Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Freethreading - module markers + CI #275
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Freethreading - module markers + CI #275
Changes from 5 commits
8e030ba
13f5bc2
3e4d851
9f7ef44
fd1726b
a1a904d
e4a6f49
0c01ce7
728a8d2
37b9f69
e78f219
12abd0f
bd0fe7a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure this will always be true for the IO module. E.g. I might want to allow a Python HTTP library like aiohttp to be used for making the
parquet
file readsThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
True, if unmodified (as in, rust locking structures cfg-gated on
Py_GIL_DISABLED
) - there isn't code that allows that quite yet, right?I should definitely take a crack at pytest-freethread in general before this is merged (at the very least CI for a single test in pyo3-arrow or core).
Thinking about it, pretty much all users of the freethreading build at the moment are other library maintainers porting their package to freethreading - this is probably a rare instance (especially given the main dependant is geoarrow.rust.io) where hard concurrency errors are preferred over
RuntimeWarning
.