose it as a transform op. This is helpful in combination with other transform ops, particularly fusion, that work best on parallel-by-construction `scf.forall` but later need to target sequential `for` loops.
ftynse
force-pushed
the
td-halide-ready-4
branch
from
f450b35 to
970d81c
Compare
This was referenced Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a straightforward sequentialization transform from
scf.forallto a nest ofscf.forin absence of results and expose it as a transform op. This is helpful in combination with other transform ops, particularly fusion, that work best on parallel-by-constructionscf.forallbut later need to target sequentialforloops.